I hope half the people in this thread are just joking about killing random people for money or this world is even more ****ed up than I thought
I don't know about everyone else, but I'd fully intend to do good acts with my billion, like Autokrat suggested. I only need a few mills for myself anyway. That money could do alot more good than 1 measly person, especially an evil person, or a normal person given that most people are selfish arseholes who rarely help their fellow man. The good guy would give me pause though.
Originally posted by inimalist
then it is a fantasy world anyways and everyone should say yesbesides, there have to be consequences, such as: [b]moral consequences
[/B]
To be fair, I included moral consequences in my "barring conviction related issues" thingy.
Originally posted by Nephthys
I don't know about everyone else, but I'd fully intend to do good acts with my billion, like Autokrat suggested. I only need a few mills for myself anyway. That money could do alot more good than 1 measly person, especially an evil person, or a normal person given that most people are selfish arseholes who rarely help their fellow man. The good guy would give me pause though.
I'm not accusing you of anything. Your post just inspires this question within me.
Originally posted by inimalist
hold on, just let me cut through this thick irony with a knife here...
Originally posted by StyleTime
To each scenario?
if there are no negative consequences, then yes, it would be foolish to give up that money for such a small price
Originally posted by StyleTime
To be fair, I included moral consequences in my "barring conviction related issues" thingy.
wouldn't conviction been like legal reprimand?
1. Yes. A bad person with money to spare is hardly ever good for anyone else.
2. Most likely not unless I become more dark in the future or am really desperate.
3. Nah, whatever this person does with the money is better then what I would.
Honestly dont think that id get much moral issues with 1. Besides, if I did theres always the option of hiring the best Psychiatrist to help that out.
Originally posted by Spartan005
I hope half the people in this thread are just joking about killing random people for money or this world is even more ****ed up than I thought
Originally posted by inimalistLol, 1's a fatty, 2's 12, 3 is the only one who looks like he may have hit puberty, not been hit by puberty, and 4 is 8 years old.
hold on, just let me cut through this thick irony with a knife here...
I'm not saying I'm the toughest guy in history, just saying I could probably take all the prepubescents and victims of puberty (such as 4-eyed fatty, and would probably be equally matched vs 3.)
Originally posted by One Free Man
Lol, 1's a fatty, 2's 12, 3 is the only one who looks like he may have hit puberty, not been hit by puberty, and 4 is 8 years old.I'm not saying I'm the toughest guy in history, just saying I could probably take all the prepubescents and victims of puberty (such as 4-eyed fatty, and would probably be equally matched vs 3.)
you do see how it is a little ironic though, you criticizing the people in this thread for being internet-tough-guys then naming who and why you could beat up...
Originally posted by inimalist
if there are no negative consequences, then yes, it would be foolish to give up that money for such a small pricewouldn't conviction been like legal reprimand?
It can refer to that, yes. It can also refer to strongly held beliefs which is more what I was playing at.
This is an interesting thread to me(kudos kgkg), and I'm actually surprised at some of the responses(provided they be sincere). As conceited as it may sound, I expected more answers to resemble my own.
Originally posted by Mindset
I would kill anyone, anytime, for any reason.