Dracula vs Ogun

Started by Trackz7 pages

Originally posted by Creshosk
So, you think Ogun wins this fight?
I dont know enough about ogun to pass that judgement, nice try though

Oh and heres something else I said BEFORE this thread.

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
I think at this stage I may give it to Ogun, but I still dont think its a foregone conclusion. I might write a more detailed post later.

Pure fail Cresh.

Originally posted by Trackz
I dont know enough about ogun to pass that judgement, nice try though
Uh huh. You're just saying that because I predicted you would.

You want to argue for Dracula. You really really do... but you know that doing so would prove me right, and prove that there potential bias inherent in the system.

So the only way you can keep from doing that is to not do what you want to do.

Its win win for me, since I think Ogun wins this fight

Originally posted by Creshosk
Uh huh. You're just saying that because I predicted you would.

You want to argue for Dracula. You really really do... but you know that doing so would prove me right, and prove that there potential bias inherent in the system.

So the only way you can keep from doing that is to not do what you want to do.

You cant read but now you're telepathic. 👆

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Oh and heres something else I said BEFORE this thread.

Pure fail Cresh.

Until you actually start arguing for Ogun, you've proven me right.

Because I note there's hesitation... doubt is implicit in your post as well.

But like I said in my above post.

Either way, I win.

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
You cant read but now you're telepathic. 👆
I can read just fine. You just don't like being predicted. Which you proved in the Sabertooth thread when I predicted your fail logic that attempts to violate the VS forum rules.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Until you actually start arguing for Ogun, you've proven me right.

Because I note there's hesitation... doubt is implicit in your post as well.

But like I said in my above post.

Either way, I win.

facepalm I was arguing for Ogun before this thread was created.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Uh huh. You're just saying that because I predicted you would.

You want to argue for Dracula. You really really do... but you know that doing so would prove me right, and prove that there potential bias inherent in the system.

So the only way you can keep from doing that is to not do what you want to do.

Its win win for me, since I think Ogun wins this fight

...now you're calling me a liar to further prove your point than admit that your judgement may have slightly been flawed, check any thread the marvels best swordsman thread and see if i was amoung the members to say dracula should be considered the greatest swordsman.
About me at least, you are wrong. Good job trying to decide my opinion though...

Originally posted by Creshosk
I can read just fine. You just don't like being predicted. Which you proved in the Sabertooth thread when I predicted your fail logic that attempts to violate the VS forum rules.

No you cant you misinterpreted a post were I was argung for both Drac and Ogun, you read it as arguing for Drac OVER Ogun.

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
facepalm I was arguing for Ogun before this thread was created.
Not weith things like "I feel like giving it to ogun but..."

Argue for him concretely.

Originally posted by Trackz
...now you're calling me a liar to further prove your point
I didn't call you a liar. I said what your motivations were.

Originally posted by Trackz
than admit that your judgement may have slightly been flawed,
Its not.

Prove it is.. argue for ogun and mean it.

Originally posted by Trackz
check any thread the marvels best swordsman thread and see if i was amoung the members to say dracula should be considered the greatest swordsman.
About me at least, you are wrong. Good job trying to decide my opinion though...
Not yet I'm not.. Prove me wrong. Argue for Ogun. Concretely.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Not weith things like "I feel like giving it to ogun but..."

Argue for him concretely.

CONTEXT. All that means is I dont think its concrete that Ogun is the better swordsman. However my past post indicates that I dont think Dracula is better than Ogun either, so im still not arguing for Dracula being BETTER than Ogun, so you still fail hard.

Originally posted by Creshosk
I didn't call you a liar. I said what your motivations were.

Its not.

Prove it is.. argue for ogun and mean it.

Not yet I'm not.. Prove me wrong. Argue for Ogun. Concretely.

you have nothing to support your claims outside of one example in which i used dracula to say that the idea that sabretooth would run circles around balde was false

why would i argue for a character i know nothing about

Creshock, you have come to the right place, subconsciously seeking help. Where else would be your way too high sense of self-importance diagnosed?

Originally posted by Trackz
you have nothing to support your claims outside of one example in which i used dracula to say that the idea that sabretooth would run circles around balde was false

why would i argue for a character i know nothing about

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
CONTEXT. All that means is I dont think its concrete that Ogun is the better swordsman. However my past post indicates that I dont think Dracula is better than Ogun either, so im still not arguing for Dracula being BETTER than Ogun, so you still fail hard.
So until you start arguing concretely for Ogun you have not disproven my theory.

Is that really that hard to understand?

AS soon as either of you argue for dracula.. you prove my point.

Originally posted by Survivor19
Creshock, you have come to the right place, subconsciously seeking help. Where else would be your way too high sense of self-importance would be diagnosed?
And you I'm reporting for trolling and member bashing.

Originally posted by Creshosk
So until you start arguing concretely for Ogun you have not disproven my theory.

Is that really that hard to understand?

facepalm

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
facepalm
I'll take that as a yes.

Either argue for Ogun and prove me right that Ogun wins.
Or Argue for dracula and prove me right that those that argue for blade argue for dracula.

Ogun does win by the way.

Guys, if you can't get along then use the ignore.

Originally posted by Badabing
Guys, if you can't get along then use the ignore.

Ignored. 😐

biscuits

Just doesnt come over when I do it. 🙁

Originally posted by Creshosk
I'll take that as a yes.

Either argue for Ogun and prove me right that Ogun wins.
Or Argue for dracula and prove me right that those that argue for blade argue for dracula.

Ogun does win by the way.

many things wrong with your theory

1. arguing for ogun would prove nothing seeing as i don't know anything about the character
2. just because one thinks dracula can beat someone, that doesn't automatically prove that they think blade can consequently beat him, perfect exampele would be survivor who is arguing for dracula i believe, but i doubt he thinks blade could handle ogun
3. you're wrong, you're basically telling pepole how they feel about a situation so it justifies your theory and output of the battle, basically if someone doesn't think ogun wins they're a blade fanboy, despite dracula being leagues above blade in terms of overall power, I might argue dracula could give apocalypse a fight, that doesn't mean I think blade could so much as phase apocalypse.