Who fares better off against energy blasts, Thor or Superman?

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you agree it favors Thor when we take into consideration everything.

How in the fudge is a durability thread being twisted into a weakness thread?

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Depends what you mean by everything? Does Telepathy count in too?

You said they are equals but against magic,k-nite, red solar energy it's in Thor's favor so how is it equal taking all these things into consideration.

Originally posted by Blanket
How in the fudge is a durability thread being twisted into a weakness thread?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why would telepathy count?

You said they are equals but against magic,k-nite, red solar energy it's in Thor's favor so how is it equal taking all these things into consideration.

This is a durability thread. Not how Thor would do with magic blasts, and manipulation of blasts.

✅

Originally posted by Blanket
Because you don't take those things into consideration. 😐

This is a durability thread. Not how Thor would do with magic blasts, and manipulation of blasts.

You can't just discount a weakness here bran.

So you made a thread talking about just blasts... now you want to include Superman's weaknesses and expect this to be talked about?

Thor is more durable than Superman because magic, K-nite, and red sun energy are Superman's weakness. Even if Superman isn't fighting those things, Thor is still more durable because that's his weaknesses. Logic takes a nosedive.

Originally posted by Blanket
So you made a thread talking about just blasts... now you want to include Superman's weaknesses and expect this to be talked about?

Thor is more durable than Superman because magic, K-nite, and red sun energy are Superman's weakness. Even if Superman isn't fighting those things, Thor is still more durable because that's his weaknesses. Logic takes a nosedive.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Pure durability.

Originally posted by Blanket

Pure durability doesn't include 'circumstances' to where they can be effected only by a certain type of wavelength.

You created a lopsided thread (spite) though, in place of a before acceptable one.

Isn't Thor vulnable to radiation too? (Radioactive Man)

Physical: Superman
Energy attacks: thor
piercing: supes by a mile.

Originally posted by Blanket
Pure durability doesn't include 'circumstances' to where they can be effected only by a certain type of wavelength.

You created a lopsided thread (spite) though, in place of a before acceptable one.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Physical: Superman
Energy attacks: thor
piercing: supes by a mile.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Physical: Superman

You're clearly not considering all weaknesses. Listen to Quan, he knows what's up.

It does though, as durability has nothing to do with weaknesses. It has to do with the character's origin.

But like I said, Thor is more durable than Superman because Superman is weak to K-nite.

Great spite thread. 👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
It also doesn't ignore weaknesses either. You can't have it both ways. I am a little curious. Why do you give Superman the nod in physical attacks? I know this has nothing to do with physical attacks but I want to hear your reasoning.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
thor had his ribs broken before

Dont remember this happening but if it did I can say this, Superman had his Jaw broken before.

Quan, its retarded to make a thread like this if you're including a character weakness.