Originally posted by SpireAlways a straight forward answer. You really aren't a very good debater and won't even man up and answer the question. Ten times his strength though is pretty unfair for those he fights in this state.
The point is, if you read the scan and understand it, there really isn't anything to talk about considering how straight forward it is.
Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Thor only has to direct his hammer at Hal and suck in that energy. Seeing as Hal can't even stop the manhunters from doing it, he'd be hard pressed to stop Mjolnir 🙂How is that a scan of bad judgement, or how does it work against him in any way?
Probably, being in warrior 'madness'. Balder is clearly saying such.
Thor might kill when not needed or might be defeated by a weaker foe.
Originally posted by SpireBut he wasn't defeated by a weaker foe. Not once. You posting someone else's opinion when we saw the direct opposite is ridiculous. Why even post it.
Probably, being in warrior 'madness'. Balder is clearly saying such.Thor might kill when not needed or might be defeated by a weaker foe.
Originally posted by Spire
Probably, being in warrior 'madness'. Balder is clearly saying such.Thor might kill when not needed or might be defeated by a weaker foe.
Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Yeah, but we've never seen this stuff go down. From what we've seen, Thor's gotten a hella stronger in combat. Though he might unnecessarily kill, that's something which won't matter in a forum fight. Thor would never go Warrior Madness against hal though.
I know, but it doesn't mean we just discard it. The possibility is there.
Is that not the whole point of WM and why Asgardians shouldn't go into it...?
Originally posted by SpireBecause it goes against everything they stand for maybe. They don't go around raping and murdering their opponents when beaten do they?
I know, but it doesn't mean we just discard it. The possibility is there.Is that not the whole point of WM and why Asgardians shouldn't go into it...?
Originally posted by Spire
I know, but it doesn't mean we just discard it. The possibility is there.Is that not the whole point of WM and why Asgardians shouldn't go into it...?
Originally posted by Kris Blaze
It's because it's pretty disgraceful to lose control or whether or not you kill someone or somesuch. Makes no sense seeing as Odin has killed people for -nothing- but them's the breaks. One comment by Balder about how guys in WM might get defeated by weaker opponents does not suddenly mean that we should start assuming Thor will lose when he loses control, seeing as how he's done far better in WM 😐
OK, but the focus really isn't 'defeated by weaker foe', its 'judgement' and 'madness'.
Originally posted by SpireThat's Balder's opinion and since we saw the latter true it's pretty cut and dry. On panel opinions are tossed aside when we see on panel actions.
OK, but the focus really isn't 'defeated by weaker foe', its 'judgement' and 'madness'.
That's like saying the colts can lose with their unbridled confidence to see them go on to win the sbowl and act like that opinion is anything other than an opinion.
Originally posted by -Pr-On kmc he is at his best. If Thor is going balls to the wall Hal is in trouble. If he is fighting typical Thor vs. hero it's much closer. When we see Thor go all out with the power at his disposal he's too powerful for most top tiers to handle.
he's also lost to beings less strong and less durable than superman. its the nature of comics.
I still give the nod to Thor though. He trashed Gladiator the moment he decided not to hold back.
Originally posted by quanchi112
On kmc he is at his best. If Thor is going balls to the wall Hal is in trouble. If he is fighting typical Thor vs. hero it's much closer. When we see Thor go all out with the power at his disposal he's too powerful for most top tiers to handle.I still give the nod to Thor though. He trashed Gladiator the moment he decided not to hold back.
so is hal, though.
Originally posted by quanchi112
That's Balder's opinion and since we saw the latter true it's pretty cut and dry. On panel opinions are tossed aside when we see on panel actions.That's like saying the colts can lose with their unbridled confidence to see them go on to win the sbowl and act like that opinion is anything other than an opinion.
You can toss aside whatever you want. Judgment problems come with WM.
