Call of Duty: Black Ops

Started by Nemesis X9 pages

Apparentley this game still needs more patching. In the killcam, I spot bullets that didn't hit this guy and yet they still killed him anyways. That is ridiculous.

Meh, I don't find that annoying. Everybody has the same game to play with so there isn't an advantage and also, what online shooter does not have killbox issues?

Originally posted by Nemesis X
Apparentley this game still needs more patching. In the killcam, I spot bullets that didn't hit this guy and yet they still killed him anyways. That is ridiculous.

I noticed that with even World At War you shoot at someone and then the othe guy kills you and then you see the Kill Cam and according to it you did'nt fire any bullets 😬

That's how games always are. Patching it won't do anything because of the "PING" XD lol

Not necessarily.

If the kill boxes are ****ed up, doesn't matter what the latency is.

For example, for years in TF2, a spy could backstab somebody in the face and get an instakill. The community called it facestabbing because if you attack somebody in the front, it's not an instakill. The kill box was screwed up. The hit was registered as a backstab because the knife went through the head and hit the back of the body kill box.

Originally posted by Smasandian
what online shooter does not have killbox issues?

The Halo games.

http://halowiki.net/images/0/0f/Sniper_Rifle_Inch_Miss.jpg

I betcha that people have issues with killboxes in Halo games.

Nothing like CoD's issues. Its more connection issues than hitbox issues.

Originally posted by Smasandian
I betcha that people have issues with killboxes in Halo games.

I'm guessing that you did not click the link. In Halo, you can miss even by an inch while in CoD, you can get a headshot just by shooting your target between the shouler and the head. "People have issues with killboxes in Halo games" my @$$.

I have played this game twice. I really liked the storyline of this game and graphics, sound, gaming controls were awesome. I have played all the games in the Call of Duty series and without any doubts can say that this is the best game I've ever played. I like first person shooter, third person shooter, racing games.

First DLC "First Strike"

five fresh maps, four of which are for multiplayer and one of which fleshes out the game's popular zombie mode.

http://www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-7319-Call-of-Duty--Black-Ops--First-Strike--DLC-Revealed-in-New-Trailer.html

Call of Duty Black Ops is terrible in general. Graphics are terrible. The game play is ridiculously slow. All the weapons are basically the same(sound/strength/style). Did I mention the broken kill streaks? The only thing this game has is customization and zombies. Otherwise, it's a rent only game. I played it twice. Haven't picked it up since.

But it has Elena Siegman

That alone is enough to make this a Game of the Year.

Originally posted by The Red
Call of Duty Black Ops is terrible in general. Graphics are terrible. The game play is ridiculously slow. All the weapons are basically the same(sound/strength/style). Did I mention the broken kill streaks? The only thing this game has is customization and zombies. Otherwise, it's a rent only game. I played it twice. Haven't picked it up since.

Imo this is one of the better multiplayer games ever created.

You say that it is slo, compared to what?

You say the graphics are terrible? again compared to what? it might not have the highest pxels count, or the biggest map , but graphics go beyond that and I think it holds up very well, it suits the style very good. Hell that new Kirby game is regognized as having very good graphics even tho its 2d, but it suits the style, same with this.

The weapons are the same now? ok, how is the shotgun the same as the ak47? or how is the M60 alike the Stoner63?

Or even how is the crossbow anything alike the tomahawk?...

Killstreaks are broken now? How so? atleast its not like in MW2 where as the killstreaks acturlly add up to your current kill count, which was bad game design or atleast too rewarding for the better players, making the game a misrable hell for noobs.

It is slow compared to the Modern Warfare games. Because every map has horrible line of sight (something they did to make it harder for snipers), 99% of the matches consist of surprise attacks and camping.

The graphics are Modern Warfare 1 level graphics, if that. They look like shit, compared even to MW2, and the textures are horrible. Halo Reach also blows them out of the water.

The weapons are the same in the sense that an M60 is virtually no different from any of the other LMG's. The AK is virtually no different from any of the other assault rifles, etc. If you're going to argue that an AK is different from an M16 because the M16 has burst fire, than you're missing the point.

Also, sniper rifles are virtually useless now, sans the second to last one, and that is something that nearly the entire community has argued about. The knife is also broken.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
It is slow compared to the Modern Warfare games. Because every map has horrible line of sight (something they did to make it harder for snipers), 99% of the matches consist of surprise attacks and camping.

The graphics are Modern Warfare 1 level graphics, if that. They look like shit, compared even to MW2, and the textures are horrible. Halo Reach also blows them out of the water.

The weapons are the same in the sense that an M60 is virtually no different from any of the other LMG's. The AK is virtually no different from any of the other assault rifles, etc. If you're going to argue that an AK is different from an M16 because the M16 has burst fire, than you're missing the point.

Also, sniper rifles are virtually useless now, sans the second to last one, and that is something that nearly the entire community has argued about. The knife is also broken.


AK is incredibly different from the other assault rifles, they've acknowledged that sniper rifles are crap and are tweaking them, and are you seriously complaining about MW graphics? Aren't you a picky little one.

Originally posted by General_Iroh
AK is incredibly different from the other assault rifles, they've acknowledged that sniper rifles are crap and are tweaking them, and are you seriously complaining about MW graphics? Aren't you a picky little one.
Picky? What is wrong with you? Hammerhans specifically asked what was wrong with the graphics.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Picky? What is wrong with you? Hammerhans specifically asked what was wrong with the graphics.

And you said they look like shit, as if MW had horrid graphics 😬

MW1 has horrid graphics compared to now, yeah.

Just like, Final Fantasy 7's graphics were the bomb ten years ago, they're shit now.

MW, MW2, Call of Duty World at War, and Black Ops basically look the same, its like comparing Doom to Doom 2, or Doom 3 to Quake 4, or Mortal Kombat 2 to Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3, its the same just with different settings and style.

Now lets be honest here, Black Ops has more closed quarters fighting than MW2, hence why the snipers are so redundant now.

Close quarters as far as I can tell equals more intense fighting which equals a faster gameplay, there is always action in black ops, non stop almost, you hardly need to look for more than 10 secs to find people. Thats my take on it.

And lets talk about the sound, I use surround sound on my system and I find it MUCH more accurate than in MW 2, I have been banned on 7 servers, called a cheater in countless others simply cause of the superb sound that this game has, so many times I have heard someone coming up from behind closer... closer... and BAM I do a 180 degree turn and knife the sucka, now thats fun. also around corners and such, I hear them and start shooting just as they come around or sometimes even before, I just love that, it gives me the edge so many times.

But lets talk about the line of sight, what I like about that is the fact that it gives you options. In MW 2 you not only had more open maps but you also had STOPPING POWER (bullets do MUCH more damage), what that dose is that the guy that spots his opponent first will get a kill as long as he can aim (and the rifles in MW2 have less recoil making shooing even easier) so its MUCH easier to get kills.

And this is what the noobs are complaining about, they used to be able to kill as soon as theyd spot someone, and the campers man they loved this aswell.

Now in my opinion its more skill based, you can get shot at and survive to a greater extent, and if you do your now also able to counter the attacks, I rarely had 180 degree turns and headshots in MW2, now it happens everyday I play, several times p.session aswell. I now also get to fool enemies because of the line of sight, I can attack from other locations than the last time they saw me run around a corner or whatever.

I know what you mean Blax, but I completely disagree with your points.