Originally posted by Omega Vision
My biggest problem making my strategy is that I know absolutely nothing about Charcoal beyond his wiki page. πThanks. π
Have replaced the mixed scans...BTW, that's in line with "general knowledge" rule- luckily Canary's familiar with both Terrific and Deathstroke, and as for Cage...well, his wiki page says exactly who he isπ
Originally posted by Starscream M
ok, and just how did you get from that that I was a smurph fanboy?
It was with a stupid smilie after it, so I assumed OV's comment was a joke. That's usually forum code for sarcasm to avoid misinterpretations like yours. Probably not something that needs to be made into something.
srug
Originally posted by Digihe didn't have a smilie following the comment I quoted.
It was with a stupid smilie after it, so I assumed OV's comment was a joke. That's usually forum code for sarcasm to avoid misinterpretations like yours. Probably not something that needs to be made into something.srug
Originally posted by Digisorry if I was making it a controversy...not my intent.
Well his original quote about the subject involved the smilie, you did quote it, and it was obviously a joke. He also said he was sorry. I'm still failing to see the controversy.
I think people misconstrued my predictions...I wasn't basing it on the debator, but the team.
I think it was ridiculous that you guys allowed someone to draft wolverine and cyclops in a lowmeta tourney. I don't quite understand how creed was banned but an arguably more powerful logan was allowed.
Originally posted by Starscream M
how am I bi1ching? I'm just explaining my rationale.
Just out of curiosity, what do you think is more "uncalled for:"
1. You telling OV that you "vehemently disagree" with the idea that he did a much better job of debating in this tourney than in the last (which is pretty much an indisputable fact).
or
2. OV jokingly calling you a Smurph fanboy?
To top it all off, you throw a fit over OV's joke like a woman on her period. Hence me telling you to "quit your bitching."