Originally posted by OneDumbG0Galactus was also in the story as was reed. Just because a feat happened years later don't act like it would have meant a difference against the ig. The ig can stop it, see their action before it happens, etc. The ig always wins against the un because of its versatility.
^ Get it straight. Magus w/ incomplete IG > Quasar w/ UN.And no. That doesn't make it multiversal. Not even in the slightest.
Originally posted by xJLxKingYou don't seem to get that the Spectre isn't as powerful or capable of that the ig is capable of.
Ig has the feats to back it up. Though, the amount of statement, the point of the story helps Mandrakks, and Superman's case.In this case, I give this to CA.
IF a weak version of Mandrakk was able to easily own Spectre and Radiant, I don't want to see what the real can do. And that's not even equal to what CA Superman is.
Originally posted by ZeuodinThe ca adapted to Mandrakk's powers not the ig or the heart. Eternal power vs. the ability to control space, time, soul,power, reality, and the mind isn't even close by what Mandrakk accomplished in his story.
What did the heart do that the CA will not adapt to?
Originally posted by ZeuodinThat's its best feat? LOL.
The IG never showed the Ability to do anything like that. It's best feat was turning a fumbling Quasar into nothing when he was trying to use the UN.
Originally posted by Omega VisionWhat? The ca was made to stop Mandrakk not something like the ig. They fight in the same battlefield.
The realm that Superman was in when he was in the Cosmic Armor was beyond the Multiverse, it was beyond space and time. Superman may not even notice Thanos' pathetic attempts to attack him.
Originally posted by ZeuodinIn an actual story the ig has always been better. The un had one feat way after the fact that have people mistakenly assume it's somehow better than the ig.
the UN has always been > The IG by actual feats.
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeThe armor was made to stop Mandrakk not the ig. Mandrakk doesn't have the abilities the ig does nor will he ever.
By instantly adapting, instantly is the word, adapting to any threat the other.You said the ig would seperate Supes from the CA. This is an threat it would adapt instantly to and prevent it 😐.
Hm. Someone would use the HOTU against Thanos with the IG. Who would win? Could Thanos seperate the Wielder from the HOTU?
Thanos with the IG vs Thanos with the HOTU. Who would win? 😂
The CA could probably adapt even to the powers of the HOTU. Which doesn't mean that it would win. Stalemate as both are the greatest devices both companies built.
Ig wins any which way.
You don't seem to get that the Spectre isn't as powerful or capable of that the ig is capable of.
A powerful Mandrakk wouldn't even notice them.
The armor was made to stop Mandrakk not the ig. Mandrakk doesn't have the abilities the ig does nor will he ever. Ig wins any which way.
Originally posted by xJLxKingWhich again has nothing to do with the ig.
Maybe, but Spectre and Radiant<a weak MandrakkA powerful Mandrakk wouldn't even notice them.
No, it wasn't. The CA was created to stop the ultimate thread. IT turned out to be Mandrakk
Again, Superman traded blows, held onto a cliff, and didn't show me anything to the point that he could defend himself against the ig's capabilities.
Originally posted by xJLxKingThen tell me what seals the deal. I don't think you have a clue what you are talking about. You just chime in and try to siphon off other people's arguments and when I ask you a question you have no idea what to say but reread the thread. You can't even quote the points you agree with.
You're in denial
I think Mr. Master also stated that
Originally posted by quanchi112
Then tell me what seals the deal. I don't think you have a clue what you are talking about. You just chime in and try to siphon off other people's arguments and when I ask you a question you have no idea what to say but reread the thread. You can't even quote the points you agree with.
Originally posted by xJLxKingLike clockwork. Quote the person who won this debate. Then I can at least argue against a point other than you just cheerleading other people's arguments without understanding the argument itself.
Funny, I am the first guy who responded to his statement. Then again, you can't possible know that since you probably didn't read the thread