Originally posted by Batman-PrimeFalse. They are not the same characters so quit acting like King Thor is equal to Mordru when he isn't.
^there is nothing to compare except:
Cap's shield destroyed by the MAGICAL blast of an skyfather < SBP not affected by the MAGICAL blast of Modru (Skyfather too)
Also resisting one blast isn't proof of complete immunity against all types of magic.
Originally posted by Omega VisionWhat? Are you serious?
There isn't much practical difference tbh. If Mordru could only tickle SBP then King Thor won't do much better.
Was that Mordru's best? Do you have any idea what King Thor is capable of?
Originally posted by King KandyAgreed.
I never saw any evidence that SBP was more invulnerable to magic than he is to anything else. He's pretty much invulnerable to most any attack, including magic.
Originally posted by shokosugiActually, he's right.
Wrong.
I know where you want to take the discussion but i'm not willing to play along. Cap's shield was destroyed by an magical blasts, we agree on this. SBP resisted magical attacks better then other attacks (physical for example), we can agree on this too I guess.
Cap's shield is an dead object that doesn't fight back.
SBP is an character who fights back.
Originally posted by xJLxKingSo a Monitor's shields can survive this sort of attack? Do you realize how devoid of logic the stance you are clinging to actually is?
Prime will survive that attack. IF he was able to survive a universe going BOOM! then I don't see why he can't do so with a less powerful attack.
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeHe doesn't have the power to put down King Thor. King Thor is more powerful, thousands of years of experience, and just as durable if not more so.
I know where you want to take the discussion but i'm not willing to play along. Cap's shield was destroyed by an magical blasts, we agree on this. SBP resisted magical attacks better then other attacks (physical for example), we can agree on this too I guess.
Cap's shield is an dead object that doesn't fight back.
SBP is an character who fights back.
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeI wouldn't agree. Yes, Cap's shield is inanimate. And SBP is animate. And this doesn't really matter.
I know where you want to take the discussion but i'm not willing to play along. Cap's shield was destroyed by an magical blasts, we agree on this. SBP resisted magical attacks better then other attacks (physical for example), we can agree on this too I guess.
Cap's shield is an dead object that doesn't fight back.
SBP is an character who fights back.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I wouldn't agree. Yes, Cap's shield is inanimate. And SBP is animate. And this doesn't really matter.
You don't agree that caps shield was destroyed by an magical attack?
You don't agree that SBP's showings against magical attacks are better then his showings against physical attacks?
And it does matter, not to you, but anyway. (waiting for the Captain America's Shield respect Thread)
Originally posted by OneDumbG0Except it isn't. What if in the future Prime takes a full on assault by Spectre and laughs it off? What if that happens in the future instead of him getting hurt? My future prediction is just as good as yours is, isn't it? I'm going to take a firm stance on what has happened so far in comics, though. IE, with Prime never being affected by magic.
^ If we compare what Cap's shield has taken without ill effect and what Superman Prime has taken without ill effect, I'd daresay your conclusions are incorrect.At BlanketNo. This is the crux of the argument. Because you're assuming that magic, of whatever sufficient measure or amplitude, would be utterly useless against Superman Prime. Don't project the "futurity of possibilities" criticism at me when you're the one already assuming that King Thor's attack would be useless. This future result is what I am contending with, by measuring whether your assessment that Superman Prime is utterly "immune" is reliable or not.
So King Thor smacking Superman Prime with Mjolnir would tickle. Ok, second question, "If Juggernaut smacked Superman Prime in the face... would it tickle?"
Only, everybody and their mother knew that Superman was vulnerable to magic, hence... there is a perfectly valid reason why he would say "Magic can't hurt me."
I'm guessing a Juggernaut 'smack' would be less than a King Thor 'smack' with Mjolnir... so, ya.
K. So, 'Magic can't hurt me', now directly goes into Superman's history, instead of the obvious implications of that statement. My writer intention guessing is as good as yours, so I'm going to say that's not what the writer meant at all.
---
The funny thing I find about this argument, is that for someone who was trolling me based off of the direct use of a word sure as hell makes an assload of assumptions. 🙂
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeKT use magic to make that blast, that dont mean the blast itself is magic. its just super strong energy blast
The shield was destroyed by an MAGICAL attack of an Skyfather being
its like saying "Force lightning" lol, its just electricity but the sith use the Force to make it
Originally posted by SoulDevourerTo act like Thor's hammer would just bounce off Prime's face is one of the most hysterical and ignorant stances I have ever heard on this board. Keep in mind we have h1 running lose on here perpetuating lies and half truths.
KT use magic to make that blast, that dont mean the blast itself is magic. its just super strong energy blastits like saying "Force lightning" lol, its just electricity but the sith use the Force to make it