USA vs Roman Empire IN A WAR

Started by Hewhoknowsall19 pages
Originally posted by inimalist
lol

'tis true.

And oh yeah, how to flaming arrows take out tanks?

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall

And oh yeah, how to flaming arrows take out tanks?

maybe someone left the gas cap on the tank open.

The Romans wouldn't even win against the famously incompetent modern Italian military.

Well this is assuming that the Roman's do not piss their tunics when they see a tank rolling up on them or a gun ship laying waste to an entire platoon of men in a matter of seconds or when their leaders head suddenly explodes from a snipers bullet.

Originally posted by The Scribe
That's how they fought.

Watch the video and tell me how many flaming arrows you see.
😉

No, that is an honorable fight.

Fighting on a battlefield instead of occupying land like they are doing in Iraq.
That is not a war.

If there was no guerrilla warfare you wouldn't be able to put United States under you avy. 😉

Originally posted by Dr Will Hatch
The Romans wouldn't even win against the famously incompetent modern Italian military.

What about the French? (no offense meant)

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
What about the French? (no offense meant)
I'm not sure, but I think in close combat range the mere act of Savate might scare them shitless. 😛

Seriously, any generals who are probably educated in tactics going all the way back to the Roman Republic should be able to handle anything the (Time traveling?) Romans have to offer.

It's funny how the greatest Empire (or one of the greatest) ever can be beaten by modern day Iceland...

It WAS the greatest Empire.

Give us Star Wars technology, let us decline, then advance us to immortal gods, and we'd say something similar along those lines.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
It's funny how the greatest Empire (or one of the greatest) ever can be beaten by modern day Iceland...

Rome was by no means the greatest empire. I'd give that one to Britain.

It was greatest in terms of populations and land coverage (Mongols can f*ck off). But the Romans were just awesome.

Yeah, Rome lasted much longer and contributed much more to humanity, although Britain DID end up creating most of the countries in North/South America, as well as spreading the English language.

The possibility of the US fighting Rome will never happen, it would be far more plausible for the European Union to march on Iran (and win) led by Germany.

Rome alone? pfft.

Originally posted by Stoic
The possibility of the US fighting Rome will never happen, it would be far more plausible for the European Union to march on Iran (and win) led by Germany.

Rome alone? pfft.

😆

Come on: there has to be a reason why 15 people voted for Rome!

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Come on: there has to be a reason why 15 people voted for Rome!

It's because they don't know what they are talking about.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Come on: there has to be a reason why 15 people voted for Rome!

Because they hate you.

Because their Roman? 😖

Originally posted by Da Pittman
Because their Roman? 😖

That's not an advantage at all.

The only possible way to win, for the romans, is if the americans are equipped like the romans.

Other than that, it would suck to be a roman. ONE MAN from today, with a chain gun, would mope the floor with an entire roman unity. He wold cut them in half, and finish them with a M-16.

Now, that's without compting on the evolvment of one of this bad boys:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercarrier