Originally posted by quanchi112
I disagree. Drax had the power gem. He can't be annihilated while using it unlike the Probes.DD power.
With the advantage in speed, Clark is landing enough probe crushing punches to KO Grey Hulk with ease. Then it is on to the Prof who also enjoys a lack of conciousness due to Kal.
Originally posted by LordofBrooklynI disagree due to Prof. hulk engaging him at the same time. The Hulks overwhelm and ko him.
With the advantage in speed, Clark is landing enough probe crushing punches to KO Grey Hulk with ease. Then it is on to the Prof who also enjoys a lack of conciousness due to Kal.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Black Adam wasn't a remorseless killer. He actually let MM go. I don't think Superman is pulling his punches but he isn't out to kill everyone either IMO.
Originally posted by Badabing
Round 2 - CIS is off and bloodlust is on for Superman. Think of Superman with the rage Black Adam has in WW III.
Making the same comments as always, at some point you should read some comics and TRY to understand them.
Let me help you out because apparently this words in English are to hard for you to understand
blood·lust:
noun
1. uncontrollable desire to kill or maim others.
Killing Men, Women and CHILDREN counts as "blood·lust" 😂
blood·lust:
noun
1. uncontrollable desire to kill or maim others.
Ripping someones face off also counts as "blood·lust" 😂
One more time so you MIGHT understand the term
blood·lust:
noun
1. uncontrollable desire to kill or maim others.
Originally posted by carver9
Lol...CIS off doesnt mean the character turns into killers.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I agree.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Black Adam wasn't a remorseless killer. He actually let MM go. I don't think Superman is pulling his punches but he isn't out to kill everyone either IMO.
Originally posted by Badabing
Round 2 - CIS is off and bloodlust is on for Superman. Think of Superman with the rage Black Adam has in WW III.
blood·lust:
noun
1. uncontrollable desire to kill or maim others.
Having regret or guilt will have little to nothing to do with being blood lusted
You got it?
Originally posted by Rao Kal ElMy comment about Black Adam was to prove in that storyline he wasn't trying to kill everyone in his path. Not at all. I listed an example thus backing my reasoning within that particular story.
Making the same comments as always, at some point you should read some comics and TRY to understand them.Let me help you out because apparently this words in English are to hard for you to understand
[b]blood·lust:
noun
1. uncontrollable desire to kill or maim others.Killing Men, Women and CHILDREN counts as "blood·lust" 😂
blood·lust:
noun
1. uncontrollable desire to kill or maim others.Ripping someones face off also counts as "blood·lust" 😂
One more time so you MIGHT understand the term
blood·lust:
noun
1. uncontrollable desire to kill or maim others.blood·lust:
noun
1. uncontrollable desire to kill or maim others.Having regret or guilt will have little to nothing to do with being blood lusted
You got it?
[/B]
Putting up definitions is nice and all but this is clearly a comic book defined term.
I rarely quote other posters because I form my own opinions. It's up for debate.
Originally posted by Galan007
Depends on how you define bloodlust, I suppose.Like I said earlier: I think of a bloodlusted character as one that removes their personal 'governor'(ie. self-imposed limitations/CIS) and does anything within their means to defeat an opponent.
My opinion doesn't have to be shared by all.
Originally posted by quanchi112
My comment about Black Adam was to prove in that storyline he wasn't trying to kill everyone in his path. Not at all. I listed an example thus backing my reasoning within that particular story.
Um... He did not killed MMH for a reson, because "he was not like the others"
Originally posted by quanchi112
Putting up definitions is nice and all but this is clearly a comic book defined term.
😂 no, It is written in the ENGLISH language, therefore the definitions applying to that language apply, Unless the writer invented that word, um.... but he didn't
Originally posted by quanchi112
I rarely quote other posters because I form my own opinions. It's up for debate.
What is up for debate? your "opinion" of blood lusted or what Bada meant by saying that Superman is blood lusted?
If you need help on this idea, let me help you, He says :
Originally posted by Badabing
Round 2 - CIS is off and bloodlust is on for Superman. Think of Superman with the rage Black Adam has in WW III.
The idea is pretty simple, Superman is even willing to kill children and will spare someone because "he is different" it can't get clearer than that. If you need help to understand the concept let me know, I am willing to help you.
Originally posted by quanchi112
My opinion doesn't have to be shared by all.
Yeah! I know. And 90% of the time is not.
In any case the definition applies to the idea used in the sentence, not to what ever definition I want to create out of thin air.
"Blood lust" is not a term only applied in KMC is a word that exist in the dictionary and is not up for grabs to interpretation.
Is defined as lust for blood, if you need help with that, also let me know.
Originally posted by Rao Kal ElSo you admit he didn't try to kill everyone. Progress.
Um... He did not killed MMH for a reson, because "he was not like the others"😂 no, It is written in the ENGLISH language, therefore the definitions applying to that language apply, Unless the writer invented that word, um.... but he didn't
What is up for debate? your "opinion" of blood lusted or what Bada meant by saying that Superman is blood lusted?
If you need help on this idea, let me help you, He says :
The idea is pretty simple, Superman is even willing to kill children and will spare someone because "he is different" it can't get clearer than that. If you need help to understand the concept let me know, I am willing to help you.
Yeah! I know. And 90% of the time is not.
In any case the definition applies to the idea used in the sentence, not to what ever definition I want to create out of thin air.
"Blood lust" is not a term only applied in KMC is a word that exist in the dictionary and is not up for grabs to interpretation.
Is defined as lust for blood, if you need help with that, also let me know.
Here is the actual thread topic with kmcers sharing their opinion on how bloodlusted applies to comic book characters. If this wasn't up for a debate then the thread would be useless to create.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t583680.html
🙂
Yes, I get that he isn't pulling his punches but that's what I basically said from the beginning. Black Adam wasn't pulling his punches either nor did I say he did. He didn't try to kill everyone who crossed his path. Undeniable.
Again, my opinion is different is all.
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/121837/2860367-black_adam.jpg
"Every blow he lands is meant to kill."
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you admit he didn't try to kill everyone. Progress.
No, He did not, However He killed Men, Women and children and somehow because he found MMH "to be different" he did not killed him too
Originally posted by quanchi112
Here is the actual thread topic with kmcers sharing their opinion on how bloodlusted applies to comic book characters. If this wasn't up for a debate then the thread would be useless to create.
I don't know if you noticed, but most agree that "blood lust" means that "lust for blood" anything necessary in order to get blood
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, I get that he isn't pulling his punches but that's what I basically said from the beginning. Black Adam wasn't pulling his punches either nor did I say he did. He didn't try to kill everyone who crossed his path. Undeniable.Again, my opinion is different is all.
WAIT just because BA did not killed MMH because "he was different" you are trying to imply that Superman will not kill one of this characters, because for some reason he will find one of them to "be different"? Get out of here, He probably will not kill all of them, but he is blood lusted meaning that he is out for blood.
Being blood lusted does not means he has to kill them, if you read the definition, it means Superman has a lust for blood like Black Adam did in that comic and BADA is being nice enough to let you know what definition or idea he is using for "blood lust"
So basically Quan, think of Superman willing to kill or maim men, women and children. Do you get it now?
READ CAREFULLY
Originally posted by Rao Kal El
On the second scenario Superman will give little to no regard on the other characters well being, So he does not care if he kills them, maim them, cripple them, lobotomize them, burn them or drill holes at super speed on their chest.He clears the second round.
Originally posted by abhilegend
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/121837/2860367-black_adam.jpg"Every blow he lands is meant to kill."
You are going to make him to suck his tumb and curl under his bed
Originally posted by quanchi112
I disagree due to Prof. hulk engaging him at the same time. The Hulks overwhelm and ko him.
Ridiculous.
In your opinion what is the best example of an unrestrained Superman?
The ones I can easily reference KO's Grey Hulk with ease and then beats Prof. Hulk with slightly more effort.
If they land 3 shots between the 2 they would be lucky.
Originally posted by Rao Kal ElSo my point was he didn't kill everyone he faded without restraint in the story. Again undeniable.
No, He did not, However He killed Men, Women and children and somehow because he found MMH "to be different" he did not killed him tooI don't know if you noticed, but most agree that "blood lust" means that "lust for blood" anything necessary in order to get blood
WAIT just because BA did not killed MMH because "he was different" you are trying to imply that Superman will not kill one of this characters, because for some reason he will find one of them to "be different"? Get out of here, He probably will not kill all of them, but he is blood lusted meaning that he is out for blood.
Being blood lusted does not means he has to kill them, if you read the definition, it means Superman has a lust for blood like Black Adam did in that comic and BADA is being nice enough to let you know what definition or idea he is using for "blood lust"
So basically Quan, think of Superman willing to kill or maim men, women and children. Do you get it now?
READ CAREFULLY
Again, it was a thread posted with the point being to see how comic book fans define the term. You believe other peoples opinions don't matter. That's wrong. I disagree with your definition. Point blank.
No, I said Superman will be all out while trying to defeat anyone in his path without focusing on death only which you maintained.
My stance hasn't changed.
Originally posted by Rao Kal ElDoesn't change the fact he spared Mm. This statement only applies to that scene and afterwards. Superman not pulling his punches is the same thing Adam did at this point. My stance has still not changed.
You are going to make him to suck his tumb and curl under his bed
Originally posted by LordofBrooklynSpeculation and ultimately I disagree since an all out Superman with a sun amp failed to defeat WW one on one let alone two Hulks with this healing factor.
Ridiculous.In your opinion what is the best example of an unrestrained Superman?
The ones I can easily reference KO's Grey Hulk with ease and then beats Prof. Hulk with slightly more effort.
If they land 3 shots between the 2 they would be lucky.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't use it as an example of his fighting tactics but as an example of his all out power.Isn't that fair enough ?
It wasn't all out power, so it still isn't valid.
Above his average? Sure, but still not his maximum. His damaged mindset comes in to it, which makes it invalid.
Being mentally controlled in general invalidates most feats as per numerous mod rulings.
Originally posted by -Pr-Ok, so conversely it can't be used for his positive side as well due to the speed of the fight and the manner in which he broke her wrist.
It wasn't all out power, so it still isn't valid.Above his average? Sure, but still not his maximum. His damaged mindset comes in to it, which makes it invalid.
Being mentally controlled in general invalidates most feats as per numerous mod rulings.
