Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
I have points up right now, you do not. Usually you have to knock mine down and put up points that I can't knock down to win.And that last post of yours was lolz. It was like a lengthier "NOU!"
Lie, you dont have any points. Your just trolling.
No it was just pointing out you dont have any arguments in the first place and Links feats are in conclusion illegitimate.
Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Stop being a child? You just quoted his post and put his name in there for a Fix'd joke.And I have been arguing BT. You're just ignoring it and every single time you make a post you just keep going.
Do you actually believe that I haven't argued anything or are you just trying to troll me?
no your not, your calling statements, silly buggering and relying on fanon and fallible comments an argument, its not.
Nah, you argued early on, not so badly about how I "could" be being bias, but you stopped argueing when I started to gain canon evidence, then you started nit picking and pulling out non credible sources to try and back up ambiguous ideas.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
@BT: As the founder of a prestigious organisation, I find your attempts at condescension a little pretentious. Not only do I have the intellectual high ground, but I'm above your petty remarks. 131You can continue to banter, but realise that no one takes you seriously.
I named the organisation, technically I am the creator then I put you in charge. Intellectual highground? I lold......
baseless statement.
Originally posted by NemeBro
What can War do?
He can transform into a large demon of fire with a big sword, he has few strength feats equel to Kratos (his counter in this fight) but gets a mound, has a scythe, can see spirits and attack them, a big sword etc.
He is able to jump at incredible distances.
Originally posted by Burning thought
no your not, your calling statements, silly buggering and relying on fanon and fallible comments an argument, its not.Nah, you argued early on, not so badly about how I "could" be being bias, but you stopped argueing when I started to gain canon evidence, then you started nit picking and pulling out non credible sources to try and back up ambiguous ideas.
Technically you called for statements. It isn't fanon and I've disproved that it's "fallible." Hell, I asked two questions on the fallible subject which you refused to answer. Likely because you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
Yeah you have a statement, I gave you that numerous times. Too bad your own logic defeats your arguments. If you weren't so inconsistent you might see that.
This is all I'm going to get out of you, I can see. If you want to keep going then go back and seriously respond to something. You could answer those questions on your favorite word, too.