Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable

Started by DarkSaint8528 pages

@Carver:

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
How so?

You don't think these types of feats are proof of character levels. Yet when abhi asks for examples to show proof of character levels.....you post this.

So are they or are they not, examples of what Surfer can do?

I dont debate against people that say they accept nothing but high showings but under the same breath, debate me on a high showing.

Originally posted by carver9
I dont debate against people that say they accept nothing but high showings but under the same breath, debate me on a high showing.

I accept it. I'm asking why YOU are using it, though, when you say you don't use them? That's the question.

A reminder of what I said, Carv:

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
@Carver:

I do. I don't think he dies to 20 WWH punches, because of that showing. I am [b]not disputing it.

This is why I asked if you can read, lmao.

So you don't think it counts, OK. Then why answer abhi with it if you don't think it counts? [/B]

Originally posted by carver9
So they said they are lucky they survived for no reason? Who said they tanked it? They were obviously impacted by the blast, but the ft is, they survived.

It wasn't their durability as clearly stated by Warlock.
Originally posted by Smurph
Well it's an artistic rendition that appears to come between Superman and the blast:

It's difficult with the overlap of orange and yellow but you can see the blast doesn't actually reach him.

I don't think Superman took a direct blast, I think it just caused the secondary breach that they needed to roll with or be torn apart?


Yeah, the blast was somehow stopped in the vacuum of space.

😂

Originally posted by leonidas
it very clearly didn't hit him as the drawing of the impact is well in front of him. not sure how or why that is could possibly be up for debate lol

😂

The sheer mental gymnastics here.

Originally posted by abhilegend
It wasn't their durability as clearly stated by Warlock.
Yeah, the blast was somehow stopped in the vacuum of space.

😂
😂

The sheer mental gymnastics here.

What was it? Also, Warlock said he was lucky to survive the attack, Surfer didn't say this.

Don't even know why you are going down this avenue, Abhi.

Carver has said before that he does not use high end feats for his characters. So simply ask him if the showing he sent for Surfer is an average for him. Plain and simple.

Watch him squirm. There is no need to be on the defensive - no matter what you posted, you'd get attacked. The real question is why do you have to match a showing that the poster - Carver9 - does not even believe is usable in a forum fight.

Originally posted by carver9
What was it? Also, Warlock said he was lucky to survive the attack, Surfer didn't say this.

Read your own ****ing scan, retard.

https://ibb.co/Dfv8Grv5

"Sheer luck WE survived"

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Don't even know why you are going down this avenue, Abhi.

Carver has said before that he does not use high end feats for his characters. So simply ask him if the showing he sent for Surfer is an average for him. Plain and simple.

Watch him squirm. There is no need to be on the defensive - no matter what you posted, you'd get attacked. The real question is why do you have to match a showing that the poster - Carver9 - does not even believe is usable in a forum fight.


His monkey brain fascinates me.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Read your own ****ing scan, retard.

https://ibb.co/Dfv8Grv5

"Sheer luck WE survived"

They were hit by the attack. They survived it. It's a durability showing. Accept it and move on.

Originally posted by carver9
They were hit by the attack. They survived it. It's a durability showing. Accept it and move on.

Not according to the comic.

Originally posted by carver9
They were hit by the attack. They survived it. It's a durability showing. Accept it and move on.

But would YOU accept it in a forum fight?

If yes, welcome to my club of high showings.

If no, then why post it, hypocrite?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
But would YOU consider it usable in a forum fight?

If yes, welcome to my club of high showings.

If no, then why post it, hypocrite?

Only in this thread since this is a durability argument. The goal here is to show which character has the best durability to withstand the attacks given by the OP. Abhi then asked me what puts Surfer above Superman, so I showed him.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Not according to the comic.

He had to have been hit by the attack to feel lucky he survived it. We clearly see them rolled over. You're denial is unbound.

Originally posted by carver9
He had to have been hit by the attack to feel lucky he survived it. We clearly see them rolled over. You're denial is unbound.

The comic attribute it to sheer luck, not their durability. Your retardness is infinite.

Originally posted by carver9
Only in this thread since this is a durability argument. The goal here is to show which character has the best durability to withstand the attacks given by the OP. Abhi then asked me what puts Surfer above Superman, so I showed him.

So high-end outliers count if it is to show durability. Very interesting. Very interesting indeed.

Also, Abhi was asking for feats, yes, but I don't think he wants random feats that are unusable. But since you think high end outliers count IF it is for durabilty, excellent.

http://i.imgur.com/qoHdTxy.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Hk95Za1.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/I5YUPU9.jpg

Superman surviving such an explosion which destroys the universe, rips a hole in timestream and collapse realities on themselves and which was eventually going to destroy the entire creation?

Originally posted by abhilegend
http://i.imgur.com/qoHdTxy.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Hk95Za1.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/I5YUPU9.jpg

Superman surviving such an explosion which destroys the universe, rips a hole in timestream and collapse realities on themselves and which was eventually going to destroy the entire creation?

Batman surviving WW is completely usable, as it is a durability feat. Licking my lips at this new era of 'what counts, and what doesn't'.

Originally posted by abhilegend
It wasn't their durability as clearly stated by Warlock.
Yeah, the blast was somehow stopped in the vacuum of space.

😂
😂

The sheer mental gymnastics here.

i'll concede one point--it's clearly debateable. wherever they are, whatever we call that space, it's possible some distortion blocked it and as it impacts CLEARLY away from him that seems perfectly possible but it's also possible it hit him and he moved back i guess. i mean that would be a terrible way of showing it and makes no sense but i guess it's possible *shrug*

Originally posted by leonidas
i'll concede one point--it's clearly debateable. wherever they are, whatever we call that space, it's possible some distortion blocked it and as it impacts CLEARLY away from him that seems perfectly possible but it's also possible it hit him and he moved back i guess. i mean that would be a terrible way of showing it and makes no sense but i guess it's possible *shrug*

Some unrelated thoughts.
Even though modern comics don't treat the readers as 6-7 year old kids, so rarely use a bunch of text to explain something clearly is shown on panel
But occasionally, the art simply isn't that good/clear, and I often hope that comics can sometimes go back to the Golden/Silver Age style, using words to avoid confusion when this happens