Originally posted by Dr McBeefingtonUnfortunately, I never said that either. I think we just got our wires crossed.
I never said it wasn't a factor, at ALL. I don't know why you guys keep reading so much into it. But to say that Anakin, Dooku, Maul, etc were prodigies but the most powerful Jedi Master before Luke/having the 2nd highest midichlorian count [b]ISN'T is a little ridiculous don't you think? [/B]
Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
I've never even remotely implied Yoda's age had nothing to do with his skill. I dont expect TJ to know how to read but subjekt and RH come on. It was also a response to Marvel who said he had skill ONLY because of his skill. And don't pay any attention to Tj, he is just mad he got his ass kicked.
thats... not what I said.
Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
and all im saying is that experience stacks with time thus it makes sense that someones skills would only improve with time unless they sit on their arse and not work on those skills at all.
😐
Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
thats... not what I said.😐
Actually, what you said was this:
hows that dumb? anakin is the most inherently skilled duelist of the mythos. yoda is only where he is because he had 900 years to hone his abilities. if anakin or luke had half that time they would be literally gods without any peer or competition what so ever. id say the same for mace and kas'im.
::😖igh::: Once again. Here is the last thing you said
and all im saying is that experience stacks with time thus it makes sense that someones skills would only improve with time unless they sit on their arse and not work on those skills at all.
yoda is only where he is because he had 900 years to hone his abilities.