Bible Sued For Homophobia

Started by Symmetric Chaos13 pages
Originally posted by Jaeh.is.Awesome
you don't. he does.

She said that using the words in the same sentence was bad. So would that sentence (which uses both homosexuality and pedophilia) a bigoted post?

There is a problem with discussing the two concepts together as it starts put them together in the public mind. However that's a flaw in processing not a result of bigottry.

smart ass. 😂

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
She said that using the words in the same sentence was bad. So would that sentence (which uses both homosexuality and pedophilia) a bigoted post?

i never said that it involves bigotry. I don't even know who said that.

I don't even know what bigot means. (yes, I'm that lame. forgive the english-is-not-my-first-language excuse, i'm going to go look it up now.)

edit: oh, so that's what it means... again, i never said its a bigoted post. that was probably another person..

Originally posted by ~The Wickerman~
You do realize that's a sex video right?

No, not really, you did with your incredibly dumb comparison.

I'm not playing any games. He has stated that he finds homosexuality disgusting, and that he finds pedophilia disgusting. He has stated he finds them equally disgusting. Is this so beyond your comprehension?

I didn't masturbate to it.

another "No, you!" response.

Again, semantics games. Do you think he finds pedophilia disgusting, but not bad? If we're just talking about what he finds disgusting (not to be wrong), then why did you start crying when others posted their opinion on his "disgust" opinion? They're equally entitled to their views as he is; you're defending his right to an opinion, while chastizing them for theirs and being overly dramatic about it.

Originally posted by Robtard
If we're just talking about what he finds disgusting (not to be wrong), then why did you start crying when others posted their opinion on his "disgust" opinion? They're equally entitled to their views as he is.

because the responses that wickerman is "crying" about are responses that are knee jerk reactions that took scars post out of context. if you look at all those posts he quoted the majority have people saying scar is an idiot for comparing a pedophile to a homosexual, which is inaccurate because thats not what scar was doing.

Originally posted by Jaeh.is.Awesome
i never said that it involves bigotry. I don't even know who said that.

I don't even know what bigot means. (yes, I'm that lame. forgive the english-is-not-my-first-language excuse, i'm going to go look it up now.)

edit: oh, so that's what it means... again, i never said its a bigoted post. that was probably another person..

Sigh, language barrier.

I was giving an example to LilB not making a statement.

Originally posted by Robtard
I didn't masturbate to it.

another "No, you!" response.

Again, semantics games. Do you think he finds pedophilia disgusting, but not bad? If we're just talking about what he finds disgusting (not to be wrong), then why did you start crying when others posted their opinion on his "disgust" opinion? They're equally entitled to their views as he is; you're defending his right to an opinion, while chastizing them for theirs and being overly dramatic about it.

inimalist* already covered that.

*I did it right, this time.

And, if you want to be right, Robtard, that's okay. I don't care if you're right or wrong. You can be right this time.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Sigh, language barrier.

I was giving an example to LilB not making a statement.

😛

so... that post wasn't really directed at me, or... was it... 😕

Originally posted by Robtard
I didn't masturbate to it.

another "No, you!" response.

Again, semantics games. Do you think he finds pedophilia disgusting, but not bad? If we're just talking about what he finds disgusting (not to be wrong), then why did you start crying when others posted their opinion on his "disgust" opinion? They're equally entitled to their views as he is; you're defending his right to an opinion, while chastizing them for theirs and being overly dramatic about it.

Doesn't mean it wasn't a sex video. The point remains, my comparison was valid, yours wasn't, and then you tried to invalidate my comparison, which I reinforced.

....this coming from the man who said "You failed there"? How am I supposed to respond to that? I responded in as eloquent a manner as I could to your "You failed there" comment. Sorry if my response didn't measure up to "You fail there". 😬

Concerning the last part, Ms.Marvel answered perfectly.

Originally posted by ~The Wickerman~
Doesn't mean it wasn't a sex video. The point remains, my comparison was valid, yours wasn't, and then you tried to invalidate my comparison, which I reinforced.

....this coming from the man who said "You failed there"? How am I supposed to respond to that? I responded in as eloquent a manner as I could to your "You failed there" comment. Sorry if my response didn't measure up to "You fail there". 😬

Concerning the last part, Ms.Marvel answered perfectly.

You said "two girls one cup", that doesn't implicate the people masturbating to it. You're trying to now, after the fact.

You did fail there. Your response had no bearing.

You're still ignoring the clear implication of his original post. Do you find pedophilia to be disgusting, but see nothing wrong with it?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
😕

I do not find [b]pedophilia at all comparable to homosexuality in terms of personal disgust. [/B]

Poor.

If that sentence had been used in a conversation by itself, it would have been the subject to same scrutiny because those are mentioned together.

Originally posted by Robtard
You said "two girls one cup", that doesn't implicate the people masturbating to it. You're trying to now, after the fact.

How is that even logicla, bro? You do know it's pronz, right? That was made for people who like scat. 😐

Edit- I'll explain it when I get home. I don't want to get too explicit in my posts while at work.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
because the responses that wickerman is "crying" about are responses that are knee jerk reactions that took scars post out of context. if you look at all those posts he quoted the majority have people saying scar is an idiot for comparing a pedophile to a homosexual, which is inaccurate because thats not what scar was doing.

this.

Originally posted by Robtard

You're still ignoring the clear implication of his original post. Do you find pedophilia to be disgusting, but see nothing wrong with it?

>>>>

Originally posted by Jaeh.is.Awesome
I think he also stated that he found the act of homosexuality wrong, but has nothing against homosexuals as people.

he wasn't saying that homosexuals are as bad as pedos. he was saying that the act of pedophelia and homosexuality disgusts him in almost equal ways.

he cleared that up in another post.

Originally posted by dadudemon
How is that even logicla, bro? You do know it's pronz, right? That was made for people who like scat. 😐

His wording implicated the shit-easers, not the baters.

Originally posted by ~The Wickerman~
I'm not being obtuse in any way.

Are you being deliberately illiterate?

In the statement, "[Homosexuality is] almost as disgusting as pedophilia," homosexuality is the subject, disgusting is a modifier, and pedophilia is the object. In a comparison, the subject is examined in contrast to the object. For the statement to compare disgust for one state of being to disgust for another state of being as you purport, disgust must be used as a noun instead of adjective, e.g. "My disgust of homosexuality is almost equal to my disgust of pedophilia." How does it feel to be only functionally literate?

Originally posted by Robtard
You're still ignoring the clear implication of his original post. Do you find pedophilia to be disgusting, but see nothing wrong with it?

i dont think thats the implication.

if i said "i think the nazi's policies in world war 2 are as inhumane and disgusting as a pedophile" that doesnt mean that i think all nazis are as inhumane and evil as pedophiles...

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
i dont think thats the implication.

if i said "i think the nazi's policies in world war 2 are as inhumane and disgusting as a pedophile" that doesnt mean that i think all nazis are as inhumane and evil as pedophiles...

No, but you would find any Nazi who stood by those policies and enforced them to be, right?

Originally posted by Robtard
You said "two girls one cup", that doesn't implicate the people masturbating to it. You're trying to now, after the fact.

You did fail there. Your response had no bearing.

You're still ignoring the clear implication of his original post. Do you find pedophilia to be disgusting, but see nothing wrong with it?

I don't give a shit about the people masturbating to it. I was referring to the sexual act in the video. I honestly think that you have trouble processing information, so I'll rephrase my initial phrasing:

Originally posted by ~The Wickerman~
If he said he finds 2 girls 1 cup as disgusting as pedophilia, no one would've said one single word.

"If he said he finds the actions in a scat porn video as disgusting as pedophilia, no one would've said one single word."

There. I even bolded it for the reading challenged.

How about saying bestiality is nearly as disgusting as pedophilia?

Would it be worse or better if he said he was disgusted (if he is, at all) with ephebophilia as he is with homosexuality?

Originally posted by ~The Wickerman~
I don't give a shit about the people masturbating to it. I was referring to the sexual act in the video. I honestly think that you have trouble processing information, so I'll rephrase my initial phrasing:

"If he said he finds [b]the actions in a scat porn video as disgusting as pedophilia, no one would've said one single word."

There. I even bolded it for the reading challenged. [/B]

Now you're dancing[again]; it gets old.

Your anger, insults and fits empower me, yes. *that emote of Goku powering up here*

Repeat: You're still ignoring the clear implication of his original post. Do you find pedophilia to be disgusting, but see nothing wrong with it? <--- that's a question