Who fares better off against energy blasts, Thor or Superman?

Durability.

Just based off of pure durability or the ability to avoid/negate them?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Just based off of pure durability or the ability to avoid/negate them?

Pretty much even

I'd say they're pretty much even, too (the diplomatic answer, yeah, but it's accurate lol). I think the composition of the energy blast matters a bit more to Superman than it does to Thor, though. Anything with a specific radiation frequency (see: kryptonite/red sun) or magical in nature effects Superman a little bit more than it would Thor.

Standard energy blasts, though, they're pretty close.

Thor can take energy blasts better.

Superman is better with physical punishment.

They're about equal in telepathy.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Thor can take energy blasts better.

Superman is better with physical punishment.

They're about equal in telepathy.

I think you did it kind of backwards.

Superman>Thor energy blast/Sharpnel

Physical punishment, Thor>Superman.

their about equal for physical

Thor definitly owns for energy attacks

Hmm....

Thor has been known to do badly against bullets.

Originally posted by Giant Cock
Thor has been known to do badly against bullets.

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Stats/ThorDurability23-Projectile315.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Stats/ThorDurability35486Projectile.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Stats/ThorDurability43v304Projectile.jpg

Superman has a few weaknesses that hurt him here, Magic, Red solar energy and kryptonite.

I believe Metallo has blasted him with Kryptonite based energy before

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Stats/ThorDurability23-Projectile315.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Stats/ThorDurability35486Projectile.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Stats/ThorDurability43v304Projectile.jpg

~Bibeasts guys were energy, third not classic thor, he is post JMS and the second wasn't from a planes cannon.

It depends on the blast for me. Thor would look better than Superman against magic based energy blasts, not saying that Superman would get raped by one, but he's more vulnerable to magic. Non-magic based energy attacks could be seen as even to me especially if we're not counting energy blasts composed of his weaknesses like kryptonite and rd sun energy.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Pretty much even

Originally posted by quanchi112
How can it be even when Superman has weaknesses Thor doesn't have. Do you mean it's even against energy attacks that don't take advantage of his weaknesses?

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Yup. I am talking about regular energy blast in general. It's rather stupid to use their advantage in this kind of thread

Regular energy beam: Superman
Magical energy beam: Thor
Kryptonite energy beam: Thor
Anti-Asgardian energy beam: Superman 😛

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's rather stupid to ignore a weakness just to say they are equals.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Whatever man. Take it however you want.