Blade vs Daken

Started by Phantom Zone24 pages
Originally posted by Creshosk
🙂

FACEPALM!

Originally posted by Trackz
...walked up behind her? have you seen their encounter, they were facing each other and shaking hands and staked her while they were talking, but ofcourse this isn't remotely impressive..however in their second encounter when tensions are higher and blade stops to talk, and she attacks him this is blade getting owned...

no i believe blade pulled out the vial before he could react, that way the writer could end the fight in a stalemate as intended.

So you openly admit that it was a sucker punch and that there was no reason to suspect he was going to be such an uber *******?

Originally posted by Creshosk
🙂
I don't think Blade was going for the kill personally. Do you? I've already asked you this.

Originally posted by Creshosk
So you openly admit that it was a sucker punch and that there was no reason to suspect he was going to be such an uber *******?
i admit it was a sucker punch, jsut as spitfires attack was, but to say a character got owned in one but not the other is a double standard.

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
FACEPALM!
Well naturally you wouldn't think there's a contradiction there. Youre blade blinders are at 100% capacity.

Snoop: Shield told him they wanted to talk.
Snoop: actually Shield said that they didn't care if he was dead or alive.

Snoop: It was obvious he wasn't trying to kill him.
Snoop: Blade could have killed him.

Blade Blinders: No contradiction

No blade blinders: That's not consistent.

Originally posted by Creshosk
So you openly admit that it was a sucker punch and that there was no reason to suspect he was going to be such an uber *******?
It was a sucker shot....she wasn't expecting it. I highly doubt Blade thought Spitfire was gonna judo toss him either.

Originally posted by Trackz
i admit it was a sucker punch, jsut as spitfires attack was,
You mean right after he provoked her bey saying "Let me stake you"?

Guess Blade's a dumbass.

Originally posted by Trackz
but to say a character got owned in one but not the other is a double standard.
Only if blade's a dumbass.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Well naturally you wouldn't think there's a contradiction there. Youre blade blinders are at 100% capacity.

Snoop: Shield told him they wanted to talk.
Snoop: actually Shield said that they didn't care if he was dead or alive.

Snoop: It was obvious he wasn't trying to kill him.
Snoop: Blade could have killed him.

Blade Blinders: No contradiction

No blade blinders: That's not consistent.

Please pay attention.

Shield told Blade they didn't care he was was brought in dead or alive. Blade tells Logan that Shield wanted a word with him and the he was suppose to bring him in. I'm going to assume Blade chose to bring him in alive.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
It was a sucker shot....she wasn't expecting it. I highly doubt Blade thought Spitfire was gonna judo toss him either.
Cause Blade's a dumbass...

Awesome.. glad we got that clear: Death threat to someone won't provoke them into attacking.

Originally posted by Trackz
reacting faster than a superspeedster is impressive,

you believe that wolverine not only in some cases allowed blade t oget hits on him in the fight but allowed blade to stumble around his pockets for a vial, remove his mask, and stick it to his neck? I'm the one with no credibility...yeah youre on ignore.

Well it would be if he ever did that. As it stands as soon as things got into a one on one she was slashing the hell out of him and had him disarmed at the cost of what... two blows?

Fact is blade doesn't have speed feats that put him above the likes of Wolverine... You can continue to think otherwise, and I'll continue to refer to you as the peanut gallery? Okay? Okay!

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Please pay attention.
I am paying attention.. which is why youre arguments aren't holding up.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Shield told Blade they didn't care he was was brought in dead or alive. Blade tells Logan that Shield wanted a word with him and the he was suppose to bring him in. I'm going to assume Blade chose to bring him in alive.
I'm not saying that what happened in the comics isn't consistent. I'm saying what YOU said wasn't consistant.

"It'd give him more options to put him down for good."
vs.
"He wasn't trying to put him down for good."

Why would he need the more options if he wasn't needing or trying for them?

Originally posted by Creshosk
Cause Blade's a dumbass...

Awesome.. glad we got that clear: Death threat to someone won't provoke them into attacking.

Not always.

Originally posted by Creshosk
I am paying attention.. which is why youre arguments aren't holding up.

I'm not saying that what happened in the comics isn't consistent. I'm saying what YOU said wasn't consistant.

"It'd give him more options to put him down for good."
vs.
"He wasn't trying to put him down for good."

Why would he need the more options if he wasn't needing or trying for them?

The vial gave Blade more options to finish Logan in any way he chose fit. What way was that? I don't know.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Cause Blade's a dumbass...

Awesome.. glad we got that clear: Death threat to someone won't provoke them into attacking.

apparently not...after the fight spitfire asked blade to kill her if she couldnt control it, not only that the fight wouldn't have been over if spitfire bit him...since vampire bites have no effect on blade

Originally posted by Trackz
apparently not...after the fight spitfire asked blade to kill her if she couldnt control it, not only that the fight wouldn't have been over if spitfire bit him...since vampire bites have no effect on blade
Blade's been bit more times than Crescock can count.

Blade paid for his mistake by whispering in her ear and she paid for her mistake by.....not biting him....whatever that would have done.

I'd say they were 1-1 on the mishapes but it happens to turn out Spitfire had a adamantium sword to her throat only to be save by the Mindless ones unexpected appearance.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Not always.
You'd still have to be pretty dim to assume that asking someone to kill them wouldn't provoke them.

Originally posted by Trackz
apparently not...after the fight spitfire asked blade to kill her if she couldnt control it, not only that the fight wouldn't have been over if spitfire bit him...since vampire bites have no effect on blade
And separating the heart from the brain by removing the jugular would have no effect?

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Blade's been bit more times than Crescock can count.
Reported. 🙂

Originally posted by Creshosk

Reported. 🙂
😱

Oh no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Blade paid for his mistake by whispering in her ear and she paid for her mistake by.....not biting him....whatever that would have done.

I'd say they were 1-1 on the mishapes but it happens to turn out Spitfire had a adamantium sword to her throat only to be save by the Mindless ones unexpected appearance.

You're right she should have been out of character and ripped his throat out, and then been sick to her stomache about it instead of being sucker punched again by telling him that she was in control and therefore didn't need to be staked.

So Blade only got "wins" on spitfire by sucker punching her.

Awesome.. that really proves he's superior by being an ******* cape killer.

Originally posted by Creshosk
You're right she should have been out of character and ripped his throat out, and then been sick to her stomache about it instead of being sucker punched again by telling him that she was in control and therefore didn't need to be staked.

So Blade only got "wins" on spitfire by sucker punching her.

Awesome.. that really proves he's superior by being an ******* cape killer.

She has a issue with killing innnocents as I've stated...not people trying to kill her aka, Skrulls, Blade, etc.