Originally posted by h1a8
Contruct doesn't prove he pulled. Although the past has no bearing on the future in general, no past feat had him pulling the Earth with that construct.
Sigh. The -combination- of the DIALOGUE, construct and past feats make it so. Sheesh. Think for 10 seconds please.
Originally posted by h1a8
How can it be clear that Hal pulled when it isn't. Your logic sucks. A truly objective person could clearly see that it isn't clear. Superman statement contradicts it. Why would the writer have Superman say contradictory things? Superman felt the exact force Starbreaker was exerting. You can't do this if someone is assisting in the pulling.
MY LOGIC SUCKS??? Your argument is that "it's a figure of speech".
A TRULY OBJECTIVE PERSON??? You talking about yourself?!?! OH THE IRONY!!!!
I guess to you:
"I know I can feel it! It's as if Starbreaker's pull was growing stronger somehow!"
Seems to provide more proof of whether he had PULLING HELP than:
"We've got to pull the planet back into place."
HAHAHAH. LOLOLOL.
You sir, just elevated stupidity into an art form. I take my hat off to you!
Originally posted by h1a8
I admitted just to end the moot argument. All that matters to me is that Superman exerted more than 50 Earth weights of force (even if he was being assisted in the pulling part). With all my heart I believe Hal didn't pull but held the construct together (it was cracking). The pictures are clearer to him not pulling as well as Superman's statement.
OUR debate was -never- about the 50 Earth weights of force or any such feats please stop trying to insert. It was about you being wrong about Superman pulling planets without help. I proved you wrong and you're just too much of an ignorant, arrogant noob to admit how wrong you were.
Which takes me to this little claim you made some time back:
Originally posted by h1a8
Trust me, I'm a very humble person, more humble than anyone of this forum. Some of the best posters (Darthgoober, etc.) have convinced me and made me sway in the other direction. I have changed my opinions here many times and have admitted to it. I'm only stubborn when someone isn't providing me a good argument that convinces me of my so called delusions.
Just more BS that you spit out, I guess.