Thor vs Thanos

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You are truly slow and a idiot. So, your comparing blowing somebody out and giving them a courtesy good game comment as to someone saying it's been eons since I've fought a foe like you. When you blow somebody out you don't say it's been years since I played a foe like yourself haha. Let's break it down for you since clearly you have a tough time understanding the English language. Odin has fought many people correct? You do know what eons means right or do you need to look it up. SO, we know Odin has fought many people, we know eons is a good amount of time.. Thus him saying he hasn't fought a foe equal to thanos very clearly is saying he was a good adversary and better then anyone he's fought in Eons. Seriously, you look horrible trying to pass off your good game comment to what odin said to Thanos.

Again, he never said that he hasn't fought a foe "equal" to Thanos. the fact that you have to keep changing his comment is rather telling.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He lost the match; however he didn't lose the fight seeing as he was able to get back up, just like Thanos.

Again, was his character a peer of Undertaker's?

They aren't the same. Hardy is a peer of the taker's in that matchup though imo.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos didn't lose though.

They aren't the same. Hardy is a peer of the taker's in that matchup though imo.

The fight part is mostly the same, with the only difference being that Jeff managed to hurt Taker a few times, so in that sense he actually did better than Thanos did vs Odin.

So you're saying that Jeff was only a peer for that match, does that mean you think he is normally below Taker?

Originally posted by Silent Master
The fight part is mostly the same, with the only difference being that Jeff managed to hurt Taker a few times, so in that sense he actually did better than Thanos did vs Odin.

So you're saying that Jeff was only a peer for that match, does that mean you think he is normally below Taker?

The difference is Hardy lost while Thanos did not.

Winning the match didn't require him to beat Jeff, it just required him to reach the belt first.

I'm talking about the actual fight, and that ended just like Odin vs Thanos.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Winning the match didn't require him to beat Jeff, it just required him to reach the belt first.

I'm talking about the actual fight, and that ended just like Odin vs Thanos.

The fight ended with no winner while the Hardy match ended with him losing. 🙄

So you're basically saying that Jeff was only a peer for that one match, does that mean you think he is normally below Taker?

Silent... your stupidity knows no bounds.... So, your saying Odin was simply saying he hasn't fought a foe like Thanos (big purple titan dude) in Eons and that is what the writers intentions were? You know damn well the writer in using that sentence was saying Thanos was the strongest foe he's fought in Eons. The more you try and say that isn't what the quote means the more you look like a tool.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Silent... your stupidity knows no bounds.... So, your saying Odin was simply saying he hasn't fought a foe like Thanos (big purple titan dude) in Eons and that is what the writers intentions were? You know damn well the writer in using that sentence was saying Thanos was the strongest foe he's fought in Eons. The more you try and say that isn't what the quote means the more you look like a tool.

All I have to do is look at Odin's other fights to know that the writers intent wasn't that Thanos was the strongest, most powerful or toughest opponent Odin has fought in eons.

I believe he was referring to Thanos' determination, or something else along those lines.

Originally posted by Silent Master
All I have to do is look at Odin's other fights to know that the writers intent wasn't that Thanos was the strongest, most powerful or toughest opponent Odin has fought in eons.

I believe he was referring to Thanos' determination, or something else along those lines.

Odin's never fougth someone who was that horribly outmatched and outgunned.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Silent... your stupidity knows no bounds.... So, your saying Odin was simply saying he hasn't fought a foe like Thanos (big purple titan dude) in Eons and that is what the writers intentions were? You know damn well the writer in using that sentence was saying Thanos was the strongest foe he's fought in Eons. The more you try and say that isn't what the quote means the more you look like a tool.

Odin's salutation is almost directly analogous to when Namor salutes Daredevil after their first fight in Dardevil #7, where he states that he holds DD in higher regard then the Fantastic Four or Avengers because he wouldn't give up despite being outclassed. Thanos and DD both got romped by opponents who held back their full might. Both were worthy of salutation. But both were nowhere near the peers of their opponents. It's as plain as day. Nuff said.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
You're stretching the limits of sensibility by taking the absolute extreme interpretation of his statement which is a salutation of his worthy tenacity, not an acknowledgement of his power. Thanos didn't even prove his power in his fight against Odin because Odin was holding back. How could Thanos possibly be the strongest foe Odin's fought when the Celestials, Seth, the Enchanters, Surtur, Infinity and others outclass Thanos by miles? Oh, now I remember. Because both you and quanchi112 value the plain presentation of the facts and circumstances of the comics far less than any pointless opportunity, no matter how outlandish, to highball Thanos.

Odin's salutation is almost directly analogous to when Namor salutes Daredevil after their first fight in Dardevil #7, where he states that he holds DD in higher regard then the Fantastic Four or Avengers because he wouldn't give up despite being outclassed. Thanos and DD both got romped by opponents who held back their full might. Both were worthy of salutation. But both were nowhere near the peers of their opponents. It's as plain as day. Nuff said.

Which is the point I was making with the Undertaker vs Jeff example, Quan however keeps purposely missing my point.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Which is the point I was making with the Undertaker vs Jeff example, Quan however keeps purposely missing my point.

Originally posted by iceman24567
It's what he does. How can Thanos beat Destroyer Armor Thor?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So you're basically saying that Jeff was only a peer for that one match, does that mean you think he is normally below Taker?

Originally posted by Silent Master
All I have to do is look at Odin's other fights to know that the writers intent wasn't that Thanos was the strongest, most powerful or toughest opponent Odin has fought in eons.

I believe he was referring to Thanos' determination, or something else along those lines.

Originally posted by iceman24567
It's what he does. How can Thanos beat Destroyer Armor Thor?

Originally posted by quanchi112
He is powerful enough to defeat the destroyer.

Originally posted by iceman24567
Nope

Thanos in the first scenario and Thor in the second

Originally posted by quanchi112
I guess we disagree. I know you aren't going to prove it though.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You only asked me about that match. I am only giving my opinion about that matchup because I have never seen them fight otherwise and am going on what you told me.

Just like you have only ever seen Odin and Thanos fight once, so if one fight is enough to say that Thanos is Odin's peer, the same should hold true for Jeff.

Originally posted by quanchi112
What don't you get? What does Odin's other fights have to do with this one?

Considering the nature of his comment, everything.