Originally posted by h1a8 I don't believe Thor can shatter worlds even with Mjolnir. With that said Thor can't even destroy 1/1000 of a mountain with his fists. And that is the truth.
Bullshit. Beta Ray Bill has one shotted planets. There is more evidence to Thor being able to shatter planets, than there is that Superman can.
That is utter bullshit. Mjolnir does not amp his strength in anyway. It’s role in his striking feats are purely mechanical. Even when I provided scans, you still refuse to believe Thor’s level of strength. It’s nothing but utter ignorance. This isn’t how powerful you think Thor should be, but how powerful he has shown to be with his strength.
Mountains > Planets/Worlds
Amirite?
And just for fun, Thor cleaves a mountain in two:
Originally posted by h1a8 No need to prove as it is common sense to anyone who has read Thor.
Despite the fact that his greatest feats of strength come from without Mjolnir, and even his striking force has been stated to be world wrecking, without Mjolnir, you still have this notion that he is astronomically weaker without Mjolnir currently? Cool.
Wonder Woman is astronomically stronger than Superman. I say she is, and so she must be. I like your logic.
Originally posted by h1a8 False. No comic has backed up the lie that Thor has planet shattering strength. He doesn't even have mountain shattering strength. And no it hasn't been shown. Thor is weak dude in comparison to Superman. Very weak.
So you’re clearly ignoring Thor’s feats to justify this conclusion am I correct?
Originally posted by h1a8 If exaggerated narration is evidence then yes. Otherwise, I would be hard pressed to ignore they actual unquestionable feat.
It would be exaggerated narration, if it only was stated once and didn’t much up to his other feats. That is not the case. It completely matches up, to his level of strength, and is even further backed up by the fact that his inferior, Beta Ray Bill, has one shotted a planet with this force of his blow hitting Stardust. So, no it’s not simple exaggerated narration.
Originally posted by h1a8 I don't believe he has. And if so I don't believe it. Just like I don't believe Sentry can stalemate Galactus.
So we agree, that:
Thor > Beta Ray Bill > Superman
Beta Ray Bill can destroy planets clearly, yet you don’t believe Superman has the strength, and Thor has been shown, to be Beta Ray Bill’s superior. Cool. It’s A, B, C but it makes more sense than some of the other shit being argued here.
Originally posted by h1a8 Also I believe BRB is a lot stronger than Thor anyway. He bested him without even having the power of Thor. Gaining the power of Thor makes him stronger.
You see, that’s the problem right there. What you personally believe means shit, if it doesn’t match up the comics.
Beta Ray Bill is not a lot stronger than Thor, not even close. Thor is his superior actually. I thought this was evident? He bested him with only circumstances as he turned into Donald Blake in the first fight, and in the second fight, Odin placed them in a special battle field where apparently even Gods can die, and in an environment where Beta Ray Bill would have the advantage. He intended for Thor to lose to teach him humility, which was stated in the end of the comic. Thor being stronger was even evident during the recent Secret Invasion arc, the same Super Skrull that was manhandling Beta Ray Bill with a single arm while taking on Asgard couldn’t even make Thor bleed, and Thor not only did not use the small portion of the Odin Force, according to Fraction, he was severely weakened as that how he intended the time line to be. Also, Beta Ray Bill got an ass beating during Blood and Thunder.
In the case of Beta Ray Bill, Simonson, did not have the hammer amp up his strength to any level above Thor.
Originally posted by h1a8 With that said, those magical hammers [b]can supply extra momentum to the strike due to them having to obey their master's commands. For example, we all know that Mjolnir comes to Thor upon his command. It flies through the air. So when Thor is striking, the hammer can supply extra momentum by moving in the direction with Thor's swing. Helping him sort of. [/b]
That’s cool, and a smart tactic. Too bad it was never stated Thor or Beta Ray Bill were using it to assist them.
Originally posted by h1a8 The problem is it isn't backed up. Meaning, there is no evidence that backs it up.
Just because you refuse to ignore the evidence, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
Originally posted by h1a8 I never used a unquantifiable feat.
Lol. Was it not, you who brought up the Superman: Beyond incident? Was it not you, that brought up the instance Superman/Wonder Woman held up Spectre? Do I have to quote you? I will.
It’s okay for you do it, but it’s not okay when I start bringing up the feats right?
Originally posted by h1a8 Read the 5th post down (my post). http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=503446&pagenumber=5
Nice post, but for all I know it could be gibberish. Throwing in the fact, that Kyle was somehow reducing the gravitional affects on Earth or whatever he was doing, would throw everything out of whack would it not? As well, moving the Earth requires self propelled motion and is not a feat of pure strength. The part that really, reduces it’s validility is this:
Originally posted by h1a8 The most I've seen Thor lift (while struggling) was a 500-1000 ton creature. So Superman being a billion times stronger than Thor is very generous indeed.