Yoda, Mace Windu, & Obi-Wan vs Darth Sidious, Count Dooku, & Darth Maul

Started by Eminence8 pages
Eminence Boss

I'm sorry you and Sir Cat don't have any friends to high five...

Dr McBeefington Restricted

I said.. HIGH FIVE.

Dr McBeefington Restricted

I must say. Beating Faunus and RH both in the same day? I DEFINITELY need to keep slinging that rock.

Red Nemesis The Blind Critic

Sorry. It got buried.


ROFL So your only response is that I allegedly agreed with the majority, despite the fact that I made this argument for almost 3 years now? Can you be any more full of shit?? Wow.. You'd fail a lie detector test within minutes.

This is dumb. You made the argument that "Revan is powerful."

This is explicitly the only thing you wanted to argue. That is simple board consensus. The only part that was better than TJ's argument was that you agreed with consensus while he was claiming Revan had nothing. He overstepped. You didn't step at all.

You have not made a "new" case or even a strong one, for the simple fact that you have not made an argument at all. You've simply repeated the general feeling on the topic.


Your response indicated you did INDEED read the whole argument, and agreed that I don't have to list what Revan learned because it wasn't related to a combat scenario. Days later you claim that I didn't respond to Wolverine because I was....Losing? You've definitely entered the "I'm full of shit" category pretty fast.

Now you're being belligerent, which I'm pretty sure is a sign of desperation. I read the argument because TJ was posting. He's not a tool or a jerk. You however... 😬


Edit: And if you don't read my posts as you claim, how can you make the assertion that I either never win an argument, or don't know how to make a valid one?

Arguments with or around me.

You might be good at pwning n00bs like Allankles or Kotor3, but you've got nothing on somebody competent. TJ was simply out to troll you by the end- the downward spiral of "get the last word" proves that much at least.


Full of Shit x2... Please try again.

Also: Your response to Allankles was identical to my librarian analogy. Thanks #1 fan.


Nice. You've stumbled upon something valid. I guess I'll get der Fuhrer to add a footnote allowing for luck?

Dr McBeefington Restricted

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
This is dumb. You made the argument that "Revan is powerful."

This is explicitly the only thing you wanted to argue. That is simple board consensus. The only part that was better than TJ's argument was that you agreed with consensus while he was claiming Revan had nothing. He overstepped. You didn't step at all.


Right.. And which TJ disagreed with. I argued it, you agreed, the end.

You have not made a "new" case or even a strong one, for the simple fact that you have not made an argument at all. You've simply repeated the general feeling on the topic.

Or rather, my general feeling and your acknowledgement..

Now you're being belligerent, which I'm pretty sure is a sign of desperation. I read the argument because TJ was posting. He's not a tool or a jerk. You however... 😬

I'm not being belligerent..I'm exposing your contradictions...Successfully.

You might be good at pwning n00bs like Allankles or Kotor3, but you've got nothing on somebody competent. TJ was simply out to troll you by the end- the downward spiral of "get the last word" proves that much at least.

I pwned you with your contradictions. When you have you done that to me? Unless you're counting the time where I didn't want to do the legwork? And it doesn't matter what TJ was out to do at the end because I wasn't quoting the end🙂

Nice. You've stumbled upon something valid. I guess I'll get der Fuhrer to add a footnote allowing for luck? [/B]

I'm going to assume that you're not going to respond to contradiction #2. If you claim that I can't debate for shit or make a valid argument, and then claim that you don't read my arguments, you end up looking like a fool. But I'm glad you amended that assertion with "With or around me". Clever🙂

So there goes your assertion that I can't own anyone that can debate, or that I can even create a valid argument. It's been fun RH.

Dr McBeefington Restricted

I'll concede that I'm a huge jackass if you concede that you contradicted yourself in a desperate attempt to make me look foolish and that I legitimately called you out and made you me Advent.

Red Nemesis The Blind Critic

The problem is that you think you've accomplished anything. You haven't.

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
Right.. And which TJ disagreed with. I argued it, you agreed, the end.

What TJ disagreed with was your exaggeration of Revan's accomplishments. Which is a valid criticism. You fellate him as much as Nebaris does Bane, only you're much, much worse at it.

TJ's mistake was getting angry before he meant to.

You didn't actually do anything. Nothing you argued needed to be proven. In fact, nothing you argued could be proven. You wereare incapable of quantifying Revan and everybody knows it.

What I agreed with was that Revan had power. Every single poster evar agrees with this.

Everything TJ said was right except for this:
that his frustration made one overreaching claim.

Everything else was golden. I think I note this:

TJ's contention is counted as a point of common sense.

Everything he said was true.


Or rather, my general feeling and your acknowledgement..

So you're going to take credit for the default assumption of every poster on KMC? Well then I am the one that convinced them to communicate in English. And that N.'s drain could effect an entire planet.


I'm not being belligerent..I'm exposing your contradictions...Successfully.

Contradictions? The most you've got is "DS is not getting angry" and "DS is arguing consensus against another consensus."

That isn't a contradiction of "DS is bad at this."

I pwned you with your contradictions. When you have you done that to me? Unless you're counting the time where I didn't want to do the legwork? And it doesn't matter what TJ was out to do at the end because I wasn't quoting the end🙂


And by 'didn't want to' you mean 'couldn't' and by 'legwork' you mean 'honest reflection' then yes. I do mean the time that you chickened out of responding.


I'm going to assume that you're not going to respond to contradiction #2. If you claim that I can't debate for shit or make a valid argument, and then claim that you don't read my arguments, you end up looking like a fool. But I'm glad you amended that assertion with "With or around me". Clever🙂

So there goes your assertion that I can't own anyone that can debate, or that I can even create a valid argument. It's been fun RH. [/B]


You know what? Fine.

I admit that I have not read every single one of your arguments. The fact remains that you have yet to make a good one that I've read. This is very similar to the idea that I have dropped a ball one hundred times and it has always fallen in accordance to the theory of gravity.

This does not preclude the ball from hovering in place in the same way that you are theoretically capable of constructing a valid argument by some stroke of luck. A bajillion monkeys banging away at keyboards would eventually write out shakespeare...

I cannot reasonably say that you will never make a valid argument, but I can certainly say that I've never read one and any evaluation of your mental facilities suggest that you never will.

Dr McBeefington Restricted

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
The problem is that you think you've accomplished anything. You haven't.

This is irrelevant because TJ was arguing AGAINST what you would call the majority. Secondly, the point was that you agreed with me then contradicted yourself. Stop trying to turn it around.

What TJ disagreed with was your exaggeration of Revan's accomplishments. Which is a valid criticism. You fellate him as much as Nebaris does Bane, only you're much, much worse at it.

WHAT exaggeration? You agreed with everything I said? And I fellate Revan? This is where I tell you to prove more nonsense, and you try to redirect the point.

You didn't actually do anything. Nothing you argued needed to be proven. In fact, nothing you argued could be proven. You wereare incapable of quantifying Revan and everybody knows it.

Ah right. Last sign of desperation being "everybody knows it". And for the final time, it needed to be proven because TJ didn't agree with it. IF you were an objective human being you'd focus on the truth rather than trying desperately to make me look bad from ANY angle.

What I agreed with was that Revan had power. Every single poster evar agrees with this.

TJ did NOT agree on the basis that he wanted his power to be quantified. Why can you not understand this point?

So you're going to take credit for the default assumption of every poster on KMC? Well then I am the one that convinced them to communicate in English. And that N.'s drain could effect an entire planet.

More misdirection and nonsense. I didn't take credit for anything. YOU stated that all I did was COPY the majority, rather than forming my own opinion. You are now claiming that i'm taking credit for the allegedly default assumption. This is unbecoming of you.

Contradictions? The most you've got is "DS is not getting angry" and "DS is arguing consensus against another consensus."

That isn't a contradiction of "DS is bad at this."


Have you not been reading...YOU agreed with me on the points I was making KNOWING I wasn't arguing combat related scenarios. Days later you claimed I was dodging Wolverine's points because I was losing, FORGETTING what you posted. NOW you're claiming that I exaggerated, verbally fellated Revan, and virtually anything else to take your mind off of your retardation..

Finally, you claim that I can't make valid arguments, and then claim you never read my arguments. You amending this position does nothing except concede the point through backpeddling.

And by 'didn't want to' you mean 'couldn't' and by 'legwork' you mean 'honest reflection' then yes. I do mean the time that you chickened out of responding.

No no, I just didn't want to do the leg work. Look at you telling me I can't make an argument while you're getting more pathetic by the posts. hilarious.

I admit that I have not read every single one of your arguments. The fact remains that you have yet to make a good one that I've read. This is very similar to the idea that I have dropped a ball one hundred times and it has always fallen in accordance to the theory of gravity.

You claimed that you don't read ANY of my arguments. The argument with TJ was a victory because of what we were discussing. The economic argument with LS was a curbstomp. Just because you refuse to acknowledge my accolades doesn't mean that I don't have any.

I cannot reasonably say that you will never make a valid argument, but I can certainly say that I've never read one and any evaluation of your mental facilities suggest that you never will. [/B]

Unfortunately THIS argument proves otherwise, as you are consistently on the losing end..Again...Your interpretation or opinion of me becomes irrelevant when it comes to reality.