Ok, so we have footage. What is she doing in the footage? Do we have people that she talked to? Items she may have been carrying, what she was wearing, etc. Can we pull up an accompanying travel record to match the footage and identify a name she was using? Basically I dig for more information. Her arriving in some footage is worthless otherwise.
Alright, so this obscure talk about pattens of the laides seating arrangements really doesn't help us.
The issue is we need to stay and hear this controversial debate. But they want us to leave. We need to make an argument for why we should be staying when they clearly want us gone.
I suggest the argument that we are interested in learning more about their government and culture. This is true, we do want to know the specifics on how this works, and it has the upshot of us listening in on this debate.
Is there someone actually kicking us out, or are the just giving us dirty looks?