Who fares better off against energy blasts, Thor or Superman?

Started by quanchi1125 pages

Originally posted by Original Smurph
But what if it's a magical, kryptonite fist that radiates red sun energy?!?!?

You're clearly not considering all weaknesses. Listen to Quan, he knows what's up.

Tell him gargamel.
Originally posted by Blanket
It does though, as durability has nothing to do with weaknesses. It has to do with the character's origin.

But like I said, Thor is more durable than Superman because Superman is weak to K-nite.

Great spite thread. 👆

It isn't spite. No one's even fighting here. Some people might disagree anyways.

Some posters even think that magic isn't even a weakness to Superman anyways.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
thor had his ribs broken before
When?
Originally posted by carver9
Quan, its retarded to make a thread like this if you're including a character weakness.
No, it isn't.

It's a spite thread against Superman because Thor will win this thread in a landslide. You like Thor, seemingly hate Superman. Seems likely.

A spite thread doesn't have to be targeted against people fighting.

Anyway, Thor makes Superman look like a rookie here.

Originally posted by Blanket
It's a spite thread against Superman because Thor will win this thread in a landslide. You like Thor, seemingly hate Superman. Seems likely.

A spite thread doesn't have to be targeted against people fighting.

Anyway, Thor makes Superman look like a rookie here.

Well, anyways I see Thor has being better against energy blasts whether they are weakness based or not.

Since you consistently cried over the mediator of all comics being unfair the weaknesses are thrown out here.

Ps. I told you I wasn't biased.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Tell him gargamel. It isn't spite. No one's even fighting here. Some people might disagree anyways.

Some posters even think that magic isn't even a weakness to Superman anyways.

When? No, it isn't.

Yes it is. If you knew you were making this thread about a character that has a weakness why not just use someone like Surfer who doesnt have as many weaknesses. Its pretty obvious if you made a thread the way you just did that Thor would be victorious since he doesnt possess close to the amount of weaknesses Superman have.

Against Sharpnel, Superman>Thor
Bluntforce Trama, Thor>Superman
Energy attacks, about equal but I'll give a small nod to Thor since he has taken blast from celestial, the destroyer, Odin, etc.... and was still awake.

Originally posted by carver9
Yes it is. If you knew you were making this thread about a character that has a weakness why not just use someone like Surfer who doesnt have as many weaknesses. Its pretty obvious if you made a thread the way you just did that Thor would be victorious since he doesnt possess close to the amount of weaknesses Superman have.

Against Sharpnel, Superman>Thor
Bluntforce Trama, Thor>Superman
Energy attacks, about equal but I'll give a small nod to Thor since he has taken blast from celestial, the destroyer, Odin, etc.... and was still awake.

Bran touched my heart through his last tear soaked posts. Thank him.

Weaknesses are ignored in this thread.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Bran touched my heart through his last tear soaked posts. Thank him.

Weaknesses are ignored in this thread.

LOL 😆

Originally posted by quanchi112
Well, anyways I see Thor has being better against energy blasts whether they are weakness based or not.

Since you consistently cried over the mediator of all comics being unfair the weaknesses are thrown out here.

Ps. I told you I wasn't biased.

K. It still doesn't erase your logic in this thread, but the thread is back to what it was seemingly at the start.

Right, not bias at all. You and H1 are the least bias here.

BTW, don't ask so many questions if you don't like the responses that follow.

Originally posted by Blanket
K. It still doesn't erase your logic in this thread, but the thread is back to what it was seemingly at the start.

Right, not bias at all. You and H1 are the least bias here.

BTW, don't ask so many questions if you don't like the responses that follow.

I changed the thread because you moved me. I'm not biased at all actually unlike that cbr machine.

Do you see them as equals here?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I changed the thread because you moved me. I'm not biased at all actually unlike that cbr machine.

Do you see them as equals here?

You, H!, and CBR don't even know the meaning of bias.

Pretty close, actually.

Originally posted by Blanket
You, H!, and CBR don't even know the meaning of bias.

Pretty close, actually.

H 1 doesn't know what the inside of a comic book looks like. I really see him acting out these battles and actually koing imaginary marvel character before he posts.

I sense a hidden (quan)bias preventing you from shouting Thor in this very thread.

Originally posted by quanchi112
H 1 doesn't know what the inside of a comic book looks like. I really see him acting out these battles and actually koing imaginary marvel character before he posts.

I sense a hidden (quan)bias preventing you from shouting Thor in this very thread.

You and h1 have more in common than I thought then.

Truthfully, no. You overrate your range on here.
I've always seen Thor slightly below Supes in strength while they were fairly even in durability. Way before Rage of Olympus came along (when everyone else learned of Thor).
Thor's damage soak helps him a lot, which I believe is higher than Supe's. But on the other hand, it seems more is needed to affect Superman, but when it does, it would do more to him than Thor, if that makes sense.
Like I said, fairly even. Giving either the nod wouldn't be wrong.

Originally posted by Blanket
You and h1 have more in common than I thought then.

Truthfully, no. You overrate your range on here.
I've always seen Thor slightly below Supes in strength while they were fairly even in durability. Way before Rage of Olympus came along (when everyone else learned of Thor).
Thor's damage soak helps him a lot, which I believe is higher than Supe's. But on the other hand, it seems more is needed to affect Superman, but when it does, it would do more to him than Thor, if that makes sense.
Like I said, fairly even. Giving either the nod wouldn't be wrong.

I actually draw diagrams so I've evolved past acting these battles out.

Rage slants Thor a little bit higher than most would though as he's a diehard Thor fan. He won't admit that the Hulk is stronger than Thor when sufficiently angry.

OF Thor's ribs got broken by Bor, which obviously isn't a low showing.

whats most powerful energy blast Supe has survive?

Originally posted by SoulDevourer
whats most powerful energy blast Supe has survive?

The Batglare, I think.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
OF Thor's ribs got broken by Bor, which obviously isn't a low showing.
Superman's had his jaw completely shattered by an equal in Zod to boot.

Normal, standard energy blasts?

Probably even. If i had to pick one, Superman.

Energy blasts...I gotta go with Thor. Being able to come back again and again after taking celestial blasts was pretty amazing for a below skyfather character.

Supes is definately ahead of Thor in terms of taking the first few hits of general damage but slowly seems to become less impervious in tough fights where as Thor seems to get tougher the longer the fight goes on. There's a zillion examples of Thor getting pounded to the ground then getting back up and turning around the fight. But for energy blasts I gotta go with Thor, he seems tailor made to take them and if he uses his hammer then forget it, there's nothing further to talk about in this thread.

Someone should probably make a thread on who can take more celestial energy blasts and keep fighting. If there isn't one already that is.

Bran brings up a good point here.

Thor can take more punishment, but Superman has a higher degree of invulnerability. It takes a bit more to reach the point where you hurt Supes, but once you do he will go down faster than Thor.