Marvel vs Capcom 3

Started by NemeBro101 pages

They could have put in Wolverine twice and given the Wolverines entirely different playstyles each.

Playstyle is not why I think X-23 is a character that does not need to be in this game, same with She-Hulk. Want MOAR UNIQUE characters, not extensions of pre-existing ones. No matter how you slice it, She-Hulk and X-23 are extensions of Hulk and Wolverine, fandom be damned.

Yeah, problem with that is, the long time fans of the series want functional uniqness, not aesthetic uniqness. People who are really going to play the hell outta this game care more about how the character plays, not really who they are. Hand you a NEW lookin' character and give'im Ryu's moves and all is good. That's what it sounds like. Why would Capcom listen to people who are gonna buy the game and trade it back a week later?

If you go to SRK or Ehubs now, you'll see cats have jumped on the X-23 band wagon cuz she doesn't function like Wolvy, after all and she's phuckin' good.

Originally posted by No End N Site
Yeah, problem with that is, the long time fans of the series want functional uniqness, not aesthetic uniqness. People who are really going to play the hell outta this game care more about how the character play, not really who they are. Hand you a NEW lookin' character and give'im Ryu's moves and all is good. That's what it sounds like.

If you go to SRK or Ehubs now, you'll see cats have jumped on the X-23 band wagon cuz she doesn't function like Wolvy, after all and she's phuckin' good.

You can put in Aunt May and make her play well. Of course functional uniqueness is important, but the characters themselves or, when you already have Wolverine, why put in X-23 when you could have put in Doctor Strange?

Originally posted by NemeBro
You can put in Aunt May and make her play well. Of course functional uniqueness is important, but the characters themselves or, when you already have Wolverine, why put in X-23 when you could have put in Doctor Strange?

I don't know why they would choose X-23 over Doctor Strange when Wolvy is there, but I'm damn sure that question aint gonna matter when the game is out cuz no matter how garbage she is in the comics, she's a phuckin' beast in the game. Torneys are gonna have teams built around her and when people are kickin' ass with her, they wont have any regrets.

When the character is good and has a fun playstyle, doesn't really matter who it is anymore.

Games don't thrive off of their hardcore fans, though.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Games don't thrive off of their hardcore fans, though.

Not really talkin' about the "harcore", tho. SFIV sold 3.? (something) mill and most of it's online consisted of Ryu and Ken. No one give a phuck about characters after a while. If the game is fun, it's fun. No matter who the hell is in it.

True that

Originally posted by No End N Site
I don't know why they would choose X-23 over Doctor Strange when Wolvy is there, but I'm damn sure that question aint gonna matter when the game is out cuz no matter how garbage she is in the comics, she's a phuckin' beast in the game. Torneys are gonna have teams built around her and when people are kickin' ass with her, they wont have any regrets.

When the character is good and has a fun playstyle, doesn't really matter who it is anymore.

They could make Uncle Ben's corpse a beast in the games.

It was a bad decision, period, despite your claims to the contrary, characters DO matter, is it enough to make me shun the game? No, but it is a flaw.

Originally posted by NemeBro
They could make Uncle Ben's corpse a beast in the games.

It was a bad decision, period, despite your claims to the contrary, characters DO matter, is it enough to make me shun the game? No, but it is a flaw.

You wanna know what's a real damn flaw, the pushback pushes back too damn far, Dr.Doom has 0 recovery frames after a midair Photon Toss and Felica's Please Help does shitty damege for a level 3.

I honestly don't care about who the phuck X-23 is, the chick looks like fun. But to each his own, everyone's lookin for somethin' different nowadays.

Originally posted by KCJ506

Ryu and Ken however share more than one.

Anyone else smell the bullshit? You think Ryu is better than Ken. Fine. But DO NOT say they play alike. In SSFIV, you CAN NOT play these two the same way. Hell, Akuma has exactly the same moveset, plus some extras. Don't lie and say you use THOSE two the same way. Also, you're forgetting something crucial--Their ultras/specials. For as long as I've known Ken and Ryu, Ken has had the shoryu ultra and Ryu, a Hadoken. That's not a BIG difference? Bollocks. And before you rush to defend yourself, ask yourself this: In a cooky world, where instead of Ryu they put Ken as the Capcom poster boy. Would you, or would you not be bitching about also including Ryu?

FYI- Ken has been in SF as long as Ryu, and deserves the same amount of respect. The guy's name means FIST for crying out loud

Originally posted by Th3birdman
Anyone else smell the bullshit? You think Ryu is better than Ken. Fine. But DO NOT say they play alike. In SSFIV, you CAN NOT play these two the same way. Hell, Akuma has exactly the same moveset, plus some extras. Don't lie and say you use THOSE two the same way. Also, you're forgetting something crucial--Their ultras/specials. For as long as I've known Ken and Ryu, Ken has had the shoryu ultra and Ryu, a Hadoken. That's not a BIG difference? Bollocks. And before you rush to defend yourself, ask yourself this: In a cooky world, where instead of Ryu they put Ken as the Capcom poster boy. Would you, or would you not be bitching about also including Ryu?

FYI- Ken has been in SF as long as Ryu, and deserves the same amount of respect. The guy's name means FIST for crying out loud

I never said Ryu is better than Ken. Please don't put words in my mouth.

And again I know they're not 100% the same, but they're that much different and Ken's not different enough to warrant a spot. Especially since the roster is limited. Akuma can do some things Ryu can't, but that doesn't make him completely different.

If the roster had more characters then I wouldn't mind Ken. Since it's limited I want as many unique characters as possible.

And I guess you forgot that Nitsuma was anti-clone. If Punisher isn't getting because they think he'd be too similar to Chris, no way are they putting in Ken or any other shotos.

And why are you acting like this would be the first time Ken has been left out of a Capcom vs game? He's wasn't in MVC1, CFE, or TVC. His exclusion here would be nothing new.

Why couldn't they just put cammy in x-23 place? But mark my words, dorreen green will be a female spiderman and be the fastest female in the game.

Originally posted by killermover
Why couldn't they just put cammy in x-23 place? But mark my words, dorreen green will be a female spiderman and be the fastest female in the game.

If X-23 wasn't in Cammy wouldn't have her spot. It would just be another Marvel character.

Originally posted by KCJ506
I never said Ryu is better than Ken. Please don't put words in my mouth.

And again I know they're not 100% the same, but they're that much different and Ken's not different enough to warrant a spot. Especially since the roster is limited. Akuma can do some things Ryu can't, but that doesn't make him completely different.

If the roster had more characters then I wouldn't mind Ken. Since it's limited I want as many unique characters as possible.

And I guess you forgot that Nitsuma was anti-clone. If Punisher isn't getting because they think he'd be too similar to Chris, no way are they putting in Ken or any other shotos.

And why are you acting like this would be the first time Ken has been left out of a Capcom vs game? He's wasn't in MVC1, CFE, or TVC. His exclusion here would be nothing new.

Didn't mean you really thought he was better, stop being a baby. Answer the question-- if Ken had been in MvC3, would you not be bitching about Ryu not being in the game? And just because they're KIND OF similar, doesn't mean people will use them the same way. SSFIV- case in point. I asked to to consider what I said before you rush to defend yourself. You did not do this......

Originally posted by Th3birdman
Didn't mean you really thought he was better, stop being a baby. Answer the question-- if Ken had been in MvC3, would you not be bitching about Ryu not being in the game? And just because they're KIND OF similar, doesn't mean people will use them the same way. SSFIV- case in point. I asked to to consider what I said before you rush to defend yourself. You did not do this......

Yes indeed I would. My reasons for not wanting both of them in this game are in my previous post.

Now you answer the question I asked before.

And why are you acting like this would be the first time Ken has been left out of a Capcom vs game? He's wasn't in MVC1, CFE, or TVC. His exclusion here would be nothing new.

Originally posted by KCJ506
Yes indeed I would. My reasons for not wanting both of them in this game are in my previous post.

Now you answer the question I asked before.

You're an idiot hypocrite, whose argument has just failed. You just admitted you would bitc* if Ryu wasn't included too, whilst at the same time making a case against the inclusion of Ken. I don't get you. If they're that similar, why wouldn't you be satisfied with just Ken? BECAUSE YOU THINK RYU IS BETTER. Oh but

Originally posted by KCJ506
I never said Ryu is better than Ken. Please don't put words in my mouth.

Can it.

Originally posted by Th3birdman
You're an idiot hypocrite, whose argument has just failed. You just admitted you would bitc* if Ryu wasn't included too, whilst at the same time making a case against the inclusion of Ken. I don't get you. If they're that similar, why wouldn't you be satisfied with just Ken? BECAUSE YOU THINK RYU IS BETTER. Oh but

Can it.

You can loose the pointless jackass attitude. I misread your question. I thought you were asking if Ken was in if I would be against Ryu making the cut. I meant if Ken was in instead of Ryu then I wouldn't want Ryu.

And once again you choose to ignore the question I asked you.

Originally posted by KCJ506
You can lay off the jackass attitude. I misread your question. I meant if Ken was in instead of Ryu then I wouldn't want Ryu.

And once again you choose to ignore the question I asked you.

It's not something I can turn off 😄

I honestly am a huge critic of Capcom's moves. I didn't complain about Ken's non-inclusion in MvC because I was stoked at the time that Marvel got to whip Capcom's characters. I was young, and didn't give an ass rat's who was on the roster, as long as I had my mate Spidey. TvC imo was flawed because it only came out on IMO a rubbish system. But No Ken and a MODOK on MvC3-- unacceptable.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Gay.

Yes, I would go gay for her. Thank you.

I also wish Ken was in this game