Siege: Invasion of Asgard [ Disscssion Thread]

Originally posted by Battlehammer
I am here posting becuase I wish to discuss the siege. I have said all I need to say about the spoiler tag situation.

I stating that my earlier post was all that was needed on the discussion concerning spoiler tags, at least on my part despite your belief I wish to start some sort of argument on the matter. Hostile as always my friend?

You seem to annoy many people with your antics, and the fact it seems to frustrate you so, is reason enough it seems for those who dislike you or your ideology when it concerns spoiler tags to speak. Or simply it could be your overly aggressive attitude, which frankly would not surprise myself in the least.

1. You didn't discuss Siege. You simply told us that you didn't need to discuss further, you didn't need to reply with that and continue things. You did, though, because you post wherever I do.

2. Not at all, I have no personal issue with you. I just see no reason why you had to reply twice in a row, with one of them being: "I'm not replying anymore on this topic, nope. Not replying, at all. Here I am, just not replying.". Why did you need to post to tell us you were no longer gonna post? I didn't address you or ask you a question, I just said that I KNEW you'd find a reason to post about me and you did.

As for the last part, yes, I get it. You've told me your opinion of me so many times and I care as little now as I ever did. I really haven't got the slightest care what you think of me. However, if you wish to discuss me, PM me. Don't clog threads with it. Any reply you give me that doesn't specifically deal with the topic will be PMed back to you with my reply.

Same goes for anyone from this point on. NOW, YOU can choose to continue posting off topic and prove me 100% right in your obsession, OR you can ignore everything I've just said and continue this discussion regarding the Secret Avengers with me in the other thread. Your call.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
1. You didn't discuss Siege. You simply told us that you didn't need to discuss further, you didn't need to reply with that and continue things. You did, though, because you post wherever I do.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
2. Not at all, I have no personal issue with you. I just see no reason why you had to reply twice in a row, with one of them being: "I'm not replying anymore on this topic, nope. Not replying, at all. Here I am, just not replying.". Why did you need to post to tell us you were no longer gonna post? I didn't address you or ask you a question, I just said that I KNEW you'd find a reason to post about me and you did.

Yes becuase again the world revolves around you, you are the sun

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
As for the last part, yes, I get it. You've told me your opinion of me so many times and I care as little now as I ever did. I really haven't got the slightest care what you think of me. However, if you wish to discuss me, PM me. Don't clog threads with it. Any reply you give me that doesn't specifically deal with the topic will be PMed back to you with my reply.

Same goes for anyone from this point on.

-AC

Yea I said it. and dont bother stating it I know you just sent out a report, but I dont care, it was worth it.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Yes, becuase clearly the world revolves around you......... 🙄

You stated my user name.....and I responded in turn.

Yes becuase again the world revolves around you, you are the sun

That was not my opinion of you, that was an observation. My opinion of you is that I think your a five foot nothing virgin who a pussy living in his parent basement........and literally spend every waking moment on this site or whacking it to the sims.

Yea I said it. and dont bother stating it I know you just sent out a report, but I dont care, it was worth it.

Battle hammer, please just ignore him.

Im not siding with him, cos his argument is based on a RULE that is supposed to ensure Forum harmony, but his continual ranting is having a greater adverse affect upon Forum harmony than the breakage of the rule. But he does have the forum rules on his side, so although your point is "socially valid", its not "legally" (Well u know what I mean) valid. So u can't win against him. He's like a corrupt dogmatic politician with the police on his side. You can't win. So just ignore him !

.

What people don't seem to understand is that it isn't spoilers that got Kris banned, or others warned. It's comments like this:

Originally posted by Battlehammer
That was not my opinion of you, that was an observation. My opinion of you is that I think your a five foot nothing virgin who a pussy living in his parent basement........and literally spend every waking moment on this site or whacking it to the sims.

Frankly, I don't see too much abuse of the spoiler rule...don't reveal things that haven't come out yet, and use some common sense with them during the first few days after an issue comes out. It's not rocket science.

But it's the flaming and insults that need to stop. As is usually the case with these things, most of it is being handled via PM, and anything further that's negative or off-topic will be dealt with severely. Thanks.

BACK ON TO SIEGE...........

Originally posted by outavodka
BACK ON TO SIEGE...........

Huh, What's siege? I came onto this thread to debate spoilers, dammit!!!!

Bruce Willis is dead all along.

Kevin Spacey was the guilty one, it was a fake limp.

Brad Pitt was a fictional character created by Ed Norton's own mind.

Dicaprio dies shortly after the Titanic sinks.

Regarding Siege, thoughts/ideas on how it will finally end? How will Norman fall? Someone kill him? Who/how? Any ideas?

There was promo image released ages ago teasing Siege, which had Bucky holding Osborn at gunpoint, perhaps that plays into his downfall....

Originally posted by willRules
Regarding Siege, thoughts/ideas on how it will finally end? How will Norman fall? Someone kill him? Who/how? Any ideas?

There was promo image released ages ago teasing Siege, which had Bucky holding Osborn at gunpoint, perhaps that plays into his downfall....

I'm curious as to how Norman falls perhaps more than anything.

I think that the biggest mistake they could make with Siege is cutting Norman a raw deal post-Siege. I think he either needs to die (Because he'll never have a bigger part in Marvel) or be forced underground and become the opposite to whoever runs the presumably re-established S.H.I.E.L.D. or something.

The trouble is, they've teased the Green Goblin so much that if it doesn't happen people are gonna be disappointed. Well, mislead, perhaps. I won't give a crap if Goblin doesn't return. I never liked Osborn until now. On the other hand, Goblin is nowhere near the threat that Osborn is currently, so it'd be like a negative trade-off. Spidey has handled the Goblin alone for decades, for example. Unless he goes all Goblin on us and Spider-Man does some kind of "This is my fight." schtick, and that's how he

Spoiler:
ends up becoming a full member of The Avengers

Additionally, if he does go mental again, he can't be expected to then sane-himself up and start running A.I.M, Hydra or something similar.

It's quite problematic. I can definitely see a reverse Last Rites-esque story happening though. Osborn being down and out, trying to find a way back to former glory, at any cost.

It'd be a shame to see him go, but I think the best way to usher in the new, more vigilant Heroic Age is to kill him. Like Smurph said, they've never really been about that before (My original point as to why Wolverine wouldn't be a good team member), but it's a different era. None of them want a repeat of Dark Reign, so I think they should be thinking about either taking steps to wiping out these continual threats, or building a better prison.

Though, chances are that we will all think up way more elaborate stories for Siege's end and the post-Siege M.U., as fans do sometimes. We just can't then get annoyed when what we made up ourselves isn't what happens. I really don't think that's fair.

I guess the obvious is that he's just Green Goblin again for the long-term. As long as the ending is good and the lead-in to The Heroic Age is acceptable or better, I'm not gonna have much of an issue with Marvel.

This is, however, the arc that I've invested the most money in. Through Civil War/Secret Invasion/Dark Reign/Siege, I've spent a lot of money on it all. If they don't cap this massive collection of interlocking arcs off with something good at LEAST, I'm going to consider whether or not they're a company I should continue to invest in.

We'll see I guess.

-AC

Its good so far

Ignoring AC is the best way, I agree.

Originally posted by Battlehammer

Anyone think any of the x-men will enter the siege? Also whats odd is that Rough-house has yet to be brought forth, I know he not a very well known character, but he make great sense for Normal to have brought to the battle. Also were are the New Thunderbolts during all of this? Has anyone seen Luke yet and is siege before or after assault on new mount Olympus? Also did anyone think the interaction between Nick Fury and Ares son in the last Secret Avengers made no senses?

Originally posted by Battlehammer

Luke was seen in Siege#2.

Wolverine & Clint were in Hercules#141, but not in Siege of yet. I recall Spider-man & woman were in both comics.

i dont really understand how it counts as "ignoring him" when you guys mention him all the time... thats not ignoring. 😐

Thunderbolts:

Spoiler:
The Thunderbolts have a "secret mission" during the Siege, which the Mighty Avengers are going to be attempting to foil. Hence the heavy sneaky-based nature of the team, rather than really big guns

Bendis has said the X-Men won't be involved in particular, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were tangentially involved: stopping the Dark X-Men from interfering, or preventing Osborne from deploying some powerful weapon or something like that.

Spoiler:
Apparently The Sentry throws Asgard on top of Thor after Thor god blasts the shit out of him

Originally posted by Strider120

Spoiler:
Apparently The Sentry throws Asgard on top of Thor after Thor god blasts the shit out of him

r u serious?

Originally posted by Strider120

Spoiler:
Apparently The Sentry throws Asgard on top of Thor after Thor god blasts the shit out of him

Hmmmmmmm...

If this is who I think it is, that spoiler is as accurate as h1s facts (Hint: Not very accurate.).

Originally posted by Strider120

Spoiler:
Apparently The Sentry throws Asgard on top of Thor after Thor god blasts the shit out of him

😆

It's strider.

You should become a permanent member over here. It'll be hilarious.

Does anyone know where i can get a read order for this? I don't want to miss all the tie ins, so if anybody knows where i can get it, i'd appreciate it...

and no. the X-Men most likely won't be involved, tbh...

Originally posted by Strider120

Spoiler:
Apparently The Sentry throws Asgard on top of Thor after Thor god blasts the shit out of him

The fact that your account has been restricted, make me think this is probably bull shit.

I hate it when characters throw, over the top crazy stuff, like an Entire floating Continent . Not only is it ridiculously implausible, Its unlikely to cause a Kill Blow against some like Thor. Unless hes throwing it at "meteoric speed", in which case he going to taking out a lot of the surface of the planet as well as Thor. Pragmatically, he might as well throw something with a LOT less mass, but with far greater Velocity. A car moving at .99999999999999999 % of the speed of light, is going to have as much Impact as a Island size land mass traveling a few hundred miles an hour.