Bat-Mite Vs BCA Galactus

Started by TheTyrant5 pages
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Oh wow that's so impressive. And She-Hulk argues with her narrator. You're ignoring the fact that Bat-Mite stood up to a being who erased an Omniverse, that's his feat, not entering the real world (which Galactus still hasn't done).

He brought someone from the real world into a comic(TOAA mind you). How much more proof do you need?

Galactus in the BCA could have eaten the omniverse.

The UN nullifies this punk + all reality.

Originally posted by TheTyrant
He brought someone from the real world into a comic(TOAA mind you). How much more proof do you need?

Galactus in the BCA could have eaten the omniverse.

The UN nullifies this punk + all reality.


Dude that wasn't TOAA, that was just Stan Lee. I know TOAA represents Stan Lee but do you seriously believe Galactus would speak like that if he were talking to the Supreme Being of the MU? 😬

UN has got nothing on Mxy who couldn't destroy BM.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Dude that wasn't TOAA, that was just Stan Lee. I know TOAA represents Stan Lee but do you seriously believe Galactus would speak like that if he were talking to the Supreme Being of the MU? 😬

UN has got nothing on Mxy who couldn't destroy BM.

What do you mean? How did you expect Galactus to talk to a human who is virtually powerless when not sitting on his desk and drawing/erasing/editing the comics?

The UN's power is virtually limitless, and BM isn't exactly Mxy's equal ya know?

Originally posted by TheTyrant
What do you mean? How did you expect Galactus to talk to a human who is virtually powerless when not sitting on his desk and drawing/erasing/editing the comics?

The UN's power is virtually limitless, and BM isn't exactly Mxy's equal ya know?


So he didn't mouth of to TOAA, he mouthed off to a human.
Do you have any sources that prove that comic to be canon?

You don't have to be Mxy's equal to be the UN's superior, just close enough as in BM's case.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
So he didn't mouth of to TOAA, he mouthed off to a human.
Do you have any sources that prove that comic to be canon?

You don't have to be Mxy's equal to be the UN's superior, just close enough as in BM's case.

That comic was exactly like every single comic in which Mxy has had appeared in(canon but a joke).

Now here are the BCA feats taken directly from big G's respect thread..

"If Galactus isn't stopped now, the ENTIRE UNIVERSE will PERISH"

"the Fantastic Four are trying to stop Galactus from DESTROYING the UNIVERSE"

The Dreaming or (Black Celestial) was using GALACTUS to DESTROY ALL of Reality, to then CREATE a NEW ONE.

His (Galactus) appetite increased Geometrically, he would consume not only Planets, but the ENTIRE UNIVERSE"

Galactus's Power can obliterate the ENTIRE race of Celestials, DESTROY the UNIVERSE and CREATE a NEW one.

"and with the UNIVERSE DESTROYED, not even the Celestials will survive, the Black Celestial will become the NUCLEUS and FOUNDER of a NEW UNIVERSE"

"He will be a GOD"

"Galactus Himself is the WEAPON"

"The time will come soon when ALL the ENERGY in the UNIVERSE through out it's HISTORY will NOT be SUFFICIENT to feed him"

"Galactus who's busy wolfin' (eating) down ALL of TIME and SPACE"

"Still the Giant doth continue to GROW"

"Eventually, Thor, He would SPAN the ENTIRE UNIVERSE"

So not only will he absorb the Universe but he will become as big as one.

Finally,

in order to stop himself from absorbing the UNIVERSE and EVERYTHING BEYOND

Galactus ERASES that UNIVERSE from existence

"And without a sound, the UNIVERSE behind them softly and suddenly VANISHES AWAY"

Galactus eats the mite and there is nothing he can do about it.

^Wow a Universe. Huh if only BM and Mxy had destroyed one of those. Oh wait...
🙄

...
Did you even LOOK?
He was feeding on all reality. By universe they meant omniverse. Just like thanos with the heart of the universe was said to only have the power of universe.

and it would be pretty stupid to destroy the universe that he was feeding on in order to save it wouldn't ya say?

Originally posted by TheTyrant
...
Did you even LOOK?
He was feeding on all reality. By universe they meant omniverse. Just like thanos with the heart when they only said he had the power of universe.

Not this Universe=Multiverse=Omniverse bullshit again. 😘

in order to stop himself from absorbing the UNIVERSE and EVERYTHING BEYOND

Galactus ERASES that UNIVERSE from existence

"And without a sound, the UNIVERSE behind them softly and suddenly VANISHES AWAY"

why would he destroy the universe that he was feeding on in order to save it? Simple, he was eating alot more than a single universe and so he stopped himself from eating all time and space(again it was mentioned).

Originally posted by TheTyrant
in order to stop himself from absorbing the UNIVERSE and EVERYTHING BEYOND

Galactus ERASES that UNIVERSE from existence

"And without a sound, the UNIVERSE behind them softly and suddenly VANISHES AWAY"

why would he destroy the universe that he was feeding on in order to save it? Simple, he was eating alot more than a single universe and so he stopped himself from eating all time and space(again it was mentioned).


Do the words hyperbole mean nothing to you? You're trying to compare hypotheticals and semantic manipulations of words like Universe and Reality with on-panel obliteration of entire Universes.

Now it's hyperbole? You'are actually dismissing on-panel statements.

Galactus eats the BM or ultimately nullifies him. Then proceeds to kill Mxy and then goes to eat the fifth dimension. and then kills Imperiex just for the lulz.

I mean afterall the imps were scared shitless of the AM.

Some people need to work on their reading comprehension. During the entirety of the Black Celestial arc, Galactus did not so much as consume a single universe. Sure there was some talk pertaining to what he might be able to eventually do -- but said speechification never came into fruition, I'm afraid. What we know for sure is that Galactus was destroyed when he used UN to erase the single universe he resided in.

We also know that Bat-Mite is capable of easily destroying universes (and apparently Spectre as well):
http://img62.imageshack.us/i/bm1r.jpg/

Furthermore, Bat-Mite was literally unscathed by Mxy's final onslaught which, for all intents and purposes, nullified the entirety of DC:
http://img692.imageshack.us/i/bm2j.jpg/
http://img11.imageshack.us/i/bm3cz.jpg/
http://img690.imageshack.us/i/bm4.jpg/

So even if BCA Galactus were to use the UN in this battle, he would only be killing himself.

Bat-Mite ftw.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Galactus wasn't destroyed in the BCA arc by taking out one universe,
that suggestion is laughable.

Galactus was killed by the UN, which in turn erased the reality he was created in,
in order to nullify the existence of that Galactus from ever being,
who duh, was born in said reality.

The UN rubbed out "What If" Korvac, who was absorbing Multiversal powers like candy,
yet only "What If" Korvac's Reality was annihilated.
This is to again, nullify the existence of that Korvac from ever being,
who again, duh, was born in said Reality. 🙂

Love when you use someone else's post as your response. 👆

Anyhow, I'm sure you have on panel proof to support the notion that BCA Galactus was capable of tanking 'standard' universe-destroying attacks, eh?

Originally posted by Galan007
Some people need to work on their reading comprehension. During the entirety of the Black Celestial arc, Galactus did not so much as consume a single universe. Sure there was some talk pertaining to what he might be able to eventually do -- but said speechification never came into fruition, I'm afraid. What we know for sure is that Galactus was destroyed when he used UN to erase the single universe he resided in.

So even if BCA Galactus were to use the UN in this battle, he would only be killing himself.

Uh oh, Galan. Now you have earned the wrath of Mr.Master 😉

Galactus gets stomped I guess.

Originally posted by galactusischere
Uh oh, Galan. Now you have earned the wrath of Mr.Master 😉
Not a single word of my post was opinion-based, or incorrect. So I'm not sure what would upset him..? mmm

Originally posted by Galan007
Not a single word of my post was opinion-based, or incorrect. So I'm not sure what would upset him..? mmm
you questioned another poster's tact in quoting him. 😐

Originally posted by Galan007
Not a single word of my post was opinion-based, or incorrect.
Irrelevant.

Originally posted by Starscream M
you questioned another poster's tact in quoting him. 😐
I never said anything about the post itself -- just commented on him (The Tyrant) having used someone else's statement to dodge any point(s) being made.

Originally posted by Galan007
I never said anything about the post itself -- just commented on him (The Tyrant) having used someone else's statement to dodge any point(s) being made.
you implied Mr. Master's posts should not be relied on. otherwise, there's nothing wrong with quoting someone else.