Originally posted by Bardock42
What do you think changed that made High Fidelity worse for our time?? (edit: worse than Underworld 3 😐)
You're joking, right? (I know you're not. I'm making a smug comment because I'm cool like you.)
Originally posted by Bardock42
Anyways, I'd probably rate all the movies I named in my profile as 8.5 or above.
I don't look at profiles. I have facebook for that.
But, I'll take a look at yours. You wanna see mine? It is HIGHLY customized n'stuff.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I never saw Trainspotting.I never saw Little Miss Sunshine.
I saw The Princess Bride. It was good. Maybe a 8 or 9.
I haven't seen The Big Lebowski.
For it's time, High Fidelity was AWESOME. If I saw it during it's time, I would probably rate it an 8 or 9. I rate it a 7, these days.
you never saw Trainspotting 🙁 🙁 😄
Originally posted by Sancty
http://www.twilightmoms.com/ 😐
It's hard or me to picture you as anything but the cute asian lady you are using, even when you are pwning mods.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You're joking, right? (I know you're not. I'm making a smug comment because I'm cool like you.)I don't look at profiles. I have facebook for that.
But, I'll take a look at yours. You wanna see mine? It is HIGHLY customized n'stuff.
Were you making a joke about the High Fidelity thing? I can't tell, I think you might, it wouldn't be too funny, but on the other hand it is not an uncommon idea that fils get worse with time (or better).
Oh I don't mean for you to break such an honorable belief, I was just saying that there was a list of movies that would fall in the category you asked of me, if you were still interested.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Were you making a joke about the High Fidelity thing? I can't tell, I think you might, it wouldn't be too funny, but on the other hand it is not an uncommon idea that fils get worse with time (or better).
I was serious.
I saw it just a few years ago. I've seen it once.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh I don't mean for you to break such an honorable belief, I was just saying that there was a list of movies that would fall in the category you asked of me, if you were still interested.
Cool.
Will do.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I was serious.I saw it just a few years ago. I've seen it once.
Cool.
Will do.
So could you explain to me why you think it was a 9 in 2000, but is a mere 7 now? What made it so good at its time that is missing now?
I mean, 2 points dude. High Fidelity just as good as Van Helsing. I'd like to know.
Originally posted by Insomniatric
The sunlight? Who's bright idea was it to make the VAMPIRES (creatures of the night) able to go into the light?
Actually, considering that there are many, many myths about vampires, them being able to go out during the day is actually possible. Not all myths have vampires only able to go out at night.
Sparkling is just really stupid, though. The only reason someone should sparkle is if a tub of glitter's been dumped on them.
Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
you never saw Trainspotting 🙁 🙁 😄
No. Bardock tried to convince me to watch it, one day. I have it in my Netflix queue from that IM convo. It is approaching a year ago when Bardock suggested that film. Seriously, that's how many films I have in my queue.
Originally posted by Sancty
What do you mean even when I'm pwning mods? oh Liek Hwang Mi-Hee couldn't pwn a mod? oh
I'm sure Digi would gladly let her pwn him. 😄
Originally posted by Bardock42
So could you explain to me why you think it was a 9 in 2000, but is a mere 7 now? What made it so good at its time that is missing now?
1. Pay attention.
Originally posted by dadudemon
For it's time, High Fidelity was AWESOME. If I saw it during it's time, I would probably rate it an 8 or 9. I rate it a 7, these days.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I mean, 2 points dude. High Fidelity just as good as Van Helsing. I'd like to know.
2. You should pay attention if you wanted your questions answered before you posted.
Ewwwwwww sick burn. PWNed on teh intertubez!!!!!
Originally posted by dadudemon
It's hard or me to picture you as anything but the cute asian lady you are using, even when you are pwning mods.
But she didn't 'pwn' Digi 😛 Pointing out a community made up of a tiny number of fans when he pointed out that usually the fans are a different audience is not 'pwning' someone.
Originally posted by dadudemon
1. Pay attention.2. You should pay attention if you wanted your questions answered before you posted.
Ewwwwwww sick burn. PWNed on teh intertubez!!!!!
...okay you pwned me there. I totally didn't see that.
Could you now explain to me why you would have rated it as "8 or 9" in 2000 ("it's time"😉) but rate it as 7 now in 2009?
Originally posted by Peach
But she didn't 'pwn' Digi 😛 Pointing out a community made up of a tiny number of fans when he pointed out that usually the fans are a different audience is not 'pwning' someone.
He has a loose definition of pwn, it is funny though that there is a rather vocal hardcore-fan community that doesn't fit Digi's "13 year old" category (though, nowadays who knows)
Originally posted by Bardock42
He has a loose definition of pwn, it is funny though that there is a rather vocal hardcore-fan community that doesn't fit Digi's "13 year old" category (though, nowadays who knows)
There are some absolutely batshit insane Twilight fans. Including older ones.
But the vast majority are younger teenaged girls, and for the most part, the older fans are not as likely to buy into the trash spouted in the book.
Originally posted by Peach
There are some absolutely batshit insane Twilight fans. Including older ones.But the vast majority are younger teenaged girls, and for the most part, the older fans are not as likely to buy into the trash spouted in the book.
But, I don't know very many 13-year-old girls. 😐