Infinity Gauntlet Vs. Cosmic Armor

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ We still love you. Good job. Another instance where you admit commenting on stuff without reading what we're discussing and/or not having the slightest clue what's going on.

Already did. Still waiting for your "pwnzorz deconstruction" now that Juntai educated you on the "Reed's gun > LT" canonicity issue. But if it ain't goin anywhere, it ain't goin anywhere. *shrugs*

I guess you refuse to answer the question.

How did LT and Galactus get into this?

^ Clearly your fault for making this thread in the first place. peaches

Originally posted by quanchi112
I stated this earlier that I trusted mr. m's opinion more so than yours. This is just restating what I said a page or so back.

I guess you refuse to answer the question.

I guess you conveniently ignored where I answered the question. I'll take your inability to proceed with an affirmative deconstruction as an admission of its non-viability. Sorry to have short-circuited it with Last Planet Standing. I'm sure it would have been a doozy. *shrugs*

Are you people honestly still arguing this?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Clearly your fault for making this thread in the first place. peaches And I have always trusted your penchant for backing the incorrect position on certain issues.

I guess you conveniently ignored where I answered the question. I'll take your inability to proceed with an affirmative deconstruction as an admission of its non-viability. Sorry to have short-circuited it with Last Planet Standing. I'm sure it would have been a doozy. *shrugs*

Concession happily accepted.

^ Nothng to get over. It's gratifying that you'd disagree with me. You disagreeing with me presumes a near 99% chance that I'm correct. 😂

By happy in your delusions my friend and also be happy that you didn't have to engage in any sort of inane attempt at an affirmative deconstruction, for which you likely would have been torn a new hole.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Nothng to get over. It's gratifying that you'd disagree with me. You disagreeing with me presumes a near 99% chance that I'm correct. 😂

By happy in your delusions my friend and also be happy that you didn't have to engage in any sort of affirmative deconstruction, for which you likely would have been torn a new hole.

Answer the question so we may proceed.

^ hysterical

Already did, schmuck. Proceed.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ hysterical

Already did, schmuck. Proceed.

Go ahead. I dare you.

^ Wow. Must be the fifteenth time I've answered that. Once again and slowly for you: The answer is the same as "Was MC2 Reed's gun universal in power or was it multiversal?"

I don't even need to dare you. I couldn't care less if you're going to go into some pointless diatribe that further exposes your double-standards. Spent 70+ pages revealing how "Maelstrom vs. IG Thanos" destroyed your "Magus vs. Quasar" rationale. What's another 70+ pages?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Wow. Must be the fifteenth time I've answered that. Once again and slowly for you: The answer is the same as "Was MC2 Reed's gun universal in power or was it multiversal?"

I don't even need to dare you. I couldn't care less if you're going to go into some pointless diatribe that further exposes your double-standards. Spent 70+ pages revealing how "Maelstrom vs. IG Thanos" destroyed your "Magus vs. Quasar" rationale. What's another 70+ pages?

I destroyed your feeble Maelstrom remarks as an angry blast doesn't really phase the abstracts. You acting like it should have killed him is ignoring the ig story altogether.

Thanos thought he had obliterated maelstrom with that blast.
He was actually worried at the fact that it didn't destroy him
mephisto assured thanos that the blast must have destroyed maelstrom
but you clearly see maelstrom still standing there...

Doesn't seem like just an "angry blast" to me
thanos with his angry blasts wiped out celestials.

Thanos was just too evenly matched against maelstrom who at that point had his own mutant power... Amplified by the quantam bands and his status as the anomoly and the backing of oblivion...

Originally posted by rotiart
Thanos thought he had obliterated maelstrom with that blast.
He was actually worried at the fact that it didn't destroy him
mephisto assured thanos that the blast must have destroyed maelstrom
but you clearly see maelstrom still standing there...

Doesn't seem like just an "angry blast" to me
thanos with his angry blasts wiped out celestials.

Thanos was just too evenly matched against maelstrom who at that point had his own mutant power... Amplified by the quantam bands and his status as the anomoly and the backing of oblivion...

I don't remember Thanos destroying the Celestials. I remember him destroying planets they were sending his way.

Not at all. Thanos would have destroyed Maelstrom had they actually had it out. Maelstrom wasn't even at Oblivion level at that point.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That's not answering my question that's asking one of your own.

I destroyed your feeble Maelstrom remarks as an angry blast doesn't really phase the abstracts. You acting like it should have killed him is ignoring the ig story altogether.

Haha, no. Seriously, dude. Do I have to explain it again? Fine... just follow: The whole point of bringing up "Maelstrom vs IG Thanos" was not to campaign for any idea that Maelstrom was greater than IG. That idea is stupidity, because IG has far greater feats than Maelstrom on-panel, damn whatever the handbooks say. But I brought it up, knowing your gut reaction to it would be to attack it viciously since it involved the IG and Thanos. And you did by pointing out (i) how the IG has greater feats, (ii) that blast was hardly the best that the IG could do, and (iii) that Thanos had not fully grasped the IG's potential at the time. You didn't realize (and apparently still don't realize) that those same arguments wholly applied to "Magus vs Quasar," i.e., (i) the UN has greater feats, (ii) that blast was hardly the best the UN could do, and (iii) Quasar had not fully grasped the UN's potential at the time.

You'll never accede to any position that isn't your own or supports your own. You'll even switch positions in the very same thread. You'll rarely give up one inch on any point despite it being utterly clear that you're wrong. But I'll not begrudge you your tenacity, utterly misplaced as it is. Instead, I used it. And so, instead of proving to you that "Magus vs. Quasar" was utter garbage. I let you furiously prove it yourself by illustrating the flaw in your rationale when you tried to have it both ways. A double-standard. I tried to be subtle about it.

But now, since I'm not going to be subtle about it anymore, I am going to state out-loud: I already perceive the double-standard in your arguments concerning THOTU and MC2 Reed's gun. So I simply won't waste 50+ pages is a spurious, back and forth, only to subtly lead you into proving yourself wrong again. I'm just going to do it straight up, right here, right now. You can proceed with whatever argumentation you want on THOTU. As long as you use your own answer concerning MC2 Reed's gun.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
It is an answer. It may not be the answer you want because it will expose your double-standards from the start. But it's there in black and white, nonetheless. The answer to your question is the answer to this question: "Was MC2 Reed's gun multiversal or universal?"

Haha, no. Seriously, dude. Do I have to explain it again? Fine... just follow: The whole point of bringing up "Maelstrom vs IG Thanos" was not to campaign for any idea that Maelstrom was greater than IG. That idea is stupidity, because IG has far greater feats than Maelstrom on-panel, damn whatever the handbooks say. But I brought it up, knowing your gut reaction to it would be to attack it viciously since it involved the IG and Thanos. And you did by pointing out [b](i) how the IG has greater feats, (ii) that blast was hardly the best that the IG could do, and (iii) that Thanos had not fully grasped the IG's potential at the time. You didn't realize (and apparently still don't realize) that those same arguments wholly applied to "Magus vs Quasar," i.e., (i) the UN has greater feats, (ii) that blast was hardly the best the UN could do, and (iii) Quasar had not fully grasped the UN's potential at the time.

You'll never accede to any position that isn't your own or supports your own. You'll even switch positions in the very same thread. You'll rarely give up one inch on any point despite it being utterly clear that you're wrong. But I'll not begrudge you your tenacity, utterly misplaced as it is. Instead, I used it. And so, instead of proving to you that "Magus vs. Quasar" was utter garbage. I let you furiously prove it yourself by illustrating the flaw in your rationale when you tried to have it both ways. A double-standard. I tried to be subtle about it.

But now, since I'm not going to be subtle about it anymore, I am going to state out-loud: I already perceive the double-standard in your arguments concerning THOTU and MC2 Reed's gun. So I simply won't waste 50+ pages is a spurious, back and forth, only to subtly lead you into proving yourself wrong again. I'm just going to do it straight up, right here, right now. You can proceed with whatever argumentation you want on THOTU. As long as you use your own answer concerning MC2 Reed's gun. [/B]

No, false. We have compared these two plot devices in the same story and power wise the ig is the more powerful of the two. No ig user ever tried to wipe the universe out anyways. we saw it easily blink out half the population so your reasoning is faulty and onesided.

I got your point way back when but the ig has compete mastery of power which completely tears apart your logic. The un exists in the 616 universe so it's easy to assume the complete ig is more powerful considering where it came from and the abilities of all the gems.

I never read that story. You've known this for pages now so asking me about something I never read to prove a point is moronic.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, it does. If you read the infinity watch you'd realize warlock freaks out as well with eternity noting the blasts effects would have been nonexistent had they been locked in battle.

I don't remember Thanos destroying the Celestials. I remember him destroying planets they were sending his way.

Not at all. Thanos would have destroyed Maelstrom had they actually had it out. Maelstrom wasn't even at Oblivion level at that point.

Infinity watch referred to the fact that they were in the room of manifestation and thanos didn't have the power to destroy him there

I provided the scan page back...

Sorry I can't edit posts on the iPhone

he had no power because eternity was just a visualization in the room and not actually eternity

And it's way back not a page back

Originally posted by rotiart
Infinity watch referred to the fact that they were in the room of manifestation and thanos didn't have the power to destroy him there

I provided the scan page back...

Originally posted by rotiart
Sorry I can't edit posts on the iPhone

he had no power because eternity was just a visualization in the room and not actually eternity

And it's way back not a page back

Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't read the story you half wit. Why you keep asking me about the details about some story I never read as some kind of half assed answer is one of the stupidest things I have ever read.

No, false. We have compared these two plot devices in the same story and power wise the ig is the more powerful of the two. No ig user ever tried to wipe the universe out anyways. we saw it easily blink out half the population so your reasoning is faulty and onesided.

Negative proof fallacy. You lose. K.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I got your point way back when but the ig has compete mastery of power which completely tears apart your logic. The un exists in the 616 universe so it's easy to assume the complete ig is more powerful considering where it came from and the abilities of all the gems.

I never read that story. You've known this for pages now so asking me about something I never read to prove a point is moronic.

Then go read it and don't waste our time.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
You'll need to then. Please edumacate yourself.

Negative proof fallacy. You lose. K. It doesn't have complete mastery. That no limit fallacy was already dispelled. The IG's power and abilities still pale in comparison to the UN's demonstrated power.

Then go read it and don't waste our time.

What limits does it have then? I must have missed it?

You won't answer my question. Kurupt has you and so do I.