Superman's Hardest Punch vs Thor's Hardest Mjolnir Slam

Started by ODG50 pages

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Excuse me all mighty, for getting you out of your basement in order to debate against us lowlies.
So it's my fault now, that instead of casually talking about this with throwaway comments like I was before, I am discussing this in-depthly with you? Make up your mind as to whether or not you want a complete and utter dressing-down to go with your hamfisted necrobumps of issues that were killed dead by mods on the very page right before you decided to bring it up again.
Originally posted by Rao Kal El
As for the feat itself. didn't you said the time flux helped? I think I have said that since the beggining, the feat has CONTEXT. AND I have not said the time flux did not helped, still only the kryptoninas fighting achieved this. Your head is so much up your @ss that you don't even acknowledge that I have said since the begining that the feat has context, should I repeat that again? the feat has context, but still it was only achieved by kryptonians.

It goes according to what PR say

Now you get it?

An additional stronger Kryptonian fighting with those very same Kryptonians didn't achieve this. Your head is so much up your own @ss that you don't even acknowledge that despite your so-called "acceptance" of context, you still try to make this non-feat out to be some sort of testament to a Kryptonian's strength when a superior Kryptonian's strength achieved no such thing. Ergo, it's far more an attestation to the environmental factors -- the DC Multiversal flux and the artificially constructed, incomplete Earth-2 setting -- they were dealing with, than anything.

Then start shutting up about it instead of reviving a discussion that was ended by mods.

Now you get it?

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
👆, though I do not know If I am thumbing you up for calling me inept

I was just giving my opinion onto why I did not consider this a world shattering feat, others might but I don't. I consider this a time shattering feat with context behind and I have said that since the begining.

But somehow ODI has a personal vendetta with me 😂

But that's just the thing, the fact that it has context makes this a "non-feat".

It'd be like someone claiming Surfer has " double abstract one-shot killing power" because he used the crunch on T&A.

Or Captain America having "Universe moving power" because he used the IG to save our reality.

Or Thor having "Elder God/Abstract killing power" because he killed Demogorge when he struck at its heart.

Context removes a TON of viability from a "feat". And we need to focus on the viable AND quantifiable if we want to debate on solid ground.

Again, is it entirely possible to move on to a different "feat" and just drop this one? Or is having the last word that important to you?

Originally posted by ODG
So it's my fault now, that instead of casually talking about this with throwaway comments like I was before, I am discussing this in-depthly with you? Make up your mind as to whether or not you want a complete and utter dressing-down to go with your hamfisted necrobumps of issues that were killed dead by mods on the very page right before you decided to bring it up again. An additional stronger Kryptonian fighting with those very same Kryptonians didn't achieve this. Your head is so much up your own @ss that you don't even acknowledge that despite your so-called "acceptance" of context, you still try to make this non-feat out to be some sort of testament to a Kryptonian's strength when a superior Kryptonian's strength achieved no such thing. Ergo, it's far more an attestation to the environmental factors -- the DC Multiversal flux and the artificially constructed, incomplete Earth-2 setting -- they were dealing with, than anything.

Then start shutting up about it instead of reviving a discussion that was ended by mods.

Now you get it?

You still going at it?

You are like a woman arguing

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
You still going at it?

You are like a woman arguing

Who's fault was that in the first place?

Your stupefied silence and backhanded concession is so noted. 👆

Originally posted by Nibedicus
But that's just the thing, the fact that it has context makes this a "non-feat".

It'd be like someone claiming Surfer has " double abstract one-shot killing power" because he used the crunch on T&A.

Or Captain America having "Universe moving power" because he used the IG to save our reality.

Or Thor having "Elder God/Abstract killing power" because he killed Demogorge when he struck at its heart.

Context removes a TON of viability from a "feat". And we need to focus on the viable AND quantifiable if we want to debate on solid ground.

Again, is it entirely possible to move on to a different "feat" and just drop this one? Or is having the last word that important to you?

👆 Ok cool

Originally posted by ODG
Who's fault was that in the first place?

Your stupefied silence and backhanded concession is so noted. 👆

Shut up woman!

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
👆 Ok cool

Cool! Ok moving on...

Got scans of the DS "feat" and what DS was able to tank while he was in that form?

Got any context we need to keep an eye on?

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Shut up woman!
I can taste the tears dripping all over your keyboard from across the internet.

YouTube video

Originally posted by ODG
So it's my fault now, that instead of casually talking about this with throwaway comments like I was before, I am discussing this in-depthly with you? Make up your mind as to whether or not you want a complete and utter dressing-down to go with your hamfisted necrobumps of issues that were killed dead by mods on the very page right before you decided to bring it up again. An additional stronger Kryptonian fighting with those very same Kryptonians didn't achieve this. Your head is so much up your own @ss that you don't even acknowledge that despite your so-called "acceptance" of context, you still try to make this non-feat out to be some sort of testament to a Kryptonian's strength when a superior Kryptonian's strength achieved no such thing. Ergo, it's far more an attestation to the environmental factors -- the DC Multiversal flux and the artificially constructed, incomplete Earth-2 setting -- they were dealing with, than anything.

Then start shutting up about it instead of reviving a discussion that was ended by mods.

Now you get it?


And just so you know. I did not read the mod ruling on it. I just throw in my opinion on the feat onto why I don't think is a world shattering feat, but somehow you think I was trying to resurrect the feat? 😂

OK, Now I am finally convinced that you think like a woman, making things up in your mind.

Originally posted by ODG
I can taste the tears dripping all over your keyboard from across the internet.

YouTube video

Believe me I am not you 😂 (^u^)=0-

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
👆, though I do not know If I am thumbing you up for calling me inept

I was just giving my opinion onto why I did not consider this a world shattering feat, others might but I don't. I consider this a time shattering feat with context behind and I have said that since the begining.

But somehow ODI has a personal vendetta with me 😂

Wasn't referring to you, as you admitted there was context. Just some "other" people. 😖hifty:

It's fine, this feat has been debated to death. Whatever, let's just move on.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Believe me I am not you 😂 (^u^)=0-
In other words, "I know you are, but what am I?"

I wasn't planning to reduce you to the mental state of a 5 yr old. But, ok, whatever.

Originally posted by ODG
In other words, "I know you are, but what am I?"

I wasn't planning to reduce you to the mental state of a 5 yr old. But, ok, whatever.

No, just simply "I am not you" as easy as that.

Like a man will tell to a woman "I am not your Ex-boyfriend"

That is the way I am talking to you.

You know how is that don't you?

Now woman, I'm going to get a beer, so you can just keep yapping all you want.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
And just so you know. I did not read the mod ruling on it. I just throw in my opinion on the feat onto why I don't think is a world shattering feat, but somehow you think I was trying to resurrect the feat? 😂

OK, Now I am finally convinced that you think like a woman, making things up in your mind.

Well, typically, when a mod makes his ruling known and then reminds people that they're not supposed to bring it up again DURING the deconstruction conversation that ensued, I would have expected you to take some notice. I mean, he did remind us right after my response and right before your counter-response after all: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=520290&pagenumber=43

But I get that the mods were willfully hiding their intentions. It's like an optical illusion. -Pr- inserting a post right in the middle of our's. It's so overt... it's covert. Pardon me for being unreasonable. They are crafty lil buggers.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
No, just simply "I am not you" as easy as that.

Like a man will tell to a woman "I am not your Ex-boyfriend"

That is the way I am talking to you.

You know how is that don't you?

Yes, yes, you are projecting a dismissive attitude designed to subvert the appearance of your fragile state of mind this conversation that has completely backfired into your face has left you with. And worse-case scenario, I'll get chewed out along with you for pouring salt in your wounds. I've never seen maneuver before!

ha-som

Originally posted by ODG
Well, typically, when a mod makes his ruling known and then reminds people that they're not supposed to bring it up again [b]DURING the deconstruction conversation that ensued, I would have expected you to take some notice. I mean, he did remind us right after my response and right before your counter-response after all: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=520290&pagenumber=43

But I get that the mods were willfully hiding their intentions. It's like an optical illusion. -Pr- inserting a post right in the middle of our's. It's so overt... it's covert. Pardon me for being unreasonable. They are crafty lil buggers.

[/B]

Woman, I though that was about some other sh1t, not what We were discussing

Originally posted by ODG
Yes, yes, you are projecting a dismissive attitude designed to subvert the appearance of your fragile state of mind this conversation that has completely backfired into your face has left you with. And worse-case scenario, I'll get chewed out along with you for pouring salt in your wounds. I've never seen maneuver before!

ha-som

😂 Keep yapping girl, that is why I like you.

This thread degenerated rather quickly.

I'm out!

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Woman, I though that was about some other sh1t, not what We were discussing

😂 Keep yapping girl, that is why I like you.

Because clearly a mod wouldn't have addressed your desperate necrobump based on the backlash you received from everyone else. One must admire the completely undeserved self-confidence, I suppose?

I'm sure you've relished every single exchange beforehand and how they've ended up for you, including this one. kinda

Originally posted by Nibedicus
This thread degenerated rather quickly.

I'm out!

😂

Originally posted by abhilegend
Superman with mjolnir>Superman. How does that prove Thor with mjolnir> Superman country1000?
I live in the city thank you. Superman said that he had to keep the hammers momentium. Guess he knew he was too weak to wield it and then strike. Post the scan please.

So ODG thinks two punches from SBP not breaking the timestream means the feat from Kal-L and Kal-El is invalid without any sort of proof and shit? Let me take this route and invalid nearly all of Thor's feats.

awesome

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
At least you aren't pretending there was any physical aspect to it and the shattering of the world was simply a metaphor.

The time stream was affected, but it was their own personal histories, not the time stream.

And it was also in large part due to the circumstances of Infinite Crisis. In this case, the writer clarified it to be a result of them being Universal counterparts.


Talk to me rage. This is between us sweetie. The writer said that it happens everytime two counterparts contact each other. Tell me why that didn't happen here.

http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc141/Supergirl_Respect/supvspow.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc141/Supergirl_Respect/supvspow2.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc141/Supergirl_Respect/supvspow3.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc141/Supergirl_Respect/supvspow4.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc141/Supergirl_Respect/supvspow5.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc141/Supergirl_Respect/supvspow6.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc141/Supergirl_Respect/supvspow7.jpg

Not to mention using interviews is against forum rules. Do I have to remind you every time?