Originally posted by id369You know what? I'll play along.
Hey guess what I am in the mood. And you not saying much at all.
When Sentry first made that Feat with MM, me and quite a few other people were claiming that we need to wait for a few issues and see what happens. What did a few Sentry Fans say? No! There is no need to, this is his level for sure!!! Now the table have turned and he is the one claiming we need to wait for consistency and see what happens. Some would say it's ironic
Originally posted by xJLxKing
Completely different situation. Like I said, Sentry was portrayed as having near, complete control over his molecules. Unless every other issue portrays Sentry the same way, then you can't claim it.
That is complete and utter bullshit. Practically every character who appears in more than one book has his/her power and abilities depicted differently by different writers. To claim otherwise is a statement of such massive ignorance it boggles the mind.
Superman, as only one example, has shown speed and reflexes on par with the Flash and sufficient enough to make himself practically intangible in some appearances, and yet Solomon Grundy and other bricks are still able to punch him.
Originally posted by xJLxKing
He has no have consistency. You don't drop from defeating someone as high as MM and then getting beat by someone weaker
Says who? You? Don't make me laugh. Everyone who has read comics at any point over the last 80 years can point out numerous instances where characters' powers/abilities have been portrayed inconsistently from one appearance to the next and where certain characters have jobbed to a more popular one or for the sake of a plot-line.
It happens all the time to countless characters. Why you are so determined to hold this only against the Sentry is beyond me.
Originally posted by xJLxKing
You know what? I'll play along.When Sentry first made that Feat with MM, me and quite a few other people were claiming that we need to wait for a few issues and see what happens. What did a few Sentry Fans say? No! There is no need to, this is his level for sure!!! Now the table have turned and he is the one claiming we need to wait for consistency and see what happens. Some would say it's ironic
👆
Originally posted by The Nuul
Some of use are not haters, we just want to see some consistent feats on a impressive level, we dont buy into the hype or stipulation like you fanboys do.
Simply because some people think you holding the Sentry up to hypocritical standards you don't apply to your favored characters, doesn't make them fanboys.
Originally posted by xJLxKing
You know what? I'll play along.When Sentry first made that Feat with MM, me and quite a few other people were claiming that we need to wait for a few issues and see what happens. What did a few Sentry Fans say? No! There is no need to, this is his level for sure!!! Now the table have turned and he is the one claiming we need to wait for consistency and see what happens. Some would say it's ironic
At the vary least it was Thor that dropped Sentry (if he is out).
And not taken out by Norman and his Footers. The fat Asgardian did better Thor, what does that tell you?
Originally posted by tkitna
All of this because Thor hit Sentry with his hammer.Wow
Its been brewing longer that this. I think that because some people have invested so much time and energy in arguing against the Sentry in various threads for so long that they are simply unwilling to admit the possibility that they were wrong in light of new revelations.
Its easier instead to claim that the most recent explanation of the nature of his powers is somehow invalid or must be repeated every time he makes an appearance for some undetermined (and unrealistic) amount of time before they'll be willing to consider it valid.
Originally posted by id369
At the vary least it was Thor that dropped Sentry (if he is out).And not taken out by Norman and his Footers. The fat Asgardian did better Thor, what does that tell you?
Tells me Bendis is as erratic as Sentry.
😆
In all seriousness though, people on both sides of the argument are getting worked up over nothing. Sentry got the jump on Thor, who I assumed was staggered by Sentry's blow. Thor then swatted him away. Thor is then jumped on by Stormin' Norman and his goon sqaud. Thor has fallen to the numbers game before. It's not a high showing/low showing for either character, imo.
Originally posted by xJLxKing
Nice try but you missed the point and you moved to a totally different debate
What point am I missing?
That Sentry is not a bonified Cosmic Killer. He isn’t, no one in this topic are claiming that he is.
so everyone sees it fairly:
Originally posted by psycho gundamhttp://yfrog.com/0csiege1legioncps022j
http://yfrog.com/jpsiege1legioncps023j
http://yfrog.com/jcsiege1legioncps024j
Originally posted by id369
What you need to do is get to the point, with out applying double standards. Or else your entire argument, falls under a big pot of convoluted mess.What point am I missing?
That Sentry is not a bonified Cosmic Killer. He isn’t, no one in this topic are claiming that he is.
Originally posted by id369
Again your not saying a whole lot of nothing.Make clear, and direct points.
1- People did claim that Sentry WAS LEAGUES away for people like Superman, Thor, SS and other. Why? because of ONE feat, just one. Just check the Superman vs Sentry thread.
2- Superman, Thor, SS and GL have consistent feat to put them on High Herald. That's what makes their weak, or very very high feats okay to accept. Sentry just has high, then low, then high, then low. In consistent and hard to accept which is correct