Black Adam vs Gladiator

Originally posted by Jebus reborn
Difference:

Gladiator was willing... Black Adam [b]will kill anyone who gets in his way. [/B]

If Lilandra of the Shiar would not have called off the bomb, Gladiator would kill each and every person on earth. Lilandra stopped him not him.

P.S. I think Vegeta from DBZ is based on Black Adams Personallity

Yeah, but would Gladiator ENJOY killing? ❌ BA would.

And yeah, he does seem like Vegeta, doesn't he? 😛 But I'm not sure who came first.

Originally posted by Hyperion Prime
If Lilandra of the Shiar would not have called off the bomb, Gladiator would kill each and every person on earth. Lilandra stopped him not him.

P.S. I think Vegeta from DBZ is based on Black Adams Personallity

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Yeah, but would Gladiator ENJOY killing? ❌ BA would.

And yeah, he does seem like Vegeta, doesn't he? 😛 But I'm not sure who came first.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Yeah, but would Gladiator ENJOY killing? ❌ BA would.

And yeah, he does seem like Vegeta, doesn't he? 😛 But I'm not sure who came first.

Now that I think of it Goku is not based entirely on Superman either. His origin is, but the Character's actions are based on Captain Marvel/Shazam and Vegeta is Black Adam.

Originally posted by Jebus reborn
And, how many people exactly has Gladiator brutally murdered?
Black Adam was going to try and rip off both Hal, and John's hands, so they wouldn't use their power rings.

Obviously Black Adam came many years before him.

Well if thats the case any sadisctic murderer in any comic should come out on top. Hell that means Classic Juggernaut should be able to beat Galactus. He didn't care about any human life man woman or child.

Gladiator doesn't have any scruples when it comes to killing I believe, except when you're speaking about Genocide. Because he did say something like "may the heavens forgive me" before ordering the Superguardians to kill all mutants.

Originally posted by Hyperion Prime
Well if thats the case any sadisctic murderer in any comic should come out on top. Hell that means Classic Juggernaut should be able to beat Galactus. He didn't care about any human life man woman or child.

Also, Classic Juggernaut cares about Black Tom, and others, and Galactus destroys planets without a care... your logic doesn't exactly work.

Originally posted by Jebus reborn
So, basically, you can't even remember what you were trying to say?
You were trying to make him out to be more ruthless than Adam. Or even ruthless in comparison.
I never said brutal equals a fight.

Also, Classic Juggernaut cares about Black Tom, and others, and Galactus destroys planets without a care... your logic doesn't exactly work.

Galadiator can be just as ruthless. But let's say he isn't. How does that automatically give Adam the win. If ruthlessnes is king then why doesn't the Joker rule the multiverse?

Black Adam cares about things also

Galactus destroys planets to survive like humans destroy heards of Buffalo to survive

Originally posted by Hyperion Prime
Galadiator can be just as ruthless. But let's say he isn't. How does that automatically give Adam the win. If ruthlessnes is king then why doesn't the Joker rule the multiverse?

Black Adam cares about things also

Galactus destroys planets to survive like humans destroy heards of Buffalo to survive

Are you friggin ignorant?

He just said that BRUTALITY DOES NOT WIN A FIGHT.

YOU were the one that tried to put Black Adam and Gladiator on the same level of ruthlessness. Bran objected. Simple.

Originally posted by Hyperion Prime
Galadiator can be just as ruthless. But let's say he isn't. How does that automatically give Adam the win. If ruthlessnes is king then why doesn't the Joker rule the multiverse?

Black Adam cares about things also

Galactus destroys planets to survive like humans destroy heards of Buffalo to survive

Also, no, Gladiator cannot be as ruthless, because he has never been either. I can say I'm going to kill someone, but can I, have I?
No.

The other difference between them, is not only is Black Adam more powerful, but he won't hesitate to kill him. That is how ruthlessness comes into this thread.
Either way, it still doesn't equal a win.

Yes, Black Adam cares about things... point? When those things died, he waged a war against the rest of the world, he killed heroes because they didn't listen to him. He publically ripped an old villian of Superman in half, just because he was a villian (before his family died).

Yes, but you just said that Juggernaut could beat Galactus just because he is supposedly more ruthless, which he isn't.

Originally posted by Hyperion Prime

Galactus destroys planets to survive like humans destroy heards of Buffalo to survive

That doesn't make a whole lot of sense. 😕 Galactus didn't wipe out all the planets in the universe. And we didn't need to kill all the herds to survive. But, we killed off almost all the buffalo and rendered a few of the species of them extinct. The only time Galactus has come close to that is when the black Celestial made his hunger insatiable.

Edit: Speaking in terms of scale, of course.

Originally posted by Jebus reborn
What the f*ck are you talking about?

Also, no, Gladiator cannot be as ruthless, because he has never been either. I can say I'm going to kill someone, but can I, have I?
No.

The other difference between them, is not only is Black Adam more powerful, but he won't hesitate to kill him. That is how ruthlessness comes into this thread.
Either way, it still doesn't equal a win.

Yes, Black Adam cares about things... point? When those things died, he waged a war against the rest of the world, he killed heroes because they didn't listen to him. He publically ripped an old villian of Superman in half, just because he was a villian (before his family died).

Yes, but you just said that Juggernaut could beat Galactus just because he is supposedly more ruthless, which he isn't.

Gladiator beat beast and Wolverine almost to death and were ready to kill the x-men. They would've been dead hadn't Plutonia found Smasher.

Originally posted by Soljer
No....nine out of ten is murder.

Teth would beat the Hulk at LEAST that often.

That might be your opinion which you're entitled to, but nothing in comics supports that he'd beat him 9/10.

That's overrating him a wee bit.

Originally posted by UniOmni
That might be your opinion which you're entitled to, but nothing in comics supports that he'd beat him 9/10.

That's overrating him a wee bit.

I say 7-8/10 for BA

I mean I think it would be a great battle. I think Glads is a little faster speed wise and maybe a little stronger but I think BA is also a lot more skilled and that helps a lot in a fight like this.

Originally posted by Validus
What odds do you give him?

Against Gladiator?

Teth vs Hulk?

Teth 6.5 times out of ten.

If he used his speed as often as Superman, let alone Flash, he'd get 9/10.

And before people come in ranting about leagues above in strength and Hulk needing a long time to reach the level, that's simply not the case.

He gets angry, and he gets dominant.

What he does.

Doesn't matter if he faces Herc, Thor or whoever.

So why you are bitching about 9/10 when you just gave him 9/10 when using super speed?

He conveniently neglected to mention the lightning punches and calling down the thunderbolt.