Kalibak vs Wolverine

Started by carver931 pages

Wolverine wins this 6 or 7 out of ten.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
So did Wolverine lose?

Probably.

Wolverine gets one or two on being lucky. Can't see him beating any kalibak except the Tony Tiger one.

Originally posted by jinzin
Yes, because that would then take precedence over the many many times Wolverine's faired in a superior fashion over bricks..?

😐

So, does that mean by default that no Hercules win over Logan on panel can ever be counted because Wolverine has beaten 'other' 'bricks'?

Originally posted by Blanket
So, does that mean by default that no Hercules win over Logan on panel can ever be counted because Wolverine has beaten 'other' 'bricks'?

i was wondering the same thing . . .

and i don't care about the other bricks. i was speaking of a definitive beating by hercules, specifically. but, meh.

Kalibak

Wolverine: 7/10

Faster
Better fighter
Adamantium claws that would rip through kalibak like paper
More Agile
And has a damage soak that is pretty much top tier.

He is an upgraded kalibak minus the superstrength.

If this is the Kalibak that appeared in Firestorm all Kalibak has to do is look at him.

Originally posted by leonidas
i was wondering the same thing . . .

and i don't care about the other bricks. i was speaking of a definitive beating by hercules, specifically. but, meh.

I think your main problem was assuming that brick A was any different than brick B. By now we should all know that all bricks are the same. It's common sense really. 😬

Hell, I even recall h2h Thanos Brickos losing to Wolverine...

Originally posted by -K-M-
If this is the Kalibak that appeared in Firestorm all Kalibak has to do is look at him.

I agree but thats not the normal kalibak. If we're using that kalibak we can use the death wolverine that had tech out the a**.

Originally posted by carver9
I agree but thats not the normal kalibak. If we're using that kalibak we can use the death wolverine that had tech out the a**.
Would that even make a difference?

Originally posted by Blanket
Would that even make a difference?

No 🙁

Originally posted by carver9
Faster

based on?

Adamantium claws that would rip through kalibak like paper

proof?

Originally posted by -Pr-
based on?

proof?

I would LOVE to compare speed feats. The only thing you might bring up is who he has tagged in a fight who really wasnt using super speed when fighting him.

Originally posted by carver9
I would LOVE to compare speed feats. The only thing you might bring up is who he has tagged in a fight who really wasnt using super speed when fighting him.

i just wondered where you got the idea that logan was faster than kalibak.

and there's also the question of his durability...

Originally posted by -Pr-
i just wondered where you got the idea that logan was faster than kalibak.

and there's also the question of his durability...

Wolverine has cut people that are more durable than Kalibak. Wolverine being able to slice up Kalibak is pretty obvious if you ask me.

Going by speed feats, Wolverine has him by a land slide. This fight would go like wolverine vs rulk, Wolverine vs Hulk, Wolverine vs Sasquash, etc...

Hell be bouncing all around him.

Originally posted by carver9
Wolverine has cut people that are more durable than Kalibak. Wolverine being able to slice up Kalibak is pretty obvious if you ask me.

Going by speed feats, Wolverine has him by a land slide. This fight would go like wolverine vs rulk, Wolverine vs Hulk, Wolverine vs Sasquash, etc...

Hell be bouncing all around him.

like who?

even if he had the speed feats (which i'm not sure he does), that still doesn't mean he has the force required to cut kalibak.

Originally posted by carver9
Wolverine vs Sasquash, etc...

Errrr? Wolverine has never cut Sasquatch or beat him or even came close to it 😬

In either of their encounters Wolverine was not bouncing around Walter and Walter tagging him pretty easily.

Originally posted by carver9
Wolverine has cut people that are more durable than Kalibak. Wolverine being able to slice up Kalibak is pretty obvious if you ask me.

Going by speed feats, Wolverine has him by a land slide. This fight would go like wolverine vs rulk, Wolverine vs Hulk, Wolverine vs Sasquash, etc...

Hell be bouncing all around him.

In other words, you have no idea what goes on in comics?

Originally posted by -Pr-
like who?

even if he had the speed feats (which i'm not sure he does), that still doesn't mean he has the force required to cut kalibak.

I just name two people that are more durable than him or just as durable. Kalibak isnt known for his durability, hes strong but hes no where as close to being as durable as the hulk or rulk if we compare feats and wolverine has slice through both pretty easily.