War and Link vs Kratos, Bayonetta and Dante

Originally posted by The Scenario
Eh, there are some indications. I thought the "His power resides within you" line was a good one.

For Wind Waker, the beginning is enough. "You have controlled the winds and crossed the seas, and here, near the end of your quest, the power of the gods has been bestowed upon you."

The difference is that while WW Link had to earn the Triforce piece, TP Link started with it.

Chateau Romani. And yes, assuming he was able to drink it.

Here's the best Magic Cape I can find.

YouTube video

yeh, the "power" (no specifics) of the previous Link ancestor.

The second one is simply titles, "power of gods". A lot of characters in their journeys gain the power of "God". Statements do not equel feats or indication of strength/power. Merely narrative.

Not likely with bullets going everywhere and enemies that can move far faster than Link can think.

Originally posted by Burning thought
Your argument was not an actual argument. It was simply you saying the same thing again (your being a hypocrite again) that I have rebuked so many times.

yes they are, you think mario and Zelda are meant to be really serious games? 🙄 Sorry but there is evidence, all the same evidence you try and use for Links feats combined with the fact you have to prop his statistics up all the time to make an exception, take way [b]your exceptions (not the games, your fanfictions) and we have a close to toonforce feat. [/B]

I predicted every word of this worthless pile of crap that some stupid Brit calls a post.

You might realize that the Zelda games are serious if you had played them. But you haven't so your stupidity shines once again.

Now again, dumbass, I bid thee good day.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
I predicted every word of this worthless pile of crap that some stupid Brit calls a post.

You might realize that the Zelda games are serious if you had played them. But you haven't so your stupidity shines once again.

Now again, dumbass, I bid thee good day.

maybe your right, I have not had the pleasure of tripping 200 tonnes with little boots of iron as my little 50kg body stands unharmed, or enjoy links cute little spectrum of colours as a rainbow saves me from majoras dissolving moon face.

Although I think its more likely your just making statements again, I bet later youll call "this" an argument... 🙄

MooCow, you were just warned about that sort of behaviour yesterday.

If I see it again, you will be serving a temp ban.

I advise you stop it, now.

BT, if you want to try and debate, at least know what you're talking about.

Originally posted by Peach

BT, if you want to try and debate, at least know what you're talking about.

Thing is i do, I am watching it from their own sources unless ofc you think their sources are false and made in flash or 3d studo max? I am bored, maybe you can debate this better than they?

Originally posted by Burning thought
Thing is i do, I am watching it from their own sources unless ofc you think their sources are false and made in flash or 3d studo max? I am bored, maybe you can debate this better than they?

You've admitted before that you've never really played Zelda, yes? So then why try and debate it when you don't know anything about it?

Because reading synopses on wiki and watching a few youtube videos isn't going to give you any sort of comprehensive knowledge about it.

I don't have any interest in participating in fanboy arguments.

Originally posted by Burning thought
maybe your right, I have not had the pleasure of tripping 200 tonnes with little boots of iron as my little 50kg body stands unharmed, or enjoy links cute little spectrum of colours as a rainbow saves me from majoras dissolving moon face.

Although I think its more likely your just making statements again, I bet later youll call "this" an argument... 🙄

Saw this one coming too. That rainbow is abnormally special to you, isn't it?

Technically this is an argument, but in a different sense of the word. You might not know that though, you don't know what hyperbole is.

ONCE AGAIN, SIR, I BID THEE GOOD DAY!

Originally posted by Sin_Volvagia
You do realize Bayonetta's pistols are enhanced with magic, right? Of course not, you barely even know what kind of character she is.

Lol?
That's exactly what makes it so useless.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Saw this one coming too. That rainbow is abnormally special to you, isn't it?

Technically this is an argument, but in a different sense of the word. You might not know that though, you don't know what hyperbole is.

ONCE AGAIN, SIR, I BID THEE GOOD DAY!

Its one of those toon moments that cannot be ignored.

No its just a rant full of flaming, not a real debating argument.

Originally posted by Peach
You've admitted before that you've never really played Zelda, yes? So then why try and debate it when you don't know anything about it?

Because reading synopses on wiki and watching a few youtube videos isn't going to give you any sort of comprehensive knowledge about it.

I don't have any interest in participating in fanboy arguments.

"knowing nothing about it" is a bit of a exaggeration. I know plenty about it, from vids and wikis combined. The youtube vids are of the gameplay and the argument is based around specific bits and piecies not the whole game in full.

besides playing the game seems to not make much of a difference, there are plenty here who have played it who agree Link is being "overhyped" by his fanboys.

Note that those people are called FF fanboys...

I did not know Sin was a FF fanboy, I thought he was against them? and Odinwrath? he was a new member and he claims to play it. And although Scenario is debating for Link, he is using feats, facts and information from the games, not flawed opinions based on things not stated in-game.

Originally posted by Burning thought
Its one of those toon moments that cannot be ignored.

No its just a rant full of flaming, not a real debating argument.

Except for the fact that the rainbow didn't do anything at all. You might know that if you had played the game, or were intelligent.

This is you disagreeing with me, and me disagreeing with you, and so on and so forth. An argument in a different sense of the word than you are used to. But you're British, I can't expect you to know that.

Seriously, OoT is ten dollars on the VC. That's like three bottles of good toothpaste. You don't use toothpaste, I'm certain you have the money.

There's probably dozens of emulators for it too, as well as video walk throughs and LP's. But I suppose you can't get the full experience of the game, it would destroy your toonforce idea.

OoT is considered the best game in existance to a lot of people.
For example, Game Informer rated it as the best game of all time

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Except for the fact that the rainbow didn't do anything at all. You might know that if you had played the game, or were intelligent.

This is you disagreeing with me, and me disagreeing with you, and so on and so forth. An argument in a different sense of the word than you are used to. But you're British, I can't expect you to know that.

Seriously, OoT is ten dollars on the VC. That's like three bottles of good toothpaste. You don't use toothpaste, I'm certain you have the money.

There's probably dozens of emulators for it too, as well as video walk throughs and LP's. But I suppose you can't get the full experience of the game, it would destroy your toonforce idea.

I am sorry but it did appear to save Link from the moon. Link did not just jump from it. The rainbow was still there regardless.

When I call something an argument I am refering to a well throught out debating argument with sources and facts, the kind I usually make to reply to the type of argument you usually make. Which is pretty much just "no itz not! (add flaming here).

Why would I play it when it seems other people who do still do not agree with 1000 ton supersonic link? why would I play a whole game when I can see the relevant feats?

I would probably end up seeing so many toonforce elements that I would be able to post pages of evidence for it rather than just the bits you give me.

When did a rainbow save Link?

Originally posted by Burning thought
I am sorry but it did appear to save Link from the moon. Link did not just jump from it. The rainbow was still there regardless.

When I call something an argument I am refering to a well throught out debating argument with sources and facts, the kind I usually make to reply to the type of argument you usually make. Which is pretty much just "no itz not! (add flaming here).

Why would I play it when it seems other people who do still do not agree with 1000 ton supersonic link? why would I play a whole game when I can see the relevant feats?

I would probably end up seeing so many toonforce elements that I would be able to post pages of evidence for it rather than just the bits you give me.

It was thousands of feet in the air, and the end of it didn't touch the ground anywhere near where Link woke up. Not to mention the fact that a Rainbow isn't solid and he couldn't ride down it anyway.

Did I not just say that this is an argument in a different sense of the word than you are used to? Oh wait, I did say that.

Because not playing the game forces upon you the stupid ideas that you have. See examples: toonforce, defying physics, magic slidey rainbow, and most importantly, toonforce.

Of course you might think you do, you're the guy who thinks that OoT has childish graphics after you compared it to a PS3 God of War game. Apparently color = kid friendly. I'm still giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you can be an open minded and decent person, giving OoT a fair chance would show you how ridiculous your toonforce claim really is.

Originally posted by LLLLLink
When did a rainbow save Link?

He thinks the moon turned into a rainbow at the end of Majora's Mask and that Link rode it down to the ground.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
It was thousands of feet in the air, and the end of it didn't touch the ground anywhere near where Link woke up. Not to mention the fact that a Rainbow isn't solid and he couldn't ride down it anyway.

Did I not just say that this is an argument in a different sense of the word than you are used to? Oh wait, I did say that.

Because not playing the game forces upon you the stupid ideas that you have. See examples: toonforce, defying physics, magic slidey rainbow, and most importantly, toonforce.

Of course you might think you do, you're the guy who thinks that OoT has childish graphics after you compared it to a PS3 God of War game. Apparently color = kid friendly. I'm still giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you can be an open minded and decent person, giving OoT a fair chance would show you how ridiculous your toonforce claim really is.

He thinks the moon turned into a rainbow at the end of Majora's Mask and that Link rode it down to the ground.

And yet playing the game seems to have even more strange and terrible consequences on the "lollovelink" club such as: major fanboyism, loss of logic engine, blurring fiction and reality, ignoring physics and 80kg throwing thousands of tonnes.

I am open minded and decent, just not towards raving fans.

We dont even see link once the moon dissolves, the only thing he could have escaped on is that Rainbow.

If we're such an extreme case then why would it have any adverse effects on you?

OoT is not a raving fanboy.

Actually you see him a matter of perhaps 15 seconds later, on the ground right outside the city while the end of the rainbow is far off in the distance. Fact is, there's no way some magic slidey rainbow saved his life. Maybe a giant caught him, maybe he really tanked the moon implosion and survived the crash to the ground, maybe he was just teleported out. You have no idea, I have no idea. The most logical options are the crash to the ground or a captured giant.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
If we're such an extreme case then why would it have any adverse effects on you?

OoT is not a raving fanboy.

Actually you see him a matter of perhaps 15 seconds later, on the ground right outside the city while the end of the rainbow is far off in the distance. Fact is, there's no way some magic slidey rainbow saved his life. Maybe a giant caught him, maybe he really tanked the moon implosion and survived the crash to the ground, maybe he was just teleported out. You have no idea, I have no idea. The most logical options are the crash to the ground or a captured giant.

Ah but I am not argueing with OoT, I am argueing with your assumptions and delusions based around it.

Show me, I just watched the vid and we dont see the rainbows exact end, then it says "a new day" or w/e and we see link unconcious. We don see him when the moon dissolves either.

Its funny how theres "no way" a rainbow saved his life but there is a way a 80kg little man can lift a thousand tonnes. You make exceptions for what you like in the game and claim things illogical when it suits you.

Actually right now you're arguing about nothing. OoT is a good game, millions of people say so. The fact that I am convinced playing it would destroy your toonforce idea for you makes no difference for anything.

Watch it again? You don't have to see the exact end of the rainbow, but you can see enough of it to know that the end of it is nowhere near where Link was found. If I recall correctly, Link just stands up as that scene starts. The giants are in the same spot, Skull Kid doesn't have powers anymore, Tatl and her brother can't lift Link, so nobody went to get him.

The same way you pick and choose which statements from games are hyperbole and which ones aren't right? Link gets an item that gives him the strength to lift that pillar, he doesn't get an item to make light into a solid object.