Thanos vs Superman/Silver Surfer/Thor/Gladiator

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you've clearly not only demonstrated you don't get comics but you misinterpret things incorrectly while making a big deal about it.

What difference does magic make here when creating a clone? Seriously, I really don't know why you troll me when you clearly don't understand comics in general.

facepalm

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't care what other sites claim as I read the comic and nowhere did it state Warrior was equal to Gladiator strength. It's beyond laughable to even suggest such a thing.

No, you've clearly not only demonstrated you don't get comics but you misinterpret things incorrectly while making a big deal about it.

What difference does magic make here when creating a clone? Seriously, I really don't know why you troll me when you clearly don't understand comics in general.

Originally posted by BUSTER BLADER!!
Supreme is above current superman by a large degree. They are clones of pre-crisis superman, not current superman. Gladiator and supreme have nothing to do with current superman, thats the mistake people make. Thinking they are clones of current superman which they are not.

PC Supes had feats way above Glads level. Using planetoids and astroids as weapons, destroying star systems, towing 14+ planets as a teenager. Glads is a clone of the character, that goes beyond eras.

His feats with his power are also less than current Supes. His HV, combat speed and durability feats are lower than current Supes.

For some reason 'Buster Blader' sounds familar. Yu-Gi-Oh?

You watched yu gi oh? What a dork. 😛

Yu-Gi-Oh revolutionized an era.

It was popular back in highschool but I just couldn't get over the retarded character designs. 😬 Didn't understand how some guys loved it to the point of getting into the whole trading thing.

Originally posted by Allankles
PC Supes had feats way above Glads level. Using planetoids and astroids as weapons, destroying star systems, towing 14+ planets as a teenager. Glads is a clone of the character, that goes beyond eras.

His feats with his power are also less than current Supes. His HV, combat speed and durability feats are lower than current Supes.

lol at the 'highschool' portion of your post.

Japanese shit is always weird. Luckily DBZ, Pokemon, Yu-Gi-Oh are the only stuff I liked from there (aside from MMA).

To each is own. I liked none of those shows, outside of Transformers and some other show involving a giant mech called Ramrod (sp?).

I only got into anime after high school because of adult swim (Samurai Champloo and a few others).

Originally posted by BUSTER BLADER!!
False.

Dude PC Supes could threaten the fabric of the multiverse by breaking dimensional barriers with his speed. He destroyed a strar system by accident and then rebuilt it.

Glads doesn't operate at that level, and his powers generally don't operate to the level of current Supes, who appears more powerful or at the very least, more expressive with his powers - understandably, he's written a lot more.

Originally posted by Spire
facepalm

Originally posted by BUSTER BLADER!!
Ok, lets do it your way.. In the comic, thanos states that 3 of them rivals his might (key word is might ).. One is lower ( warrior ).... And you say the 5th ( omega ) is twice as strong as galactus... ironman is not in thanos strength class, nor is strange, nor mister x right? But galactus is more powerful than thanos right? Good, makes sense that combining DNA will make a more power creation ( key word powerful )... Now going by your way, how can he make a creature 4x stronger than himself? By combining DNA with a weaker creature? No... By combining DNA with an equal? No, he gains nothing there either... By combining DNA with a stronger being? ( key word stronger ) BINGO!!

Your logic is off and wishful thinking. When he created a clone of Galactus he made it more powerful than Galactus so creating a clone of Gladiator he can also make more powerful than the original. It's never been stated to be an equal to Gladiator in terms of strength anyways.

Originally posted by Allankles
Dude PC Supes could threaten the fabric of the multiverse by breaking dimensional barriers with his speed. He destroyed a strar system by accident and then rebuilt it.

Glads doesn't operate at that level, and his powers generally don't operate to the level of current Supes, who appears more powerful or at the very least, more expressive with his powers - understandably, he's written a lot more.

Originally posted by BUSTER BLADER!!
Current superman is not on the level of supreme or gladiator when it comes to strength, speed, combat speed, fighting abilities or durability... Current superman has been around far longer than them and is a hero, yet in the few appearances that gladiator and supreme have, they have done things that superman has never done. Gladiator has destroyed a planet with just his strength, flew at 100x lightspeed, survived and contained an explosion that would have destroyed half the solar system, fought in nao-seconds, taken blasts from thors hammer and shots from that same hammer, then a blast from thor girl that rivaled Odin himself and still got up and talked to Odin. All of this on panel... Now show me superman ( on panel ) doing anything close to this and able to walk away or stated on panel.

team wins , SS is the weakest link followed by gladiator but together with superman and thor the team wins and superman is the bigest threat to thanos here he is much stronger then thor who is at strength barrelly at hercules level

Originally posted by Allankles
Dude PC Supes could threaten the fabric of the multiverse by breaking dimensional barriers with his speed. He destroyed a strar system by accident and then rebuilt it.

Glads doesn't operate at that level, and his powers generally don't operate to the level of current Supes, who appears more powerful or at the very least, more expressive with his powers - understandably, he's written a lot more.

Allan…. I have a question for you… Do you feel superman is stronger than thanos… do you feel supes is more durable than Thanos?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I knew you had nothing.

facepalm

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you've clearly not only demonstrated you don't get comics but you misinterpret things incorrectly while making a big deal about it.

What difference does magic make here when creating a clone? Seriously, I really don't know why you troll me when you clearly don't understand comics in general.

Now, aside from the massive dose of irony that, no doubt, would be enough to kill small animals, the critical thinking skills exercised here would be enough to render even the most comatose of persons baffled.

The argument that was made went something like this:

Gladiator is 4 times as strong as Thanos. Thanos used Gladiator's DNA to create Warrior. Adam claimed Warrior was 5 times as strong as Thanos.

Now, here is a response based on the happenings that transpired within the pages of Infinity Abyss. Happenings that were impossible to miss:

DNA from Thanos and Gladiator were added to the mix along with tech and magic.

Now, someone applying a bit of critical thinking would easily see the relevance/importance in such a thing.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Allan…. I have a question for you… Do you feel superman is stronger than thanos… do you feel supes is more durable than Thanos?

He's stronger than Thanos. He has better sharp point durability than Thanos though I'd say Thanos has slightly better energy durability on average. I don't think Supes would shrug off SS blasts as easily, for instance. But Supes has high end energy durability feats that are above Thanos' best imo.

Thanos is better on average in durability, although to be fair he hasn't been exposed to the punishment Supes has. For instance Supes was quadruple teamed for a sustained period by some physically powerful gods, forced him to retreat and handle them with sound tactics.

Thanos is tough, but Supes is experienced in fighting through very compromising positions, and that makes him tougher in his own way.

Originally posted by Allankles
He's stronger than Thanos. He has better sharp point durability than Thanos though I'd say Thanos has slightly better energy durability on average. I don't think Supes would shrug off SS blasts as easily, for instance. But Supes has high end energy durability feats that are above Thanos' best imo.

Thanos is better on average in durability, although to be fair he hasn't been exposed to the punishment Supes has. For instance Supes was quadruple teamed for a sustained period by some physically powerful gods, forced him to retreat and handle them with sound tactics.

Thanos is tough, but Supes is experienced in fighting through very compromising positions, and that makes him tougher in his own way.

Ummm okay. Well we agree that Thanos has better durability or as you put it.. better average durability. It's also fair to mention that Thanos hasn't been exposed to the amount of durability variables that Supes has, which is a fair point. However, he doesn't have the low showings that Supes does as well which is why I think we both come to the same conclusion about over durability. However, what I'm confused on and what you to expand upon a bit.. is the Supes is stronger than Thanos. What exactly are you basing this on? I hope it's not solely on the "I have to save the universe by lifting 'this' feats" that Supes has to do.

Originally posted by Spire
facepalm

Now, aside from the massive dose of irony that, no doubt, would be enough to kill small animals, the critical thinking skills exercised here would be enough to render even the most comatose of persons baffled.

The argument that was made went something like this:

Gladiator is 4 times as strong as Thanos. Thanos used Gladiator's DNA to create Warrior. Adam claimed Warrior was 5 times as strong as Thanos.

Now, here is a response based on the happenings that transpired within the pages of Infinity Abyss. Happenings that were impossible to miss:

DNA from Thanos and Gladiator were added to the mix along with tech and magic.

Now, someone applying a bit of critical thinking would easily see the relevance/importance in such a thing.

I know this wasn't proven but I am simply attacking your ridiculous logic here.

Originally posted by Allankles
He's stronger than Thanos. He has better sharp point durability than Thanos though I'd say Thanos has slightly better energy durability on average. I don't think Supes would shrug off SS blasts as easily, for instance. But Supes has high end energy durability feats that are above Thanos' best imo.

Thanos is better on average in durability, although to be fair he hasn't been exposed to the punishment Supes has. For instance Supes was quadruple teamed for a sustained period by some physically powerful gods, forced him to retreat and handle them with sound tactics.

Thanos is tough, but Supes is experienced in fighting through very compromising positions, and that makes him tougher in his own way.