True but he wasn't shriviled up either.
So if a Normal Phoenix (whos weaker then Dark Phoenix or WCP) can bring him to his knees. Whos to say that Dark Phoenix can't take on a fully fed version.
When has Galactus ever even been fully fed? As it's explained in the comics, the moment he finishes feeding, he's hungry again.
About fully fed Galactus. When Galactus isn't hungry, means he is fed and has full power at his disposal for a short time. When you eat, you aren't hungry and you have energy for one full training. And the best is when you have energy from light food, so that a stomach isn't heavy. Your body is fed and you have maximum energy for a fight, training,...
When you eat too much, your energy is actually lower, because of body using it so much to digest it and you have to go to sleep. So much about that. But when you eat well, means you are not hungry and have full energy to train and so on... but then again you become hungry and weaker.
When Galactus eats well, one planet, I think he has full power and energy at his disposal for a battle. I never saw him complaining when he ate.
He had full power against FP Tyrant. He wasn't starving when Phoenix brought him down. Enough this nonsense about him fully fed and full power. When he is hungry, he is weak, but that goes for every living being who depends on nutrition. You make Galactus so much special about that while he isn't different and is the same as human in that department. Because in difference of energy between him and human, his meal is much bigger than that of a human, hence his meal being a planet.
Normal Galactus is Galactus who feels well and isn't hungry at all. That should mean he has full power at his disposal, energy to pack a full punch. When he drains it, he must eat again. But like I said, that also goes for humans, animals and so on...
In my opinion normal Galactus is Galactus who isn't hungry and is fed and has full energy on his disposal.
Originally posted by Xplosive
About fully fed Galactus. When Galactus isn't hungry, means he is fed and has full power at his disposal for a short time. When you eat, you aren't hungry and you have energy for one full training. And the best is when you have energy from light food, so that a stomach isn't heavy. Your body is fed and you have maximum energy for a fight, training,...
When you eat too much, your energy is actually lower, because of body using it so much to digest it and you have to go to sleep. So much about that. But when you eat well, means you are not hungry and have full energy to train and so on... but then again you become hungry and weaker.
When Galactus eats well, one planet, I think he has full power and energy at his disposal for a battle. I never saw him complaining when he ate.
He had full power against FP Tyrant. He wasn't starving when Phoenix brought him down. Enough this nonsense about him fully fed and full power. When he is hungry, he is weak, but that goes for every living being who depends on nutrition. You make Galactus so much special about that while he isn't different and is the same as human in that department. Because in difference of energy between him and human, his meal is much bigger than that of a human, hence his meal being a planet.
Normal Galactus is Galactus who feels well and isn't hungry at all. That should mean he has full power at his disposal, energy to pack a full punch. When he drains it, he must eat again. But like I said, that also goes for humans, animals and so on...In my opinion normal Galactus is Galactus who isn't hungry and is fed and has full energy on his disposal.
It is common knowledge that Galactus is equal to a fully powered abstract when fully powered. We just don't know how much he needs to be fully powered.
Originally posted by h1a8
Galactus could probably eat 10 planets at a single sitting before being fully powered. Who's says one planet makes him fully powered? Non starving doesn't equal fully powered no matter how you slice it.It is common knowledge that Galactus is equal to a fully powered abstract when fully powered. We just don't know how much he needs to be fully powered.
No, when he eats a planet, he is fed. Nothing wrong with him. He feels well. And if he feels well, he can produce full energy, it's just that he drains quickly and must eat again. Nothing weird here.
Until I see something different from him, normal Galactus is a fed Galactus who has full energy until he drains it. To keep this full energy, he should constantly drain something during the battle.
Originally posted by Bouboumaster
Doctor Doom, after stealing the Power Cosmic from Galactus, ate Taa II and went against the Beyonder, and while he got pwned, he survived it. Do the math.
So? Am, that means or you want to say that he had a better showing against Beyonder than LT and pretty much whole MU together. So that means Galactus power>whole MU universe.
When someone survived against Beyonder, it was only because Beyonder wanted it that way. Galactus against Beyonder is like an ant against Beyonder. Literally no difference for Beyonder.
If Galactus would do good against Scarlet Witch, it would be only because Wanda would allow it.
Even for Scarlet Witch there is no difference between an ant and Galactus, literally, let alone Beyonder.
Originally posted by Xplosive
About fully fed Galactus. When Galactus isn't hungry, means he is fed and has full power at his disposal for a short time. When you eat, you aren't hungry and you have energy for one full training. And the best is when you have energy from light food, so that a stomach isn't heavy. Your body is fed and you have maximum energy for a fight, training,...
When you eat too much, your energy is actually lower, because of body using it so much to digest it and you have to go to sleep. So much about that. But when you eat well, means you are not hungry and have full energy to train and so on... but then again you become hungry and weaker.
When Galactus eats well, one planet, I think he has full power and energy at his disposal for a battle. I never saw him complaining when he ate.
He had full power against FP Tyrant. He wasn't starving when Phoenix brought him down. Enough this nonsense about him fully fed and full power. When he is hungry, he is weak, but that goes for every living being who depends on nutrition. You make Galactus so much special about that while he isn't different and is the same as human in that department. Because in difference of energy between him and human, his meal is much bigger than that of a human, hence his meal being a planet.
Normal Galactus is Galactus who feels well and isn't hungry at all. That should mean he has full power at his disposal, energy to pack a full punch. When he drains it, he must eat again. But like I said, that also goes for humans, animals and so on...In my opinion normal Galactus is Galactus who isn't hungry and is fed and has full energy on his disposal.
While that line of thinking works fine with a human it's completely nonsense when looking at the history concerning Galactus. Galactus is as a being, depending on Energy in order to survive and Galactus never takes more then is required for his survival hence we will always see him as sated when having eat a planet, I'm also sated when I have eaten my evening meal that doesn't however mean that I can't eat anymore, the real difference is that where the food will hamper me, in Galactus case it'll just increase the power at his disposal (more on that later). In Galactus "battle" with Hyperstorm we learned that Galactus has a hunger that can never truly be sated that alone makes him very different from the human that you are trying to connect his hunger to. A Human can be sated with sufficient Food (as mentioned above and by yourself), if your line of thinking was in any way correct Galactus wouldn't have eaten Taa II (the Greatest scientific energy source in the universe, unless of cause you think that Taa II contains as much energy as Warworld did) when he was going to battle the Beyonder (please keep in mind that he was going to eat Warworld and the Sun Afterwards because he was going to need according to Reed all the energy he could get) he would have eaten Warworld instead of destoying his own "world" if you hypothesis was to hold any weight at all. Secondly it has NEVER been stated ANYWHERE that Galactus when he battled Fully Powered Tyrant was at Full Power, if you have scans that cements that Statement I for one would very much like to see them and I will immidiately concer if you haven't I'll take it as your own personal unsupported opinion. Thirdly when Galactus was going to engage Depowered Tyrant in combat, his comment (when feasting) to Morg was that Morg had made a excellent choice (Morg himself commented that he had found a planet with alot of proteins), so to Galactus the energy level in the planet has a relevance to the level of power he archive when feasting upon it, a Human can eat a large potion of Spaghetti ore a Beef with potato's and be fed in both instances, however that doesn't apply to Galactus the planets (ore other consumable items like his worldship) plays a part in the overall powerlevel he archives. To say one planet devoured = Full powered Galactus is plain wrong.
Originally posted by Utrigita
In Galactus "battle" with Hyperstorm we learned that Galactus has a hunger that can never truly be sated that alone makes him very different from the human that you are trying to connect his hunger to.
That is why I said he would need to constantly drain energy during a battle. And he was feeding on Hyperstorm energy, but he still wasn't seen as something special. And still, there is no important difference between Galactus and human. Human hunger can also never be truly sated (only temporarily), whole life. He actually always need to eat, always, no difference actually. He constantly need energy from food. No difference. Actually, when Galactus eats, he can endure more than human.
Originally posted by Utrigita
Secondly it has NEVER been stated ANYWHERE that Galactus when he battled Fully Powered Tyrant was at Full Power, if you have scans that cements that Statement
Ok, then let's go that way. You do know that it wasn't stated for many beings not being at their full power. Then we can also say that Tyrant was never at full power, because in time he could grow more powerful than he was against Galactus. See.
Originally posted by Utrigita
To say one planet devoured = Full powered Galactus is plain wrong.
I said for a short time and still stick to that. I mean, Galactus has never been really impressive. That is why it's almost always thrown excuses by his fans that he was hungry or if he wasn't hungry, he didn't eat enough. Galactus isn't anything special and that is it. That is why he didn't have some impressive feats. During BA it was shown what he would be able to do, but that didn't happen.
And then someone might say; it wouldn't be good to have Galactus at full power, too dangerous or... We have seen far more dangerous and powerful beings than Galactus could ever be, so no excuses there. He just isn't what he is made out to be, never was, that is why he doesn't have some feats.
Hungry or not, when he fought Phoenix he talked to her as equal, actually we could see that he considers Phoenix as more dangerous as himself. And he also said that Phoenix is a danger to the whole Omniverse.
Galactus also too quickly wears down to be dangerous to other really powerful beings.
Originally posted by Xplosive
That is why I said he would need to constantly drain energy during a battle. And he was feeding on Hyperstorm energy, but he still wasn't seen as something special. And still, there is no important difference between Galactus and human. Human hunger can also never be truly sated (only temporarily), whole life. He actually always need to eat, always, no difference actually. He constantly need energy from food. No difference. Actually, when Galactus eats, he can endure more than human.
Which isn't correct, Galactus have showed to go through numerous battles without the need for having his energy resupplied if he his powerlevel previously was high enough, The whole Magus incident points this out rather well. The difference is that Human hunger can be sated, a human body is unable to continue eating for a infinite amount of time, Galactus can because his hunger is never sated fully, a Humans hunger can be sated. Hence the comparison between Galactus and a regular Human doesn't hold.
Originally posted by Xplosive
Ok, then let's go that way. You do know that it wasn't stated for many beings not being at their full power. Then we can also say that Tyrant was never at full power, because in time he could grow more powerful than he was against Galactus. See.
I don't at all see how that in any way helps you previous statement that Galactus was at full power in his initial confrontation against Tyrant. We are only refering to Tyrant as at full power at that time because he was at that point of time much stronger then in his depowered form, also while Galactus gave his creature the same weakness as himself, we have no real way of knowing what exactly the weakness meant to Tyrant's powerlevel during the confrontation between him and Galactus, maybe Tyrant needed like Galactus to replenish his energy, maybe he was drained only when using, perhaps he only had the hunger etc.
Originally posted by Xplosive
I said for a short time and still stick to that. I mean, Galactus has never been really impressive. That is why it's almost always thrown excuses by his fans that he was hungry or if he wasn't hungry, he didn't eat enough. Galactus isn't anything special and that is it. That is why he didn't have some impressive feats. During BA it was shown what he would be able to do, but that didn't happen.
You are entitled to your own opinion. Again it has never been shown on panel that Galactus, when eating a single planet, would reach the same level of energy as he would when devouring Taa II and even then he wasn't at full capacity. The "excuses" are mentioned in the relevant comics but ofcause I can see how that from a point of view can be looked at as being a fanboy. No breaking the power of five cosmic containment units isn't a impressive feat I agree.
Originally posted by Xplosive
And then someone might say; it wouldn't be good to have Galactus at full power, too dangerous or... We have seen far more dangerous and powerful beings than Galactus could ever be, so no excuses there. He just isn't what he is made out to be, never was, that is why he doesn't have some feats.
It's to dangerous against the opponents that he is being pitted against on the forums, ofcause a being like the Living Tribunal, Merlyn, MJJ, etc Galactus powerlevel wouldn't mean a thing since he would get defeated anyway, but posters already knows that against those beings Galactus, in any sharp ore form (unless he gets the ultimate plot device the UN), doesn't stand a chance, hence the reason why he isn't pitted against them on this forum.
Originally posted by Xplosive
Hungry or not, when he fought Phoenix he talked to her as equal, actually we could see that he considers Phoenix as more dangerous as himself. And he also said that Phoenix is a danger to the whole Omniverse.
In what instance? the one where he was Hungry (mentioned on panel for your information) ore the one where he, from my point of view, showed that he could and had the authority to erase the Phoenix from the Universe? and whether one chooses to see the Phoenix force itself as the threat on the same level and in the same way as the little green midget (can't recall his name) is up to one self I suppose.
Originally posted by Xplosive
Galactus also too quickly wears down to be dangerous to other really powerful beings.
Galactus doesn't need to be Dangerous to the previous mentioned beings above, in order to be dangerous to the rest of the Universe.
I also rather enjoyed how this post turned into a flame Galactus.