Originally posted by Starscream MYes, Thor wasn't even punching the ground and causing that collateral damage to the landscape. Now you're getting it. Or not.
none of them shows thor smashing the ground with his fist and creating an earthquake...but they're all fairly impressive, except the second one.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
facepalmI find it utterly insane that this thread, and some posters, suggest that without Mjolnir or his other powers, Thor would lose to Wolverine in combat.
Stripped of his powers and left just with his superhuman attributes, we are looking at some one pretty much the exact mirror image on Hercules or Namor, both of which Wolverine's has beaten. You might not like it sure, but Wolverine has been shown to have an edge in combat speed against all three of them, the ability to injure them and the ability to take their best blows and keep fighting.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
It think you guys aren't focusing on whats important here.http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Stats/ThorStrength41476.jpg
Look at that drawing of Thor. lmao
Happy now! 🙁
Originally posted by srankmissingninMortal Hercules =/= Immortal Hercules. Namor (out of the water) =/= Thor.
Stripped of his powers and left just with his superhuman attributes, we are looking at some one pretty much the exact mirror image on Hercules or Namor, both of which Wolverine's has beaten. You might not like it sure, but Wolverine has been shown to have an edge in combat speed against all three of them, the ability to injure them and the ability to take their best blows and keep fighting.
Also... /endthread
Originally posted by Starscream M😂
go back to opining on DC cosmic threads...this thread is out of your area of expertise and jurisdiction! 😠
Originally posted by Starscream M"Expertise" is right...
thing lost to wolverine. and a mjolnirless powerless thor isn't much better than thing, if at all, other than some strength advantage.
