Infinity Gauntlet Vs. Cosmic Armor

Started by galactusischere91 pages
Originally posted by Batman-Prime
That both are weaker then the CA, I think. 😖hifty:

Actually a the stronger/smarter the UN wielder is, the more damage the UN will do when used by that particular person/being. So if a multi-verse was erased and restarted in a blink of an eye in the hands of a mortal, imagine what someone like Living Tribunal or Galactus would be able to do.

Originally posted by Galan007
The 'Alternate Universe' handbook came out in 2005. "Last Planet Standing" wasn't released until 2006. So obviously it's not going to be mentioned.

LT's bio was in the #6 issue of the OHOTMU, which was released in June of 2006. "LPS" wasn't released until July 2006. So obviously it's not going to be mentioned in there either.

However, the simple fact that the MC2 universe was mentioned in a handbook as a 100% canon Marvel Universe, should be more than enough to say that all MC2 stories are canon as well. We can't pick and choose which stories we like and which ones we don't, after all.

👆

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Sorry if I had to continually dispel your nonsensical excuses when it comes to you talking out of your a$$.

Power which stretches and reaches into the multiverse =/= power that instantly destroys/recreates/manipulates the multiverse.

And I gave you the answer. Assume my answer for me. This time I'm inviting you. And then proceed to explain why you think you're so clever.

Doesn't surprise me that you never read Last Planet Standing.

That's not true at all.

I guess in a story if a writer refuses to mention the word multiverse then all the weight the showing carries goes out the window since you automatically ASSUME multiverse>universal powers.

Another nerdlike response from you. No, I haven't been reading comics my entire life and had only gotten back into them after a 10 plus year hiatus to only get back into them a few years back.

I trust mr. m's opinion on what is canon for the most part over yours.

^ That what's you say. I don't agree.

I automatically assume that instantly destroying/recreating/manipulating the multiverse >>>>>> taking over the single 616 universe.

When did I ever accuse you of not reading comics? I just asked you to go ahead with your awesome argument that utterly destroys mine by assuming the answer to the question you posed. I'm still inviting you to.

You're free to trust those who are wrong. By all means.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ That what's you say. I don't agree.

I automatically assume that instantly destroying/recreating/manipulating the multiverse >>>>>> taking over the single 616 universe.

When did I ever accuse you of not reading comics? I just asked you to go ahead with your awesome argument that utterly destroys mine by assuming the answer to the question you posed. I'm still inviting you to.

You're free to trust those who are wrong. By all means.

I disagree with you.

Your nerdlike response was when you said I know you didn't read blah blee blah blee blah like you're the man or something.

I bet you've been reading comics for years.

Now back to my point. Was the heart universal or multiversal? Did it's power only affect the universe they were in?

^ Hence the continuing dialogue. Next time, think about what you type before typing it.

But you didn't. So why would you even act like you could comment on its applicability or not? Sorry, but talking your out of your a$$ on stuff you haven't read is simply talking out of your a$$.

I have been reading comics for years.

Once again back to my answer: "The answer is the same as whether MC2 Reed's gun that beat LT was universal or multiversal." Go ahead and assume what the answer is. Proceed from there. I've always have, and am still, inviting you to.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Hence the continuing dialogue. Next time, think about what you type before typing it.

But you didn't. So why would you even act like you could comment on its applicability or not? Sorry, but talking your out of your a$$ on stuff you haven't read is simply talking out of your a$$.

I have been reading comics for years.

Once again back to my answer: "The answer is the same as whether MC2 Reed's gun that beat LT was universal or multiversal." Go ahead and assume what the answer is. Proceed from there. I've always have, and am still, inviting you to.

I said it figures he would do so because you can't prove it and mr. m called you on it. That's all I said.

So this new tactic of yours is to answer my question with a question of your own?

Do you feel the un is more powerful than the heart?

^ Called me on what? That he was wrong about Last Planet Standing being not canon?

No. I'm trying to make it easier for you, by granting you whatever answer you like with the context that "MC2 Reed's gun beat LT also." So by all means, this is the fifth/sixth time I've asked you to put a word into my mouth and proceed with what you think will be a deconstruction of my argument.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Called me on what? That he was wrong about Last Planet Standing being not canon?

No. I'm trying to make it easier for you, by granting you whatever answer you like with the context that "MC2 Reed's gun beat LT also." So by all means, this is the fifth/sixth time I've asked you to put a word into my mouth and proceed with what you think will be a deconstruction of my argument.

You haven't proven so.

I'd like to hear your stance first. I don't want to be rude.

^ It was proven. By being published under the MC2 imprint. And seriously, you can go suck a toilet for asserting otherwise.

As opposed to all the other times? I've already invited you seven/eight times. By all means: Assume the answer, and then proceed with your deconstruction.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ It was proven. By being published under the MC2 imprint. And seriously, you can go suck a toilet for asserting otherwise.

As opposed to all the other times? I've already invited you seven/eight times. By all means: Assume the answer, and then proceed with your deconstruction.

So that proves it?

Why are you cowering away from my question? Just be A MAN and answer it already.

I have no idea what this argument is about, but I'm loving the overt dickishness from both sides. 👆

^ Mission accomplished! usaflag

Originally posted by quanchi112
So that proves it?

Why are you cowering away from my question? Just be A MAN and answer it already.

Yes. As something being published = being canon.

MAN says: Whatever answer you want. Go forth my son, and conquer all! crackers

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Mission accomplished! usaflag Yes. As something being published = being canon.

MAN says: Whatever answer you want. Go forth my son, and conquer all! crackers

So all what if's are canon?

Until you answer my question you have been fleeing in terror from you're just a boy.

^ It wasn't a What If? It was the MC2 alternate universe. Although, same concept. Alternate universe. And LT is the same across all alternate universes. Hence, canon to LT.

So deconstruct the "boy's" arguments. Assume an answer. We wait with baited breath and eager anticipation!

😂 This has got to be the longest thread ever!

*edit* Next to the Superman vs Thanos.

Just waiting for ODG to tell Quan to suck a toilet again 🙂

Originally posted by kevdude
😂 This has got to be the longest thread ever!
^ Not yet! Doesn't match up to Thanos with IG vs White Crown Phoenix !!! peaches

EDIT: !!!!!!! Actually, we surpassed it!!!! Woooooo!!!!!!!! Somebody break out the bubbly!!!!! It's like New Years all over again!!!!

🙂

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ It wasn't a What If? It was the MC2 alternate universe. Although, same concept. Alternate universe. And LT is the same across all alternate universes. Hence, canon to LT.

So deconstruct the "boy's" arguments. Assume an answer. We wait with baited breath and eager anticipation!

Have a bio which seals the deal?

If you aren't man enough to take a stance then I don't have to do anything. Actually.

Originally posted by kevdude
😂 This has got to be the longest thread ever!

*edit* Next to the Superman vs Thanos.

Not even close.