Originally posted by Dr McBeefington[Rant]The reason why people never technically 'defeat' you in an argument is because you never argue the same points they do as you know you'll lose. Instead you argue enterely new points and when you start losing that argument, you change again. The reason why your 'never defeated' is because no argument with you is ever finished as you avoid it. No I may not have 'defeated' you, but then I never debate, i'm a spectator, I can see this happen. Hell, even half the people in here can see it happening, incuding people who have actually technically defeated you.
Yea except the people that claim I do this have never defeated me in an argument, instead electing to play "I know you are but what am I", and lying to themselves🙂
[/Rant]
Originally posted by mattatom
[Rant]The reason why people never technically 'defeat' you in an argument is because you never argue the same points they do as you know you'll lose. Instead you argue enterely new points and when you start losing that argument, you change again. The reason why your 'never defeated' is because no argument with you is ever finished as you avoid it. No I may not have 'defeated' you, but then I never debate, i'm a spectator, I can see this happen. Hell, even half the people in here can see it happening, incuding people who have actually [b]technically defeated you.[/Rant] [/B]
prove up or shut up.
And I never said people don't defeat me, I just said those that claim I ignore them because of their points, are the ones that can't defeat me in a debate. But of course you're going to prove it....Right?
Originally posted by mattatom
Your just in denial. The reason they don't defeat you is because you always change the damn topic of the argument. I don't need to prove it since it's painfully obvious to see even someone like me who hasn't been here for long.
Right. I rest my case. Btw, you're accusing me of switching topics or ignoring points that would defeat me when...You...Did...Just...That..
In the words of Gideon.... Pot.Kettle.Black.
Thanks for making a fool out of yourself. But please continue with your "I don't need to prove it because everyone sees!!!" argument.
I'm sorry. I can't let this happen.
Matt
Instead you argue enterely new points and when you start losing that argument, you change again.
Matt
The reason they don't defeat you is because you always change the damn topic of the argument.
DS
You're accusing me of switching topics or ignoring points that would defeat me when...You...Did...Just...That..
Oh he clearly switched topics.
And this?
I just said those that claim I ignore them because of their points, are the ones that can't defeat me in a debate.
Stop it.
I beat you. You refused to respond.
Advent beat you. You gave a big 'NUH UH' and didn't respond.
Faunus rapes you routinely. I guess you're used to it and barely notice it anymore.
Gideon owns your soul.
You make it a point not to respond when you're losing, or when you haven't got better debaters to come rescue you. Your arrogance here is totally baseless.
Mattatom👆 👆
[Rant]The reason why people never technically 'defeat' you in an argument is because you never argue the same points they do as you know you'll lose. Instead you argue enterely new points and when you start losing that argument, you change again. The reason why your 'never defeated' is because no argument with you is ever finished as you avoid it. No I may not have 'defeated' you, but then I never debate, i'm a spectator, I can see this happen. Hell, even half the people in here can see it happening, incuding people who have actually technically defeated you.[/Rant]
Red Nemesis👆 👆
This is laughable. And false. And delusional and self-aggrandizing.Stop it.
I beat you. You refused to respond.
Advent beat you. You gave a big 'NUH UH' and didn't respond.
Faunus rapes you routinely. I guess you're used to it and barely notice it anymore.
Gideon owns your soul.
You make it a point not to respond when you're losing, or when you haven't got better debaters to come rescue you. Your arrogance here is totally baseless.
Also, QFP.
MattatomIt's a defense mechanism!
Your just in denial.
*ba-dum, pssshhh*
Also, this is hilarious.
Spoiler:You people make congestion and headaches go away better than, like, morphine. ✅
pun wut?
Actually Advent sent me a nice PM🙂
Sorry RH, I didn't refuse to respond. I know you're not big on memory or reading comprehension, but I conceded because I didn't want to do the research. That's not a refusal to respond.
Faunus? The last time and only time he beat me was the Maul Obiwan argument, before he went on his "tdtd" tirade and got shot down badly, where now he's just irrelevant on this forum.
So once again RH, your memory is quite hazy(no surprise).
Oh wait, I'm still waiting for you to show me where I didn't respond when I was losing? Go ahead. This should be hilarious.
And while we are at it, show me where people have to come rescue me. You mean when others agree with me? OH NOES! In that case, when someone supports you, they're rescuing you! Rofl
Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
Oh last but not least. I thought this would be so obvious for RH that I forgot to add it.Scenario: mattadom tells me I engage in something. I tell him to prove it. He tells me he doesn't have to because everybody knows.
Your response was that...I am dodging the accusation?
[b]W.O.W
[/B]
Crisis averted.
Go ahead DS. Find where I said you were dodging the accusation. I dare you. It sure would be nice to see a valid argument from you.
But we wont. There are two reasons for this:
1. That you are simply incapable of constructing or validating a valid argument.
2. That I have not accused you of dodging Matt's criticism.
Oh wait, I'm still waiting for you to show me where I didn't respond when I was losing? Go ahead. This should be hilarious.
Wolverine
Yeah, you still haven't told me the quote that stated revan plundered everything on malachor let alone actually tell me what revan learned.
*crickets*
Advent
I've provided mountains of proof, refusing to accept it doesn't make it any less valid.
*crickets*
NO U"
Also:
[some stuff I said here
DS
NO U
DS
And while we are at it, show me where people have to come rescue me.
The entire thread was one failure after another for you.
There isn't a good example here on KMC because no one likes you enough to do it. Gideon routinely beats you (see above) and doesn't care enough about any of these fights to pull you out of the holes you dig yourself. Face it- you're a joke. At least Nebaris can make a coherent argument. In fact, the only person I've seen try to help you on KMC is Nebaris himself:
The Awesomeness
Don't worry Sexy, I've got your back.*sends Gideon that private message*
DS
Faunus? The last time and only time he beat me was the Maul Obiwan argument, before he went on his "tdtd" tirade and got shot down badly, where now he's just irrelevant on this forum.
Eminence
[quote]
[quote]
[quote]Wolverine
What has Anededdu done that puts him above Vader...
DS[/quote]
The fact that his skills have atrophied, yet he was still powerful as hell with his illusions, should count.
DS
Let me think of the sith that are more powerful than Vader including unknowns, who even with what we know, is enough to conclude their superiority over Vader..Sidious
Bane
Kun
Revan
Andeddu
Muur
Ragnos
Nadd
Caedus
Sith Emperor
Traya
Wyyrlok(possible).That's all on the top of my head that wouldn't put Vader in the top 10.
Ergo:
[quote]Wolverine
DS made a claim that andeddu > TFU vader
👆[/quote][/quote]
Sorry RH, I didn't refuse to respond. I know you're not big on memory or reading comprehension, but I conceded because I didn't want to do the research. That's not a refusal to respond.
[quote]DS
[PrE]
Yea now that everything is over I have until Monday to come up with an answer, because after that, Wimbledon starts🙂
DS
[BB#2]
I'm doing research now.
DS
[BB#2]
Exellent. That means I have a month.
RH, you'll have your response by the time you're back.[/quote]
DS
Nothing I can find supports my worldview so I'm not going to respond because Nemesis will pwn me moar.
Rrrrrape.
I have to admit; DS has me with the "relevance" issue. I am a capable debater, of which this forum has several. He, on the other hand, is quite indisputably the forum's biggest joke. It's bad enough that so few people like or are willing to interact with him that he has to turn to openly conversing with Nebaris against the repeated demands of a moderator to reassure himself of his "confidence in kicking ass," but to be mocked by over a dozen different people in four days regarding his incompetency?
I can't touch that.
Originally posted by EminenceChuck Norris could.
Rrrrrape.I have to admit; DS has me with the "relevance" issue. I am a capable debater, of which this forum has several. He, on the other hand, is quite indisputably the forum's biggest joke. It's bad enough that so few people like or are willing to interact with him that he has to turn to openly conversing with Nebaris against the repeated demands of a moderator to reassure himself of his "confidence in kicking ass," but to be mocked by over a dozen different people in four days regarding his incompetency?
I can't touch that.
Originally posted by Red Nemesis
Scenario: DS gets called on some BS. Thinking quickly, he invents a silly position for his opponent to take and argues against it. The criticism is safely hidden in pages of (pitiful) attempts at insults from DS and valid confusion on the part of the mark.But we wont. There are two reasons for this:
1. That you are simply incapable of constructing or validating a valid argument.
2. That I have not accused you of dodging Matt's criticism.
You make it a point not to respond when you're losing, or when you haven't got better debaters to come rescue you. Your arrogance here is totally baseless.
DS:
"..."*crickets*
DS:
"...*crickets*
NO U"
Also:
http://s1.zetaboards.com/Project_Eden/topic/1560496/5/
The first two posts.
You had been doing a "piss poor job" of making an argument. Gideon comes in and makes an argument that supports you and you instantly fall into line as his lapdog. You become absolutely mute on the topic, instead sniping at MC about Hitler. I then proceed to demolish that position too. Gideon doesn't save you on that one so Valerian does it.The entire thread was one failure after another for you.
There isn't a good example here on KMC because no one likes you enough to do it. Gideon routinely beats you (see above) and doesn't care enough about any of these fights to pull you out of the holes you dig yourself. Face it- you're a joke. At least Nebaris can make a coherent argument. In fact, the only person I've seen try to help you on KMC is Nebaris himself:
[/color]
[/quote]
RH, you'll have your response by the time you're back.
Originally posted by Eminence
Rrrrrape.I have to admit; DS has me with the "relevance" issue. I am a capable debater, of which this forum has several. He, on the other hand, is quite indisputably the forum's biggest joke. It's bad enough that so few people like or are willing to interact with him that he has to turn to openly conversing with Nebaris against the repeated demands of a moderator to reassure himself of his "confidence in kicking ass," but to be mocked by over a dozen different people in four days regarding his incompetency?
I can't touch that.
Yes, the forum's biggest joke. This coming from someone who's tried to call me out as being tdtd, failed miserably, then went to Janus' forum and did the same thing? Over a dozen people? Really? Somebody doesn't know how to count.
I must say Faunus, you've lost your touch. Instead of sounding confident you go right for the "LOLZ NOBODY LIKES YOU ON THE FORUM" issue, and exaggerating it. I can count on one hand how many people responded to you "tdtd" crusade. Is it any wonder you don't do much on this forum anymore?
Maybe you can amuse the rest of this forum once again with a 3rd TDTD crusade? It would definitely make you more useful.
Come on guys, the best you could come up with is an exaggeration of "nobody likes you"? Sad indeed.