Originally posted by Spire
😆Your so oblivious it is unbelievable.
A lame backpedal, then several stupid irrelevant assertions that have nothing to do with anything.
More flaming? Is that ALL you're capable of?
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
I'll no longer reply to your flaming. I'm going back to discussing BRB vs SS and how BRB was OWNED in that fight.As to the debate on why it was proven that BRB got OWNED:
My points:
1) BRB was unable to visibly harm the Surfer in his 2 succesful attacks.
2) The Surfer visibly damaged BRB in his 3 attacks. BRB ended up bloodied and in a fetal position (w/c visibly demonstrates the extent of ownage that was done to him).
3) The Surfer using his board is a valid tactic that is part of his powerset. He used it because it was the smartest tactic at the time, not due to any sort of implied need.
4) There is NO PROOF that the Surfer was EVER in a position where he needed to "resort" to anything (even tho some would try to imply this).
5) There is NO PROOF that BRB stopped/hesitated in his attack (even tho some would try to imply this).
6) The fight did not END when the board struck, it merely gave the Surfer the advantage, allowing him to finish BRB off. Furthermore, stating "when the fight ended" is subjective as well as irrelevant as it has little to no bearing on BRB's Ownage.
7) The Surfer was not "shutdown". The fact that he still had his board as an option CLEARLY and DECISIVELY proves this.Now, those are some relevant arguments to the debate. Are you going to man up and debate these points?
Give your rebuttal or concede. OR is that too much for you?