Wolverine vs Thor

Started by Warlord7 pages

PIS can work in many ways. If Namor can one shot Wolverine WWH fight could be PIS.

In addition Wolverine being faster than someone that can move fatser than Heimdal can see can be seen as PIS too.

It all has to do with which character you want to favor.

Originally posted by Warlord

It all has to do with which character you want to favor.

or majority and consistant showings?

whats the ratio for logan going toe 2 toe with bricks and holding ground...to the times logan is 1 shotted?

laughable.

so based on consistant showings and thier most recent fight no less, Logan has a hell of a chance here.

Originally posted by Starscream M
Wolverine actually did better against Rulk than either Thor or Hulk.

wolverine did much better than Uatu Grandmaster and Surfer...

we all know Loeb can't write 😕

This is h2h only, no flying not magic powers. That is the only reason why I would give it to Logan. Thor with his normal powerset would always win 10/10.

H2H Mister X with Adamantium Katanas vs Thor? ;D

Originally posted by Warlord
PIS can work in many ways. If Namor can one shot Wolverine WWH fight could be PIS.

In addition Wolverine being faster than someone that can move fatser than Heimdal can see can be seen as PIS too.

It all has to do with which character you want to favor.

thats why we rely on majority showings

majority showings, Wolverine has taken far more than Namor's punch to be KOed....hence the Namor event was PIS

Originally posted by Starscream M
Wolverine actually did better against Rulk than either Thor or Hulk.

Ever heard of bad writing?

seriously if we take out that Wolverine simply blinded Rulk, or better said let's take the whole fight away and put these 2 against each other with their feats they've accomplished, by that Wolverine would get annihilated by Rulk I hate it when people totally rely on a fight that was in a comic and then say that it would be here the same outcome.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Ever heard of bad writing?

seriously if we take out that Wolverine simply blinded Rulk, or better said let's take the whole fight away and put these 2 against each other with their feats they've accomplished, by that Wolverine would get annihilated by Rulk I hate it when people totally rely on a fight that was in a comic and then say that it would be here the same outcome.

I hate it when people rely on feats in comics and consider that what they like good writing, while dismissing other feats considering it bad writing and expecting others to accept their "common sense". Oh wait, isn't this not what KMC versus is for? 😉

We talk about comics, it's no science and it's not serious.
It's just fun. Sharing the own view with others.
And since Loeb is quite successful, doing what he does, it can't be that bad :bag: .

Thor, hard.

and

Comics released strictly online or on web sites will not be considered proof in the Comic Book Versus Forum

and 6 pages of shit does not magically erase all of Thor's former showings. Being too fast for Adam Warlock to handle oughta be sufficient.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Thor, hard.
which scenario?

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Thor, hard.

is that based on his 1-slash 1-wound durablity? or The self stated "dodging my best shots"?

Originally posted by Juk3n
or majority and consistant showings?

whats the ratio for logan going toe 2 toe with bricks and holding ground...to the times logan is 1 shotted?

laughable.

so based on consistant showings and thier most recent fight no less, Logan has a hell of a chance here.

Then we should be using the majority of Thor's speed showings. Guys like surfer Hyperion etc would laugh at Thor if his speed was just below Wolverine's

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
I hate it when people rely on feats in comics and consider that what they like good writing, while dismissing other feats considering it bad writing and expecting others to accept their "common sense". Oh wait, isn't this not what KMC versus is for? 😉

We talk about comics, it's no science and it's not serious.
It's just fun. Sharing the own view with others.
And since Loeb is quite successful, doing what he does, it can't be that bad :bag: .

Well a lot of children reading comics 🙂

I get your point but in this case really just look at how Rulk was portrayed before that and then suddenly *plop* he's a jobber and whinin' around for everything... It makes sense in a way cause he' becoming a good guy if I got it right

Originally posted by Starscream M
thats why we rely on majority showings

majority showings, Wolverine has taken far more than Namor's punch to be KOed....hence the Namor event was PIS

just as wolverine being faster is PIS

Originally posted by Warlord
Then we should be using the majority of Thor's speed showings. Guys like surfer Hyperion etc would laugh at Thor if his speed was just below Wolverine's
he's fought hulk and hercules numerous times, and I don't ever recall thor having a speed advantage

Originally posted by Warlord
just as wolverine being faster is PIS
wolverine is faster than hulk

hulk's speed = thor's speed

wolverine is faster (not by much) than thor. Thor can still tag him imo.

Originally posted by Starscream M
he's fought hulk and hercules numerous times, and I don't ever recall thor having a speed advantage

surfer and gladiator never seemed to have speed advantage against Hulk, would you consider them at the same speed tier?

Originally posted by Juk3n
is that based on his 1-slash 1-wound durablity? or The self stated "dodging my best shots"?

It's based off of me knowing more than the idiots who go by 1 online comic, which does not go on KMC according to rules, which completely contradicts Thor's earlier showings. Hell, the 6 pages long shit even contradicted itself, Thor did hit Wolverine, several times!

So I don't know whether it's the fact that you don't read the rules, do not read thor comics or simply can not see what is happening in the comics, but all three point towards you being an idiot and flat out wrong.

Originally posted by Warlord
surfer and gladiator never seemed to have speed advantage against Hulk, would you consider them at the same speed tier?
the difference is I've seen Surfer and Gladiator do speedblitz in a fight, so I know they're capable of that. I've never seen thor speedblitz anyone.

Originally posted by Starscream M

hulk's speed = thor's speed

has Hulk ever been mentioned to be operating at lightspeed?

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
It's based off of me knowing more than the idiots who go by 1 online comic, which does not go on KMC according to rules, which completely contradicts Thor's earlier showings. Hell, the 6 pages long shit even contradicted itself, Thor did hit Wolverine, several times!

So I don't know whether it's the fact that you don't read the rules, do not read thor comics or simply can not see what is happening in the comics, but all three point towards you being an idiot and flat out wrong.

kris, there's no need for such hostility.