Whould you kill someone for a Billion dollar?

Originally posted by kgkg
Would you kill someone for a Billion dollar?

The catch is that no one will find out what you did meaning there won't be any consequences.

Also amuse that killing is rather easy.

So would you

1.Random evil person.
2.Random person
3.Random good person

1. I'll do it for free.
2. Depends...
3. Only if it is Assisted suicide.

Now, give my Billions; otherwise you will be the 4th person.

i would kill you all for free. you slugs

You don't have enough salt.

Besides. Salt wont work on lizardsheepslugs....

Originally posted by kgkg
Would you kill someone for a Billion dollar?

The catch is that no one will find out what you did meaning there won't be any consequences.

Also amuse that killing is rather easy.

So would you

1.Random evil person.
2.Random person
3.Random good person

yes to all three, the key is to not leave any dna and make sure no one is around, then you can get away with it

always have an alibi just in case but me i am lazy i was at home playing video games or watching a show then i go on line and watch it or devo it...

also pick up your shell casings and wear gloves when loading the rounds. also make sure it is a random mark not connected to you.. easy breesy and yes no witnesses..

i personally would use a silencer whether home made, improve or custom.

No.

No.

No.

Originally posted by kgkg
Would you kill someone for a Billion dollar?

The catch is that no one will find out what you did meaning there won't be any consequences.

Also amuse that killing is rather easy.

So would you

1.Random evil person.
2.Random person
3.Random good person

If no one will find out what I did and there are no consequences, then

1.Yes
2.Yes
3.Yes

Assuming the "evil" and "good" adjectives are congruent with my own notion of each concept, my answers are as follows:

1. Yes, I'd kill this person.
2. If I get to decide after the random person is revealed to me, my answer isn't definite until that point. In all other scenarios, I would not kill this person.
3. I would not kill this person.

Yes to all, I have no problem with morals.

No, not unless they were a threat to me or my family. In that case, I'd do it for free.

I hope half the people in this thread are just joking about killing random people for money or this world is even more ****ed up than I thought

I'd be concerned about the money. One billion in cash is probably very difficult to move/store safely. The money could be wired, but a billion dollar transaction is going to catch someone's attention. If you spend it like you are a billionaire, you are going to have the tax man calling. If not, wishing to maintain such a lifestyle would undoubtedly require more murder for more billions.

So, in the end, I'm stuck with huge amounts of money I can't spend that is a constant threat to my personal and legal security, all for the 'privilage' of killing someone? even if they are evil?

While access to that kind of money might do a lot to reduce my moral concerns, it really does just pose an additional problem.

Originally posted by inimalist
I'd be concerned about the money. One billion in cash is probably very difficult to move/store safely. The money could be wired, but a billion dollar transaction is going to catch someone's attention. If you spend it like you are a billionaire, you are going to have the tax man calling. If not, wishing to maintain such a lifestyle would undoubtedly require more murder for more billions.

So, in the end, I'm stuck with huge amounts of money I can't spend that is a constant threat to my personal and legal security, all for the 'privilage' of killing someone? even if they are evil?

While access to that kind of money might do a lot to reduce my moral concerns, it really does just pose an additional problem.

You get in through a series of shell companies in the form of nonsequential, unmarked bearer bonds that are e-mailed to your off-shore Swiss bank account.

Originally posted by Spartan005
I hope half the people in this thread are just joking about killing random people for money or this world is even more ****ed up than I thought

Too much of a conscious 🙄

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
You get in through a series of shell companies in the form of nonsequential, unmarked bearer bonds that are e-mailed to your off-shore Swiss bank account.

even then, in the case of an audit, I need to account for any material possessions I have, so I can't go buy things even if swiss banks aren't co-operating with the gvt

however, international finance is something the Bush administration actually did attack with the PATRIOT act, and according to Misha Glenny, an expert on international crime, has been very successful at combating the type of money transfers you are talking about

id kill inimalist for a billion dollars.

😄

i'd hope so

dont worry. you'd get half

What a pointless question.

Originally posted by Spartan005
I hope half the people in this thread are just joking about killing random people for money or this world is even more ****ed up than I thought

Originally posted by inimalist
I'd be concerned about the money. One billion in cash is probably very difficult to move/store safely. The money could be wired, but a billion dollar transaction is going to catch someone's attention. If you spend it like you are a billionaire, you are going to have the tax man calling. If not, wishing to maintain such a lifestyle would undoubtedly require more murder for more billions.

So, in the end, I'm stuck with huge amounts of money I can't spend that is a constant threat to my personal and legal security, all for the 'privilage' of killing someone? even if they are evil?

While access to that kind of money might do a lot to reduce my moral concerns, it really does just pose an additional problem.

Originally posted by BackFire
What a pointless question.