Link, Dark Link, Midna, Zelda and Ganondorf Vs Sargeras

Started by Cyner4 pages

affect*

Originally posted by Cyner
affect*

Lol, you're a douche, Cyner.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Wearing fire retardant clothing is a bit different from being so allergic to peanuts that they don't effect you. 😛

You can be allergic to dogs and still own some and cuddle with them.

Originally posted by Cyner
affect*

Effect wasn't wrong, but quite the admirable effort of you.

Originally posted by Q'Anilia
You can be allergic to dogs and still own some and cuddle with them.

Effect wasn't wrong, but quite the admirable effort of you.

lol, you're a douche Q'Anilia

Originally posted by Q'Anilia
Link, Dark Link and Ganondorf has all three been persistently debated against powerful foes, so I put the three together and against Sargeras. True, this could be viewed as spite, but for the reason that there are those that would agree, I don't see it as such. I think Sargeras would win, but that's just my opinion.
Sargeras is large enough to plant his sword in the side of a planet, as you saw.

So, other than 5L, whom absolutely no one, not even the lollovelink club, takes seriously, who is going to debate this?

Actually, I think Cyner was correct in correcting ScreamPaste.

If Scream had said "It would have no effect" he would have been correct.

Even 5L conceded, Neme.

EXACTLY. 131

Would Pyron vs Sargeras be a good battle?

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Actually, I think Cyner was correct in correcting ScreamPaste.

If Scream had said "It would have no effect" he would have been correct.

True as that is, his usage of "effect" is not incorrect even though there is a more accurate phrasing.

Originally posted by Phanteros
Would Pyron vs Sargeras be a good battle?

Not really. Too little is known about Sargeras to pit him against someone like Pyron.

Originally posted by Q'Anilia
True as that is, his usage of "effect" is not incorrect even though there is a more accurate phrasing.

I'm not perfect with the language, but don't we treat effect as a noun and affect as a verb?

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
I'm not perfect with the language, but don't we treat effect as a noun and affect as a verb?

Effect is both a noun and a verb.

Saying "thunderbolt having a super effect" is using effect as a noun, with super being the adjective describing how effective it is.

Effect as a verb is often used to say to bring into existence, as in to effect a change for example.

Affect is the more typically used, but effect was not really wrong.

I'm thinking Sarg could literally squash all of them.

Originally posted by Q'Anilia
You can be allergic to dogs and still own some and cuddle with them.

IMO this does not work. As if you can cuddle a dog without your allergies acting up you arn't badly allergic to the dog. However, Sargeras is literally pure evil and thus he should in the the metaphor be deathly allergic to dogs. Of course the MS would be little more than a hair.

You can be deathly allergic to dogs, and not die when you touch a dog hair.

There I think that one works.

Originally posted by NemeBro
So, other than 5L, whom absolutely no one, not even the lollovelink club, takes seriously, who is going to debate this?

So much attention for little ol' me? I'm flattered.