Sentry vs Thor

Why are people going back to that lame "Thor has been around longer than Sentry" argument?

You want people to give an educated response to a thread you make, they can only work with what's given.

People have to stop with this ridiculous logic. Who cares if one writer made Sentry stronger then his normal levels for one time. Unless the power continues to be the same level, it shouldn't matter too much. It's should be considered another level, an amp, or just another version.
If suddenly Superman does one good fear(destroying a galaxy), but then goes back to being his regular level, does this mean we should use the high high high feat? No, it's dumb. There has to be consistency between issues, authors, and anything else. Almost all authors for Superman, Thor, and SS, and GL keep them at nearly identical levels. If one writers makes Sentry strong, and many others don't, who should we believe, one, or the many?

Originally posted by shokosugi
Sentry is REGULARLY portrayed as a weak and pathetic character. DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THIS????? 😠 😠 😠

What is weak and pathetic about him? Him easily owning a Herald of Galactus? His stalemating WWH who owned just about every major hero/team on Marvel earth? Overloading Absorbing Man with raw power? Resurrecting himself and his dead wife?

Please give some logical reasons for your claim other than your own biased personal opinion.

Until Sentry is written at a consistent high level he will lose to characters that are HH and above.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
People have to stop with this ridiculous logic. Who cares if one writer made Sentry stronger then his normal levels for one time. Unless the power continues to be the same level, it shouldn't matter too much. It's should be considered another level, an amp, or just another version.
If suddenly Superman does one good fear(destroying a galaxy), but then goes back to being his regular level, does this mean we should use the high high high feat? No, it's dumb. There has to be consistency between issues, authors, and anything else. Almost all authors for Superman, Thor, and SS, and GL keep them at nearly identical levels. If one writers makes Sentry strong, and many others don't, who should we believe, one, or the many?

👆

in comics, PMM Sentry (post molecule man) sentry for the win. However in a forum fight, and in the comics if sentry is exposed to be just another nut or the molecule man feat is retconned, Thor 7.5/10.

THOR > SENTRY / SUPEMAN

so wait...getting hit by thor once means he sucks?

What do you call Thor getting blasted by Holocaust?

Originally posted by xJLxKing
People have to stop with this ridiculous logic. Who cares if one writer made Sentry stronger then his normal levels for one time. Unless the power continues to be the same level, it shouldn't matter too much. It's should be considered another level, an amp, or just another version.
If suddenly Superman does one good fear(destroying a galaxy), but then goes back to being his regular level, does this mean we should use the high high high feat? No, it's dumb. There has to be consistency between issues, authors, and anything else. Almost all authors for Superman, Thor, and SS, and GL keep them at nearly identical levels. If one writers makes Sentry strong, and many others don't, who should we believe, one, or the many?

Beating MM is a feat, the act of controlling his molecules is an explanation. It servers to explain why he does what he did. You can ignore the feat, but not the explanation. It serves to give back ground info on Sentry.

Its like saying oh lets ignore Thors ability to absorb energy through MJOLNIR, because Thor has not replicated that feat involving the Null Bomb.

In all reality, that was probably Reynolds Sentry who charged Thor and was dismissed a moment later. Void!Sentry could probably give Thor a decent match and even garner wins if his matter manipulation powers are what they seem to be on paper.

Originally posted by TheKahn
Overloading Absorbing Man with raw power?

Does he actually overload him? It's never said he did and it looked more to me like he did the same thing he did to Owen Reece.

Originally posted by id369
Beating MM is a feat, the act of controlling his molecules is an explanation. It servers to explain why he does what he did. You can ignore the feat, but not the explanation. It serves to give back ground info on Sentry.

Its like saying oh lets ignore Thors ability to absorb energy through MJOLNIR, because Thor has not replicated that feat involving the Null Bomb.

This is Bob and not Void.

Originally posted by The Nuul

This is Bob and not Void.

It looked like Void-lite Sentry to me. His eyes look solid black in the bottom right panel.

Osborn called him Robert after he said he learnt someting today then replied back.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Completely different situation. Like I said, Sentry was portrayed as having near, complete control over his molecules. Unless every other issue portrays Sentry the same way, then you can't claim it. He has no have consistency. You don't drop from defeating someone as high as MM and then getting beat by someone weaker

Lets ignore for the moment that Sentry matter manipulation is a recent revelation.

Sentry needs to apply matter manipulating feats every other issue. Because surely Thor applies his EVERY-OTHER-ISSUE.srsly

😆

I knew the Sentry haters were going to jump all over this. Lets just wait and see what happens in the next few issues when they really fight.

OH! Now you are the one claiming the "lets wait"

Originally posted by xJLxKing
OH! Now you are the one claiming the "lets wait"

Yeah.....😆

Originally posted by tkitna
😆

I knew the Sentry haters were going to jump all over this. Lets just wait and see what happens in the next few issues when they really fight.

Some of use are not haters, we just want to see some consistent feats on a impressive level, we dont buy into the hype or stipulation like you fanboys do.