Infinity Gauntlet Vs. Cosmic Armor

Started by Knowsbleed3391 pages
Originally posted by galactusischere
Beyonder and MM were shaking the omniverse.. weren't they? or was that the multi-verse?

They wrecked shit within the prime multiverse. Look at it like this, the 616 reality is the foundation of the prime multiverse. Knock out the foundation and the house comes crumbling down.

In order for a cube to me multiversal it's power would have to be able to extend beyond the prime multiverse into others like The Dark Tower universe or New Universe.

Originally posted by galactusischere
The Odin incident was caused by horrible horrible writting.
But the real per-retcon MM is considered to be more powerful than Galactus.

It wasn't bad writing, its just that it suggests Odin is much more powerful and important than he's ever been shown to be before. When one version of Darkseid was plucked from the past and brought to the 30th Century an entire timeline was destroyed and even the Anti-Monitor was erased. That didn't mean Darkseid was that powerful, just that he had a huge impact on the Universe. Same with Odin. It's not like it was that momentous anyway, the Living Tribunal scarcely noticed it, to him it was like a man watching an ant die.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
It wasn't bad writing, its just that it suggests Odin is much more powerful and important than he's ever been shown to be before. When one version of Darkseid was plucked from the past and brought to the 30th Century an entire timeline was destroyed and even the Anti-Monitor was erased. That didn't mean Darkseid was that powerful, just that he had a huge impact on the Universe. Same with Odin. It's not like it was that momentous anyway, the Living Tribunal scarcely noticed it, to him it was like a man watching an ant die.

Beyonder and Molecule man
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/2365044/CCU2.jpg.html

Originally posted by galactusischere
Beyonder and Molecule man
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/2365044/CCU2.jpg.html

Again that doesn't show any real Multiversal effects. It's no different from Odin's death in terms of scale.

Originally posted by galactusischere
Beyonder and Molecule man
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/2365044/CCU2.jpg.html
Molecule Man and Beyonder are arguably multiversal. But this premise is still completely inapposite as to whether the IG is multiversal. And by extension, irrelevant to whether the IG could beat the CA (which nobody appears to argue is a multiversal artifact).

Whether or not the CA is multiversal isn't in question. CA Supes was outside of the Multiverse, that's something that IG has never done. That's something that is usually reserved for Omnipotents or 4th Wall joke characters.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Whether or not the CA is multiversal isn't in question. CA Supes was outside of the Multiverse, that's something that IG has never done. That's something that is usually reserved for Omnipotents or 4th Wall joke characters.

Mr.Master's scans should be proof enough

Originally posted by galactusischere
Mr.Master's scans should be proof enough
bangin

Originally posted by xJLxKing
bangin
What do you disagree with?

Originally posted by galactusischere
Mr.Master's scans should be proof enough

I am missing something. You are saying the scans should be proof but he puts stuff under the scan that isn't the scan. Like he says that Roma says eternity is the omniverse. The scan doesn't say that. Soooooo.............

Originally posted by quanchi112
What do you disagree with?

Obviously, it's what I quoted

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Obviously, it's what I quoted
Which part of Master's argument? How can't you follow along?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Which part of Master's argument? How can't you follow along?

I DON'T AGREE WITH WHAT galactusischere said. What don't you understand!!!

Originally posted by xJLxKing
I DON'T AGREE WITH WHAT galactusischere said. What don't you understand!!!
Yes, which stated mr. master's scans should be proof enough. Again, what do you disagree with about his argument/scans?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Which part of Master's argument? How can't you follow along?
More importantly, how can you follow along? uhuh

Nah, j/k...

... it's not important if you can follow along or not. peaches

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Whether or not the CA is multiversal isn't in question. CA Supes was outside of the Multiverse, that's something that IG has never done. That's something that is usually reserved for Omnipotents or 4th Wall joke characters.
That's actually what I meant originally. I mistakenly used "is in question" rather than "isn't in question."

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, which stated mr. master's scans should be proof enough. Again, what do you disagree with about his argument/scans?
blow
If the debate is going, obviously, it did not end especially when the majority of the people are on the opposite side.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
More importantly, how can you follow along? uhuh

Nah, j/k...

... it's not important if you can follow along or not. peaches That's actually what I meant originally. I mistakenly used "is in question" rather than "isn't in question."

Jlxxking makes a post and then five minutes later he's confused about the meaning of his own post. He will frequently say he never said that for him to have said it 15 mins ago.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
blow
If the debate is going, obviously, it did not end especially when the majority of the people are on the opposite side.
People are stubborn. So, you are saying you don't disagree with his argument? Mr. Master's?

Originally posted by quanchi112

People are stubborn. So, you are saying you don't disagree with his argument? Mr. Master's?

Are you stupid? Really?
I said I don't agree with Galactusishere because the argument never ended. He stated that it should be enough when the argument is still on. The other side has provided their proof which you can't seem to respond to. Typical

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Are you stupid? Really?
I said I don't agree with Galactusishere because the argument never ended. He stated that it should be enough when the argument is still on. The other side has provided their proof which you can't seem to respond to. Typical
Which proof have they provided that was substantial iyo? The reason debates don't die is because of stubborn people. It's common sense.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Which proof have they provided that was substantial iyo? The reason debates don't die is because of stubborn people. It's common sense.

Read ODG's argument. His entire argument pretty much attacks what Mr. Master states.

Btw, he is the only actually trying to prove anything