For all we know blood and metal bending have been discovered by some avatars centuries ago but were forgotten and not used ever since and Hama and Toph simply rediscovered it, it doesnt mean they're the only ones who knew how to do it. Are you guys saying that in full moon Katara can beat the crap outta bloodlusted Aang in avatar state using bloodbending? I doubt it.
Originally posted by NephthysI cant think of anythink tbh. That's the reason I asked that question about bloodbending. I think that in avatar state Aang should be able to bloodbend as well, because its unlikely that hundreds of generations of avatars never discovered that ability. But im not gonna insist since there's no proof of that. Its just I have a hard time believing that Katara is THE MOST powerful being in avatar universe.😬 If that was the case Hama would've murdered Ozai years ago. Who needs that stupid avatar to keep world at peace.😛
If you can think of a way he can get around bloodbending, I'm all ears.
katara was able to stop hama from controlling her body, so the avatar state should be able to do that easily. anyone else besides waterbenders would be complete pawns in her hands tho
hamas an old woman and she cant bloodbend all of ozais guards at once.
bloodbending can be countered by a waterbender as katara did vs hama before she learned how to use it.
Originally posted by KingD19
The only way I see an Azula/Katara fight ending is in a passionate, tangle of sweaty body parts after a let's make love, not war session. Aang of course is over in the corner with his mouth stuck on the floor from the awesomeness of the Avatar's luck.
hmm
I think you won the threadz.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Its not pedo if they're just cartoons. smurph
In Australia, cartoon child porn = child porn ha-son
Originally posted by dadudemon
They'd be closer to 18, now.+
That really has no weight, since we only see them when they are 14 & 15.
Also, the entire series was aired for a period of over 3 years, and yet the events in the series only take place over a period of one year (i.e. from Aang's awakening to the defeat of Ozai, there's only an ~1 year gap).
Conclusion: Time passes differently in the Avatar-verse. There's no way they'd be anywhere near 18 now 313
Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
In Australia, cartoon child porn = child porn ha-sonThat really has no weight, since we only see them when they are 14 & 15.
Also, the entire series was aired for a period of over 3 years, and yet the events in the series only take place over a period of one year (i.e. from Aang's awakening to the defeat of Ozai, there's only an ~1 year gap).
Conclusion: Time passes differently in the Avatar-verse. There's no way they'd be anywhere near 18 now 313
Originally posted by SamZEDNo!
So if I think that this pic is kinda hot im a pedo?😬
that doesn't really qualify with what is being discussed... still dont know why it's being discussed though. That picture isn't canon to the series, it's a fan drawing of what she'd look like as an adult, not what she actually looks like... completely different.
It would make you a pedo, or at least someone with pedophilic tendencies, if you were to think Pan, from DBGT was hot.... but not if you imagine her as an adult.
Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
In Australia, cartoon child porn = child porn ha-sonThat really has no weight, since we only see them when they are 14 & 15.
Also, the entire series was aired for a period of over 3 years, and yet the events in the series only take place over a period of one year (i.e. from Aang's awakening to the defeat of Ozai, there's only an ~1 year gap).
Conclusion: Time passes differently in the Avatar-verse. There's no way they'd be anywhere near 18 now 313
Could be true, but I'm not too worried about. I was just going along with the joke.
Originally posted by SamZED
Should Aang be concidered a pedo since he's a 112 year old dude who's making out with a 14 year old girl?😛
Naaaah, chronologically he's 112, but being in suspended animation stopped the aging process, he's still 12 in body, mind, spirit, etc... If anything, when Katara hits 18, she'll be a pedo because is only 16.
You guys toss around "pedophilia" on anything.
Did you guys know that a 40 year old man having sex with a 13 year old girl could NOT be pedophilia? Depends on the sexual maturity of that female.
On the same token, did you guys know that a 20 year old man having sex with a 25 year old woman could be pedophilia? Again, it's based on the sexual maturity. Pedophilia is a sexual attraction to sexually immature people. If a lady hasn't sexually matured, looks..say...10 or 11, but is over 18, a man having sex with her would still be a pedophile if he was attracted to that type of body because it's a state of mind.
On the same token, a 40 year old woman having sex with a 13 year old male, if he is fully sexually mature and looks like a man, she is NOT a pedophile. Not even close.
Again, it is the sexual attraction to perceived age, that constitutes pedophilia or not pedophilia.
Also, in Katara's case, if she is not fully sexually mature, adults being attracted to her would not be pedophilia, it would be ephebophilia or hebephilia.
/psychology lesson.
