Black Adam vs Gladiator

Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
Well, this is f*cking retarded logic, since Gladiator flew that fast with a boost from the f*cking sun blowing up behind him, and he did it in space.
I want to see some scans of Gladiator flying this fast on Earth then. He needed the Uni-Power to fly fast enough to save people from a tidal wave on Earth, but you wouldn't know that, would you?

Also, I have never saw Black Adam even attempt to destroy a planet, or anything, besides a person (also noted, that Black Adam has actually a good winning record).

I have seen Gladiator fail to KO Hulk, I've seen him smashed... smashed by Masterson Thor, smashed by normal Thor, beaten like nothing by Black Bolt... twice. Why didn't he destroy Black Bolt in three punches?
One of his best feats are non-canon (that were brought up in this thread), in which case, he beat Ego, and managed to stalemate Surfer (all the while, had Surfer actually physically overpowering him).

Wow, no f*cking kidding! He wifted a big meteor?!?!? He destroyed a planet wit punches??!?!
Too bad this type of shit, has never been incorporated into one of his fights.

On the other hand, we have Black Adam ripping people in half, fighting teams of people who some of which, are way higher than Gladiator.
Having fights against Glad's clear superiour, in which he doesn't even exert himself.

I really hate it when people make it seem like losing to Hulk, Thor or BB is a low showing.

And then the never incorporating planetary damage into his fights argument is hella weak, since DC and Marvel both don't really do that.

Stormbreaker was a big deal, because of the planetary damage that racked up.

Nobody in DC or Marvel, really incorporate it into their fights.

Should i say BRB> The DC Top tier since he cratered a planet smashing Stardust into it, and then destroyed the rest with a psuedogodblast thingy?

Hell no.

I agree with your sentiments, but i don't think anyone would be blatantly wrong for going either way here.

Originally posted by UniOmni
I really hate it when people make it seem like losing to Hulk, Thor or BB is a low showing.

Originally posted by carver9
You do know that death stroke hit flash also. You do know that batman has also tagged the flash. Black adam is one of my favorite if not best comic character out and he has some amazing feats but I just dont think that he could take gladiator.

One thing that changes everything about this is that, everyone on the scans that you just showed aint even close to the battle process that gladiator has. The guy was trained to fight during birth. Everyone on that list also gets own on a regular basis. Despero, doomsday, metallo, black adam, superman, wonderwoman have also gave jla trouble, captain marvel, dr poloris, batman, I can keep going. Everybody has there day to shine. Show me the feats so I can vote for my favorite comic character. Please make me change my mind because the little things that you have shown me has not convince me yet.

The difference is, Black Adam didn't tag him, Black Adam faced him head on, and punched him out... all the while, while fighting people more powerful than Glads.

The funny thing is, Glads was owned by Hulk, so your first point goes down the shitbox.

Look again, read the comic... it was the JSA. Also, the funny thing is, all those people you just listed are also higher than Gladiator.
Save Polaris, and Batman.
Also, when did Batman do this?

Feats? Maybe if you got out of the Gladiator respect thread, and went into Black Adam's...
Go read it, because you obviously don't know that much about your "favorite character". 🙄

Originally posted by UniOmni
I really hate it when people make it seem like losing to Hulk, Thor or BB is a low showing.

And then the never incorporating planetary damage into his fights argument is hella weak, since DC and Marvel both don't really do that.

Stormbreaker was a big deal, because of the planetary damage that racked up.

Nobody in DC or Marvel, really incorporate it into their fights.

Should i say BRB> The DC Top tier since he cratered a planet smashing Stardust into it, and then destroyed the rest with a psuedogodblast thingy?

Hell no.

I agree with your sentiments, but i don't think anyone would be blatantly wrong for going either way here.

Other than that, it isn't really.

But, the difference is, that here, Gladiator is "going" to be able to break a planet apart in three punches, and yet, he has never duplicated the feat, in any of his fights, or even showed near the amount of strength.
But in this fight, he has the strength to, and all other showings are wrong, according to carver.

I don't care... do whatever you must.

Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
It is a low showing, when he's supposedly able to beat Black Adam.

Other than that, it isn't really.

But, the difference is, that here, Gladiator is "going" to be able to break a planet apart in three punches, and yet, he has never duplicated the feat, in any of his fights, or even showed near the amount of strength.
But in this fight, he has the strength to, and all other showings are wrong, according to carver.

I don't care... do whatever you must.

So because Thor lost a slugfest with the Hulk, means he can't stand against Teth in a slugfest?

Since when is losing against the most physically powerful top tier in a company a low showing, is all i wonder?

I knew Hulk was downgraded here, but damn.

Originally posted by UniOmni
So because Thor lost a slugfest with the Hulk, means he can't stand against Teth in a slugfest?

Originally posted by UniOmni
So because Thor lost a slugfest with the Hulk, means he can't stand against Teth in a slugfest?

Since when is losing against the most physically powerful top tier in a company a low showing, is all i wonder?

I knew Hulk was downgraded here, but damn.

Thor would get murdered in a slugfest with BA. Not only is Teth stronger than Hulk, he's also WAY faster.

Hulk is not a top tier. He's currently ranked low herald. And losing to him means you're not gonna beat BA in a fistfight.

Edit: Val beat me to it. 😛

Originally posted by Validus
Horrible example because you'd be a tard to think Thor beats Adam (or Hulk) without Mjolnir.

I don't think Thor can beat Teth in a slugfest without the hammer.

I do think he can acquit himself well, and not get murdered, as TP so wrongly put it.

And Teth isn't stronger than Hulk, since Hulks power level varies.

And lol at Hulk not being top tier.

He stalemates or beats top tiers, but isn't one himself?

GO AWAY!!

Originally posted by UniOmni
So because Thor lost a slugfest with the Hulk, means he can't stand against Teth in a slugfest?

Since when is losing against the most physically powerful top tier in a company a low showing, is all i wonder?

I knew Hulk was downgraded here, but damn.

The difference is, Gladiator used his HV, his speed, his punches, and still got punked.

If he used just h2h, then your example would actually be an example.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Thor would get murdered in a slugfest with BA. Not only is Teth stronger than Hulk, he's also WAY faster.

Hulk is not a top tier. He's currently ranked low herald. And losing to him means you're not gonna beat BA in a fistfight.

Edit: Val beat me to it. 😛

Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
I remember Thor almost putting Hulk down in one of the fights, but that is neither here, nor there.

The difference is, Gladiator used his HV, his speed, his punches, and still got punked.

If he used just h2h, then your example would actually be an example.

IIRC, his HV actually melted Hulks chest, but Hulks hf was really working that time.
So much so that his hand was healed into his chest when he held it over the wound.

Score one for hv.

And he grabbed Hulk and brought him into the atmosphere, to toss him, but got clapped for his efforts.

Score two for speed.

How is that different than Superman trying to do the same to DD, but getting elbow shanked for his troubles?

He lost to Professor Hulk iirc, who had an extremely high strength level.

No shame in that.

Doomsday has super speed. 313smart

Wasn't shown in that arc.

Originally posted by UniOmni
IIRC, his HV actually melted Hulks chest, but Hulks hf was really working that time.
So much so that his hand was healed into his chest when he held it over the wound.

Score one for hv.

And he grabbed Hulk and brought him into the atmosphere, to toss him, but got clapped for his efforts.

Score two for speed.

How is that different than Superman trying to do the same to DD, but getting elbow shanked for his troubles?

He lost to Professor Hulk iirc, who had an extremely high strength level.

No shame in that.

Originally posted by UniOmni
Wasn't shown in that arc.

Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
And, this had to do with Thor slugfesting Adam... why?

The only reason why i addressed you, is because i felt that you were implying that losing to Hulk is a low showing.

Agree to disagree.

Originally posted by Validus
Thor doesn't show his Godblast in every arc either. w00tduster

Not the same.

I merely asked how Superman getting elbow shanked is any different than Gladiator getting thunderclapped to the head.

You said DD has superspeed, and i merely returned that it wasn't shown in that arc.

You implied that DD shanked Superman using his superspeed, and i merely said that he hadn't used superspeed at all in that arc, so it wasn't superspeed shanking.

Originally posted by UniOmni
Not the same.

I merely asked how Superman getting elbow shanked is any different than Gladiator getting thunderclapped to the head.

You said DD has superspeed, and i merely returned that it wasn't shown in that arc.

You implied that DD shanked Superman using his superspeed, and i merely said that he hadn't used superspeed at all in that arc, so it wasn't superspeed shanking.

How do i know it wasn't?

Can you prove it was a superspeed shanking?

burden of proof and all that?

I don't remember seeing anything that goes along with conventional superspeed moves, ie zig zaggy blurring, or after images.

Did you?

Originally posted by UniOmni
How do i know it wasn't?

Can you prove it was a superspeed shanking?

burden of proof and all that?

I don't remember seeing anything that goes along with conventional superspeed moves, ie zig zaggy blurring, or after images.

Did you?

Would you say that a blitzing Flash getting tagged by Superman isn't evidence of Superman's speed? We know DD has speed ( 313 ). We know Hulk doesn't. Sucks to be Gladiator.