Originally posted by TrackzUh huh. You're just saying that because I predicted you would.
I dont know enough about ogun to pass that judgement, nice try though
You want to argue for Dracula. You really really do... but you know that doing so would prove me right, and prove that there potential bias inherent in the system.
So the only way you can keep from doing that is to not do what you want to do.
Its win win for me, since I think Ogun wins this fight
Originally posted by Creshosk
Uh huh. You're just saying that because I predicted you would.You want to argue for Dracula. You really really do... but you know that doing so would prove me right, and prove that there potential bias inherent in the system.
So the only way you can keep from doing that is to not do what you want to do.
You cant read but now you're telepathic. 👆
Originally posted by Creshosk...now you're calling me a liar to further prove your point than admit that your judgement may have slightly been flawed, check any thread the marvels best swordsman thread and see if i was amoung the members to say dracula should be considered the greatest swordsman.
Uh huh. You're just saying that because I predicted you would.You want to argue for Dracula. You really really do... but you know that doing so would prove me right, and prove that there potential bias inherent in the system.
So the only way you can keep from doing that is to not do what you want to do.
Its win win for me, since I think Ogun wins this fight
Originally posted by Creshosk
I can read just fine. You just don't like being predicted. Which you proved in the Sabertooth thread when I predicted your fail logic that attempts to violate the VS forum rules.
No you cant you misinterpreted a post were I was argung for both Drac and Ogun, you read it as arguing for Drac OVER Ogun.
Originally posted by TrackzI didn't call you a liar. I said what your motivations were.
...now you're calling me a liar to further prove your point
Originally posted by TrackzIts not.
than admit that your judgement may have slightly been flawed,
Prove it is.. argue for ogun and mean it.
Originally posted by TrackzNot yet I'm not.. Prove me wrong. Argue for Ogun. Concretely.
check any thread the marvels best swordsman thread and see if i was amoung the members to say dracula should be considered the greatest swordsman.
About me at least, you are wrong. Good job trying to decide my opinion though...
Originally posted by Creshosk
Not weith things like "I feel like giving it to ogun but..."Argue for him concretely.
CONTEXT. All that means is I dont think its concrete that Ogun is the better swordsman. However my past post indicates that I dont think Dracula is better than Ogun either, so im still not arguing for Dracula being BETTER than Ogun, so you still fail hard.
Originally posted by Creshoskyou have nothing to support your claims outside of one example in which i used dracula to say that the idea that sabretooth would run circles around balde was false
I didn't call you a liar. I said what your motivations were.Its not.
Prove it is.. argue for ogun and mean it.
Not yet I'm not.. Prove me wrong. Argue for Ogun. Concretely.
why would i argue for a character i know nothing about
Originally posted by Trackz
you have nothing to support your claims outside of one example in which i used dracula to say that the idea that sabretooth would run circles around balde was falsewhy would i argue for a character i know nothing about
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneSo until you start arguing concretely for Ogun you have not disproven my theory.
CONTEXT. All that means is I dont think its concrete that Ogun is the better swordsman. However my past post indicates that I dont think Dracula is better than Ogun either, so im still not arguing for Dracula being BETTER than Ogun, so you still fail hard.
Is that really that hard to understand?
AS soon as either of you argue for dracula.. you prove my point.
Originally posted by Survivor19And you I'm reporting for trolling and member bashing.
Creshock, you have come to the right place, subconsciously seeking help. Where else would be your way too high sense of self-importance would be diagnosed?
Originally posted by Creshosk
I'll take that as a yes.Either argue for Ogun and prove me right that Ogun wins.
Or Argue for dracula and prove me right that those that argue for blade argue for dracula.Ogun does win by the way.
many things wrong with your theory
1. arguing for ogun would prove nothing seeing as i don't know anything about the character
2. just because one thinks dracula can beat someone, that doesn't automatically prove that they think blade can consequently beat him, perfect exampele would be survivor who is arguing for dracula i believe, but i doubt he thinks blade could handle ogun
3. you're wrong, you're basically telling pepole how they feel about a situation so it justifies your theory and output of the battle, basically if someone doesn't think ogun wins they're a blade fanboy, despite dracula being leagues above blade in terms of overall power, I might argue dracula could give apocalypse a fight, that doesn't mean I think blade could so much as phase apocalypse.