Weakest sith to ever exist

Started by Advent11 pages

And you're still here. Trolling. This must be your newest hobby.

Originally posted by Advent
And you're still here. Trolling. This must be your newest hobby.

And you're still here. Evading. This must be your newest hobby.

I can do that, too.

Really, Advent, either way, I still win. You can evade to your heart's content; everyone else will still see you running from something.

😉

What have I run from? I've argued this with you and Mr. Anderson for some four pages. I'm continuing this debate in my own thread. Did you somehow think everyone would overlook that? Now you're asking me to give you George Lucas' words on Anakin having the highest potential and questioning how good Chris Cerasi is at his job.

Originally posted by Advent
What have I run from?

I honestly don't know, sugarbear. That's what I'm here to find out. You come here with borrowed arguments straight from Illustrious's failbag of tricks and you've become the Tazmanian Devil of backpeddling. I don't know what you're running from.

But running is never the answer.

Unless you're being attacked by polar bears.

I've argued this with you and Mr. Anderson for some four pages.

We have very different standards of what constitutes "arguing."

Plz retaliate with "troll."

I'm continuing this debate in my own thread. Did you somehow think everyone would overlook that? Now you're asking me to give you George Lucas' words on Anakin having the highest potential and questioning how good Chris Cerasi is at his job.

Yes, I need you to provide me the quote about Anakin's potential. It's critical to myyour argument.

Originally posted by Advent

[b]Stop trolling
.

learn the definition of trolling.

I'm wrong either way? How can I be wrong on something I'm not arguing? Oh? What's that? I can't? You're using a strawman? And in the most obvious way? Good game.

Oh, snap! a strawman of a strawman. what a parody that would be? too bad i didn't use a strawman.

Firstly, quotes - my Buddha, quotes stating "the most powerful of X". Not showings of power, not the character's knowledge or abilities, but simply: a quote. As I've explained, these quotes about "being the most powerful ever (past, present, future)" are just bullshit. The problem I have is when you state that according to canon character X is better than character Y based on just these encompassing quotes, which are not descriptive action or anything of the sort.

Nobody gives a shit if they warp your pitiful interpretation of a fictional universe. Canon is canon, and the quote is canon. Representing the quote is bullshit on no other grounds than the quote doesn't give you a "why".

For example, there is nothing that he looks to that says -absolutely- Sidious is more powerful than Ragnos or Nihilus.

Wrong!! The darkside source book says so definitely, as does Dark Empire.


It's dependent on the author and his interpretation of the characters or what's needed for the story. Which Chris Cerasi, editor for LucasBooks, confirms.
apparently the author states that sidious is the most powerful sith in history.

That means, in most cases, that we're examining the characters and deciding who's better than who.
Sure, absolutely, except when we have absolute narrative that claims someone is the best.
That's the whole point of a hypothetical Vs. match and the entire sub-forum! LucasBooks' canon apparently doesn't give a shit about Yoda vs. Caedus...so, is it their view that Yoda is more powerful than Caedus?
No Idea, but they said sidious is the most powerful sith in history, so its obvious their view is that sidious is more powerful than revan or nihilus. The author's interpretation says so, as does anyone who owns a pair of brain cells and has read the quotes.

We don't know. We have no idea if Yoda could beat Caedus in a straight fight. Nothing canon says definitively.
insufficient. the canon states that sidious is the most powerful sith in history.

That's all. "Not because some quotes saying that [they] are". And this is why the Vs. forum exists. Instead of hiding behind ambiguous phrases and hyperbole, we actually put down some substance. Or am I wrong? Do you guys enjoy "LOL YODA CONFIRMED MOST POWERFUL JEDI UP TO PT! ROTS NOVEL NUB. U LOSE!" type of debate?
that is substance. The most powerful foe the darkness had ever known will defeat any other foes of the darkness, quite obviously. Interpretation can and will render the entire vs forum pointless. I can interpret anything i want to into the movies. I interpret that vader broke through obi-wan's soresu in episode 4 and defeated him making vader's djem so better than obi wan's soresu, or that vader was more powerful than sidious because he killed him.

It doesn't work.


Yawn.

I'm "commonly known as a moron"? That's news to this whole forum again. You should become the KMC Newscaster.


Well, i guess so because everyone knows it now.

You are such a coxcomb.

hmmmmm is this as dirty as i want it to be?

Did you realize people [at least when I debated regularly] considered me among the most knowledgeable, proficient debaters? Yes, that includes Lightsnake, Dr. McBeefington, Elite Hunter and the resident forum troll retired debater: Gideon.

musta gotten senile since then. All the technique and proficiency in "debating" won't help you if you are wrong. And you, sir, are wrong. Might I also point out that this is nowhere near debating, this is an internet argument. This is where we both yell our opinions until we are bored and never concede.


Hell, my first mega-post on the forum earned praise from Janus, IKC and Illustrious. From Janus so much so that he invited me to his original forum when it first started and even asked me to take over in a debate for him.

Ah the good old days, i might as well just send out for some ice cold lemonade as long as we are sitting here on your black granny's porch. I don't give a flying f**k about your "legendary proficiency" in debating and how everyone loved you back in the old days. I'm thrilled that you have that much flexibility now that you are in your proverbial golden age as a debater, as you manage to retain proficiency in sucking your own dick and kissing your own ass.

Frankly, if I had a phallus on this forum, it'd be huge. But enough about my accolades on the Vs. forum, what have you done here other than cement your stupidity in history with non-editable posts?

I'm not the type to write a three paragraph essay concerning how awesome i was back when we were still waiting for star wars III. It's off topic, it's vain, it's pointless, and it gives you a reputation as an egotistical autophiliac.

Yes, considering you can't even spell "friend" right, I'm not sure why you feel to the need to attempt to please your clearly undersized e-peen by challenging my intellect.
I'm sorry, thank you for pointing out my type-o. It makes me feel good to know that when I accidentally switch two letters, while writing at 45 wpm Senility will catch up with me.[/B]

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
This is where we both yell our opinions until we are bored and never concede. [/B]

Why was anything more than this necessary?

. The most powerful foe the darkness had ever known will defeat any other foes of the darkness, quite obviously.

A (the one quoted as more powerful) hasn't slept for a month, has all his limbs broken and is high as a kite on morphine. He must fight B (one not quite as powerful), who is in possession of the Lightsaber of wtfpwnage, which cuts through anything (even other lightsabers) and is a mile long in diameter and length. Who wins?

Originally posted by Nephthys
A (the one quoted as more powerful) hasn't slept for a month, has all his limbs broken and is high as a kite on morphine. He must fight B (one not quite as powerful), who is in possession of the Lightsaber of wtfpwnage, which cuts through anything (even other lightsabers) and is a mile long in diameter and length. Who wins?
smartass.

I can't help it, my ass was blessed from birth.

Originally posted by Gideon
But running is never the answer.
Unless you're being attacked by polar bears.
What if they are grizzly or American balck bears? Then do you run, or die?

Originally posted by Nephthys
I can't help it, my ass was blessed from birth.
Probably the only part of your body you could call smart. :/

or big.

Originally posted by Incanus
What if they are grizzly or American balck bears? Then do you run, or die?
lay down face down and put your hands on the back of your head with the fingers interlocked. They won't be able to claw your face and will have a hard time pulling you over to slash your vitals. If you can convince them you are dead, that's a good thing too.

Wait, so if i have a 10 guage shotgun with 2 shots at point blank range, i shouldnt fire?

yes they make 10 guages, most powerful of all, no better ones. Blow you on your ass if you dont have you back to something.

No, you shouldn't. buckshot will only annoy as will bird shot. If you have slugs, you can use those.

Anderson @ Advent
you manage to retain proficiency in sucking your own dick
...

Interesting.

Was talking about 1 of buck 1 slug, buckshot loaded. Btw, remember its point blank, with a shotgun that could most likely penetratee steel at that range. Maybe 1/2 inch or so.

well then i would suggest firing. Have you seen a grizzly though? If you don't do a fatal instant kill shot you are probably going on a long ride on its razor sharp claws straight to hell, especially if you make it mad.

Yeah, pretty much. Muskets are worthless, but 10 guages will blow it head off, or give it a good look at its intestines.

Originally posted by Eminence
...

Interesting.

...

Extremely.

haermm

I'd run. Trading some definite injuries for some or none seems logical to me.