How do you think the world will end?

Started by Morgromir6 pages

Who knows maybe The Norse were right ,Ragnarok comes , Gods fight, the Einherjar fight , everything dies .

I would really like to know whats first Christianity or the old norse, cause this copy from Wikipedia sounds like the Adam and eve story at the end .

"... the occurrence of various natural disasters, and the subsequent submersion of the world in water. Afterwards, the world resurfaces anew and fertile, the surviving gods meet, and the world is repopulated by two human survivors."

well one flaw i see is that No species can survive with only 2 ,the flaws would be the same in every generation, one disease comes up cough , cough, they all die
However if the gods are present they might be able to give some kind of protection . but still . and to me Baldr seems similiar Jesus in several ways .

The versions of the Norse stories that exist today are known to be strongly influenced by missionaries. Norse mythology was an oral tradition for most of its existence, only being codified after a lot of interaction with other cultures, and as a result tracking down unaltered versions is essentially impossible.

nuclear war. buncha dead humans instantly, then buncha dead humans later.

both instant gratification and delayed gratification. 🙂

Originally posted by siriuswriter
nuclear war. buncha dead humans instantly, then buncha dead humans later.

both instant gratification and delayed gratification. 🙂

That is a possibility, but I don't see a major nuclear power initiating a First Strike. They know they would be getting it in return...so, it is a lose-lose situation.

The only real threat is a rogue terrorist organization setting off a nuke somewhere. However, as much damage as one nuke could do, they wouldn't have enough to start a full scale nuclear exchange. I think the only plausable way a full nuclear war could commence is if the Big Three(U.S., Russia, and China) started unloading on each other.

12/12/2012

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Oh no, It's solid evidence.... If the world doesn't end in 2012 I'd be very suprised...........................

dood if you're gonna preach 2012, you wanna get your facts straight first. Yes the mayan calander ends 21st December 2012, Yes we will see significant change in that time. But the world is not going to end, Life as we know it will, as we evolve in conciousness. For all those who dont believe or what not, just shut your mouths we have over just 3 years left. It should be a positive and exciting time for all.

Originally posted by SuperkatmanX
dood if you're gonna preach 2012, you wanna get your facts straight first. Yes the mayan calander ends 21st December 2012, Yes we will see significant change in that time. But the world is not going to end, Life as we know it will, as we evolve in conciousness. For all those who dont believe or what not, just shut your mouths we have over just 3 years left. It should be a positive and exciting time for all.

But look, you understand why people are skeptic about those theories as there is little evidence for them, right?

There will be a virus that turns humans into zombies.

I think mankind will just die out, then the sun will explode, a very long time from now...

Originally posted by Bardock42
But look, you understand why people are skeptic about those theories as there is little evidence for them, right?

There is PLENTY of evidence out there, you just have to make the simplest move as of to look.

Obama.

Originally posted by SuperkatmanX
There is PLENTY of evidence out there, you just have to make the simplest move as of to look.
Oh sounds interesting, maybe you can give me a summary of some of the facts and then point me in the right direction?

I'd also like to know how you found out about the information.

Originally posted by Scythe
I think mankind will just die out, then the sun will explode, a very long time from now...
Probably. By then the Earth will be nothing but a big ass rock with no life.

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
That is a possibility, but I don't see a major nuclear power initiating a First Strike. They know they would be getting it in return...so, it is a lose-lose situation.

The only real threat is a rogue terrorist organization setting off a nuke somewhere. However, as much damage as one nuke could do, they wouldn't have enough to start a full scale nuclear exchange. I think the only plausable way a full nuclear war could commence is if the Big Three(U.S., Russia, and China) started unloading on each other.

if this were to happen, my theory would be that one of the big three would be testing something or other, and whatever is made by man cannot be perfect, i mean, the tiniest tiniest of ratios can still happen, so boom... autoalerts go off, and before a human can even unlock the system that unlocks the system that unlocks the door to the room where the callback failsafe button is, half of the world will be in range.

[yes, i've watched about every black and white movie about the 'red threat'}

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Probably. By then the Earth will be nothing but a big ass rock with no life.

That is the outcome.

I'd think massive polution could be a factor. So we better start terraforming and colonizing other planets and/or moons. Get a fresh start on the garbage issue. Turn one planet into a dump and move on.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'd think massive polution could be a factor. So we better start terraforming and colonizing other planets and/or moons. Get a fresh start on the garbage issue. Turn one planet into a dump and move on.

That could be a non-issue. We will be so heavily integrated with our technology and be living in virtual worlds that by the time we reach the point of being able to terraform and colonize other planets, organic human life will be approaching extinction duh to the uselessness of flesh.

We will, however start terraforming other planets into useful computing materials....turning everything into a giant super computer built to be part of the whole. (Think Coruscant, but instead of a city planet, it's a computer planet.)

Originally posted by dadudemon
That could be a non-issue. We will be so heavily integrated with our technology and be living in virtual worlds that by the time we reach the point of being able to terraform and colonize other planets, organic human life will be approaching extinction duh to the uselessness of flesh.

We will, however start terraforming other planets into useful computing materials....turning everything into a giant super computer built to be part of the whole. (Think Coruscant, but instead of a city planet, it's a computer planet.)

I think changing a planet's atmosphere to suit human needs will come before making a planet into Unicron, tech-wise.

Originally posted by Robtard
I think changing a planet's atmosphere to suit human needs will come before making a planet into Unicron, tech-wise.

K. You could be right.

I subscribe to Kurzweil's thoughts on it, which explains our difference in opinion. I pratically swing from that dude's nuts. He's what I would call a REAL prophet, lol.

I don't think the world will end -- at least not for a good long while. If it does end, it will be because of ignorance and human intolerance that we so love to spread around like a disease.