Originally posted by D_Dude1210 I'll have to reread the scan, I don't recall anything that said that the consciousness was switched off, but even then, it seemed to point to a more "physical" consciousness more than the intangible consciousness you alluded to.
If you want it to mean that. that's fine, I only go by what's depicted on panel artistically,
and then corroborated in Handbooks.
(a combination of the two is undebatable, if it's just On Panel showings, that's good enough)
Originally posted by D_Dude1210 You fail to see my point. It seems to be indicated in the scan that the "consciousness" they alluded to wass simply a part of the brain's function (or at least the Fury's brain). Meaning that the attack is NOT AN OMNIVERSAL/TEMPORAL attack. But one that targets the brain.
Scatterbrain attacks the Consciousness, it's as simple as that,
I'm starting to not care what your point is,
since it ha nothing to do with Scatterbrain.
Scatterbrain expands the actual Consciousness across the Omniverse,
it is stated On Panel to be a Time-based effect!!
Scatterbrain can manipulate the scale of this attack,
so as to not fry everyone she uses it on.
Good lord.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210 Meaning, we still need to go back to my point that being able to resist Scatterbrain's attack has NOTHING to do with resisting anything Omniversal OR Temporal.
That's you unsupported opinion,
which without proof is inconsequential.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210 Again, an example would be that Sentry throws enemies into the sun as a means to defeat them, being able resist being thrown into the sun by avoiding him grabbing you does NOT mean that you can resist the sun's heat.
Irrelevant analogy.
This has nothing to do with Scatterbrain, and her power.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210 Both are attacks that target a brain function with different effects. Calling one simply a TP attack and the other an "Omniversal-Temporal" attack is just silly.
We'll see who's "silly" in about 1.7 seconds.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210 Cool. Post the scan, even tho I've seen the scan 100x already. It would be nice to get a refresher. I believe that you simply read into it too much and exaggerated the effect like 1000000fold.
You saw the scans "100x already" and still didn't realize what it depicted/said?
And you call me "silly?" 😆
And I "exaggerated the scan 1000000fold?"
************
Look down below in the next Post ...
... then see who's talking out of their ass,
calling others "silly"
and accusing others of "exaggerating the scans 1000000fold" ...