Sun dipped Superman vs Rune King Thor

It's ABSOLUTELY hyperbole, i don't need to dispute it, the comic does it for me already. it was a throwaway act in a book with only one unifying concept: space randomness and overcoming obstacles. The robots may or may not have been made of the metal. And the metal may or may not have been unbreakable. Shit could easily be stupid hyperbole. I mean, he broke it. Fairly easy too. And we see that metal nowhere else.

Any comparative examples? Nope. Any other appearances? Nope. Has anyone faced with a hero ever made a hyperbolic, idiotic, statement that was patently wrong? ALL THE TIME! Y'all are all geeked over how undefeatable some robots are when a page earlier heros clearly state they've been defeating them but it's getting harder. 😂

He said " the robots are stronger" knowing he just saw superman break those chains. Which either
A. Devalues how strong those chains are
Or
B. Devalues again the words and credibility of the villain.

If he says those robots are faster and stronger than him, then that would mean any JL member that takes the robot down would be stronger than superman. And we all know that's not true
In conclusion this guy is OBVIOUSLY using hyperbolic statements to discourage. Not that the things he is saying is actually true. You can deny it or and try to wave it off but given what we seen, there is mountain of evidence youd have to ignore to try and keep the feat. Period

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
the claim of the chains being unbreakable was an unreliable one made by a character prone to hyperbolic statements.

This whole feat is invalidated by a string of logical inconsistencies, bUt hE sAiD uNbReAkBlE. In every issue of this book, from the boxing match (you can't win) to the duality where Clark is stranded on a planet talking to Superman (you can't save her) hyperbolic statements were made with the intent of trying to get Clark to give up. The statement about the chains and robots were the same. literally the theme of the entire series

He also spreads his buttcheeks twice a week for the likes of Grundy and Mongul.

As nobody else could physically take their cocks, it's a job for Superman.

superman can take all cummers, if you know what i mean.

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman's best strength feat is breaking those chains.

Great striking force requires high speed of the limb and strength behind the the push of the limb. Both together determine striking force.

Superman has superspeed and superstrength. Superman can punch at insane speeds while having planetary push forces behind them.

Now, what's RKT's best durability feat against physical strikes?

Clown post. Prove the same things that you've asked me to prove. We can both play the invalidation game. Thing is, you're attempting to perform mental gymnastics, but you keep falling on your head. Read the book and stop wasting time.

Diesldude cannot possibly be still running his mouth. Lol. Everytime someone bust a myth about Superman, he comes lying. No credibility whatsoever.

Originally posted by JBL
Diesldude cannot possibly be still running his mouth. Lol. Everytime someone bust a myth about Superman, he comes lying. No credibility whatsoever.

Originally posted by Diesldude
. You got your ass whupped in front of your kid. Lol glowing white, Go talk about rainbows with him.

Originally posted by JBL
You are the idiot who thought that something burning red is hotter than white-hot. That's why your Superman lover friends refuse to come to your rescue idiot.

Originally posted by Stoic
Clown post. Prove the same things that you've asked me to prove. We can both play the invalidation game. Thing is, you're attempting to perform mental gymnastics, but you keep falling on your head. Read the book and stop wasting time.

I already proven Superman's striking ability. He can move his hand at insane speeds and also be pushing with planetary power.

Now you must prove that RKT can tank that without damage.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
It's ABSOLUTELY hyperbole, i don't need to dispute it, the comic does it for me already. it was a throwaway act in a book with only one unifying concept: space randomness and overcoming obstacles. The robots may or may not have been made of the metal. And the metal may or may not have been unbreakable. Shit could easily be stupid hyperbole. I mean, he broke it. Fairly easy too. And we see that metal nowhere else.

Any comparative examples? Nope. Any other appearances? Nope. Has anyone faced with a hero ever made a hyperbolic, idiotic, statement that was patently wrong? ALL THE TIME! Y'all are all geeked over how undefeatable some robots are when a page earlier heros clearly state they've been defeating them but it's getting harder. 😂

He said " the robots are stronger" knowing he just saw superman break those chains. Which either
A. Devalues how strong those chains are
Or
B. Devalues again the words and credibility of the villain.

If he says those robots are faster and stronger than him, then that would mean any JL member that takes the robot down would be stronger than superman. And we all know that's not true
In conclusion this guy is OBVIOUSLY using hyperbolic statements to discourage. Not that the things he is saying is actually true. You can deny it or and try to wave it off but given what we seen, there is mountain of evidence youd have to ignore to try and keep the feat. Period

Can certain people read?? It was stated that Superman was white-hot. Even the dumbest Superman fan can read that. Oops , no he can't.

Originally posted by h1a8
I already proven Superman's striking ability. He can move his hand at insane speeds and also be pushing with planetary power.

Now you must prove that RKT can tank that without damage.

We go by the writer's intent and what he is story telling to the audience.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
It's ABSOLUTELY hyperbole, i don't need to dispute it, the comic does it for me already. it was a throwaway act in a book with only one unifying concept: space randomness and overcoming obstacles. The robots may or may not have been made of the metal. And the metal may or may not have been unbreakable. Shit could easily be stupid hyperbole. I mean, he broke it. Fairly easy too. And we see that metal nowhere else.

Any comparative examples? Nope. Any other appearances? Nope. Has anyone faced with a hero ever made a hyperbolic, idiotic, statement that was patently wrong? ALL THE TIME! Y'all are all geeked over how undefeatable some robots are when a page earlier heros clearly state they've been defeating them but it's getting harder. 😂

He said " the robots are stronger" knowing he just saw superman break those chains. Which either
A. Devalues how strong those chains are
Or
B. Devalues again the words and credibility of the villain.

If he says those robots are faster and stronger than him, then that would mean any JL member that takes the robot down would be stronger than superman. And we all know that's not true
In conclusion this guy is OBVIOUSLY using hyperbolic statements to discourage. Not that the things he is saying is actually true. You can deny it or and try to wave it off but given what we seen, there is mountain of evidence youd have to ignore to try and keep the feat. Period

You strength of chains is quantifiable and he stated what they are used for. So no exaggeration there.

He didn’t know anyone could break the chains, but Superman proved him wrong. He has robots that were supposedly stronger than Superman but he didn’t know Superman has dynamic strength. Those robots beat up everyone on earth. Superman took on a greater number by himself.

Dynamic strength? I guess Zod, WW and her mother has super dynamic strength then.

Originally posted by -Pr-
When DC says they're wrong, then yes, they are.

DC, for better or worse, decides what Superman is and isn't. Not me (unfortunately), and not you (thank ****ing god). I would love to be able to go against them on a whole number of issues (both Superman-related and otherwise), but I can't. Because then we wouldn't be talking about Superman anymore. It would be My version of Superman, not DC's.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85

Ok.

Writer interviews are inadmissible however

But H12 inteeyare is huh? OK👍

Originally posted by JBL
Good thing I know 4 writers from DC comics. This dynamic strength crap came from h12.

Writers don't matter. What's on the printed page matters. And on the printed page, DC has shown multiple examples of Superman using dynamic strength.

What's a h12?

Originally posted by JBL
But H12 inteeyare is huh? OK👍

?

But yeah. Writer interviews alas are inadmissible.

Don't like it? Not really our problem, despite how much you may dislike it.