Infinity Gauntlet Vs. Cosmic Armor

Started by KuRuPT Thanosi91 pages
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
When you start spewing the exact same ad hominem puke as other posters and attempting to bolster your logic because you feel it necessary to project your personal thoughts/unhealthy attachment towards the IG onto me, then yes, you're a sock. At best, a parrot. Take this opportunity I've given you wholeheartedly as if it's any validation towards your position, because it's the last leg you have to stand on.

False its all YOU can do in this situation. I've turned your fallacies back onto you with numerous comic book examples. I've shown your premises to be faulty with numerous examples. Trust me, me not engaging further after you call me a sock is all the proof I need. You don't like anybody contradicting you and especially someone who has made valid points. Points that call into question your points. People have seen it and objective people at that. You then resort to calling me a sock. Cool. As I said, no need to go further in the discussion. I thought it was enjoyable and both parties brought up good arguments. Both sides could be logically and reasonable. However, once you go there, that is all the proof I need.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
68 pages is a small debate
I've seen Ds and Thanos threads hit 90 some pages in a week's time. Why is it you don't respond to points but just make silly little comments about what I think is a big thread when this a topic I'd like to debate.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I've seen Ds and Thanos threads hit 90 some pages in a week's time. Why is it you don't respond to points but just make silly little comments about what I think is a big thread when this a topic I'd like to debate.

So I guess the comments now are silly

Originally posted by xJLxKing
So I guess the comments now are silly
You pick one thing at random to respond to and it was my opinion over what constitutes a big debate. 😐

Originally posted by quanchi112
You pick one thing at random to respond to and it was my opinion over what constitutes a big debate. 😐
I'm glad you're not so stupid anymore. No offense.

Nvr used to do that too. I think you used to too. H1 does it. A lot of people do.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
False its all YOU can do in this situation. I've turned your fallacies back onto you with numerous comic book examples. I've shown your premises to be faulty with numerous examples. Trust me, me not engaging further after you call me a sock is all the proof I need. You don't like anybody contradicting you and especially someone who has made valid points. Points that call into question your points. People have seen it and objective people at that. You then resort to calling me a sock. Cool. As I said, no need to go further in the discussion. I thought it was enjoyable and both parties brought up good arguments. Both sides could be logically and reasonable. However, once you go there, that is all the proof I need.
Irony, defined. As I countered every single one of your points. You repeat/insert other people's ad hominem garbage like "your beloved UN" into your debate with me and expect me to be magnanimous about it? Give it a rest, sock. Posture and pretend however much you like, as if my retort to that crap somehow turned that crap into argumentative gold or banished my punctuated rebuttals into some ethereal void. But I do encourage you to take it, convenient enough an excuse as it is, because we all know that your argument boils down to this:

Somehow... someway... destroying/recreating a multiverse < taking over a single universe.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Irony, defined. As I countered every single one of your points. You repeat/insert other people's ad hominem garbage like "your beloved UN" into your debate with me and expect me to be magnanimous about it? Give it a rest, sock. Posture and pretend however much you like, as if my retort to that crap somehow turned that crap into argumentative gold or banished my punctuated rebuttals into some ethereal void. But I do encourage you to take it, convenient enough an excuse as it is, because we all know that your argument boils down to this:

Somehow... someway... destroying/recreating a multiverse < taking over a single universe.

Problem is you haven't countered my arguments with anything other than your usual drivel. In fact, your the one who brought into the discussion a negative proof fallacy and yet tried to shift that to others lol. In fact, you further used red herring after red herring over and over again. People would say we're not saying that at all, yet you would turn around and repeat it again. What is even funnier, is what you would repeat was your twisted version of what somebody said that seemed on the surface to be silly IF that was what was said. However, it wasn't and just made you look silly. Listen you can blame starlin for the UN being pwned with but a thought. You just can't get over that fact. Your multiversal weapon, got manipulated with the greatest of ease. In your mind by only a universal weapon.. in my mind at the minimum a multi-universal weapon. One v one encounters count for more than your one feat means superiority fallacy. I trashed how you define superiority and showed that your only using one aspect to define superior. I trashed you one feat means your superior fallacy with example after example. Yes, when somebody trashes somebody's premise and conclusion they get upset just like you have. Its cool, no worries man. Next time try and define superior a little better, and next time don't use ONE feat in ONE area to define superiority. You do that and I won't have to correct your illogical thinking again.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Problem is you haven't countered my arguments with anything other than your usual drivel.
That "drivel" has shut down every single one of your desperate comments which pretend to be arguments.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
In fact, your the one who brought into the discussion a negative proof fallacy and yet tried to shift that to others lol.
By illustration to show you how negative proof fallacies work and why they aren't logic and why they're damn stupid.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
In fact, you further used red herring after red herring over and over again. People would say we're not saying that at all, yet you would turn around and repeat it again. What is even funnier, is what you would repeat was your twisted version of what somebody said that seemed on the surface to be silly IF that was what was said. However, it wasn't and just made you look silly.
Red herring presumes I'm trying to deflect from the core of the matter. The core of the matter is that UN is more powerful than IG as proven on-panel. This entire time I've been countering your use of red herring arguments to detract from the simple truth of this. Stop projecting yourself onto me. That's what red herring is, and you've tried throwing every single one at the sea at me in the vain that nobody will just look at this comparison:

UN instantly destroys/recreates Marvel Multiverse > IG taking over single 616 universe.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Listen you can blame starlin for the UN being pwned with but a thought. You just can't get over that fact. Your multiversal weapon, got manipulated with the greatest of ease. In your mind by only a universal weapon.. in my mind at the minimum a multi-universal weapon.
Who the hell cares? Nobody thinks Dr. Doom is more powerful than Silver Surfer for manipulating his powers with the greatest of ease. Nobody thinks Black Alice is more powerful than Spectre for manipulating his powers with the greatest of ease. Another red herring on your part to avoid the simple on-panel evidence. A multi-universal weapon =/= multiversal weapon. Get over it. Destroying one star at a time with star-destroying power doesn't grant you some sort of quasi-galaxy-busting power. Your continued desperation to twist a term around in spite of this is yet, another red herring on your part to avoid the simple on-panel evidence.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
One v one encounters count for more than your one feat means superiority fallacy.
BWAHAHAHAHA. Guess Maelstrom is more powerful than the IG, lulz.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
I trashed how you define superiority and showed that your only using one aspect to define superior. I trashed you one feat means your superior fallacy with example after example. Yes, when somebody trashes somebody's premise and conclusion they get upset just like you have. Its cool, no worries man. Next time try and define superior a little better, and next time don't use ONE feat in ONE area to define superiority. You do that and I won't have to correct your illogical thinking again.
Quiet, sock.

This thread is way too ****ing big.

^ That's what she said.

Nvr?

^ That's also unfortunately what she said. 🙁

If you guys decide to have a Battlezone match of the Cosmic Armor vs. IG or IG Vs. UN, I'd be willing to judge it. Just let me know.

Infinity Gauntlet Vs. Cosmic Armor

A mod is hopefully going to merge the two threads.

I don't understand what went through your mind as you made this thread.

^Maybe he hoped that the most annoying users will create as many sock accounts as possible to win this poll, so they don't have the time to post here. Though now that you and I posted it seems he failed. 🙁

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
^Maybe he hoped that the most annoying users will create as many sock accounts as possible to win this poll, so they don't have the time to post here. Though now that you and I posted it seems he failed. 🙁

I just have an opinion that the IG wins, just like u when u say that WF Mxy was equal to the Beyonder... So I told Pr to turn this into a poll.

Originally posted by galactusischere
I just have an opinion that the IG wins, just like u when u say that WF Mxy was equal to the Beyonder... So I told Pr to turn this into a poll.

Good, for a sec i though you want to get rid of me. cry2

Vote people!

Mmm probably the Cosmic Armor